Fri, 23 Dec 1994

Biased reports on Myanmar

Amnesty International's report on Myanmar (AFP, Bangkok, The Jakarta Post, Dec. 21, 1994) does not really merit a reply as it is based on prejudice, and is a subtle re-run of hearsay and conjecture a few years old. Its reports on nine out of 10 Asian countries are more or less in the same vein, reflecting a consistent, proselytizing style.

The recent meetings with Daw Su Kyi were quite positive. This development reflects the inherent Myanmar characteristic and the deep sense of responsibility of all Myanmar leaders, past and present. It's not in our nature to indulge in publicity stunts. Those who think or write otherwise are truly lost in the sea of ignorance. Perhaps, they may contemplate some day to share our simple life-style and culture, with good will to create tolerance and mutual understanding.

Since its independence in 1948 all Myanmar governments (including U Nu's democratic government) have had to face and counter excessive external interference; covert, overt and insidious. The lesson for Myanmar is that its strength lies only within the country. To defend national unity, solidarity and sovereignty, human rights (encompassing values that strengthen national traditions and culture) are extended to all its citizens. This enables them to live in peace and tranquility, and to freely pursue economic activities for the good of all. Concurrently, the democratic system is being built step-by-step under the rule of law and stability.

Biased reports painting a tarnished picture of Myanmar do not reflect the vibrant economy and the happy lifestyle of the vast majority of our people. All Myanmarese in responsible positions have known for the past 46 years that only justice, protection of human rights and humane policy decisions will ensure national unity and sovereignty. Current and previous leaders of our nation have brought us to where we are today. We are on the threshold of a positive and prosperous future.

External threats, pressures or criticism, will have very little impact on our internal process to establish a prosperous and democratic Myanmar. From necessity, a patriotic and united armed forces will continue to play a pivotal role in this process -- as it was compelled to do in 1945, 1949, 1958, 1962 and 1988 -- to regain our freedom and national heritage, and to defend our hard-won independence.

SOE LYNN HANN

Press Officer

Myanmar Embassy

Jakarta