Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

Art forgery, a thorn in Indonesia's cultural bleak side

| Source: JP

Art forgery, a thorn in Indonesia's cultural bleak side

By Putu Wirata

DENPASAR, Bali (JP): In the last few weeks, the Balinese art
world has been heavily shaken by a case of art forgery involving
the noted painter Nyoman Gunarsa and the art dealer Hendra
Dinata.

The dispute between Gunarsa and Hendra, owner of Sinyo Gallery
in Denpasar, began when the painter found a number of fake
paintings bearing his signature and displayed in Hendra's
gallery.

Gunarsa and his wife Indrawati accused the art dealer of
forging his art works and selling them to the public.

Both painter and gallery owner have reported the case to the
Bali Police Office but no solution has been found so far.

Art forgery has actually become common place in the island's
art world. There are hundreds of art galleries and art shops in
some of the more famous tourist destinations like Ubud in
Gianyar, Sanur and Kuta.

One can easily find counterfeit paintings "signed" by famous
painters. While other amateurs have adopted the painting styles,
colors and subject matters of the Balinese masters.

These counterfeit paintings are perfectly rendered by the
unknown artists. Anyone other than an expert would find it
difficult to distinguish the fakes from the originals.

There are a number of sketches in Gunarsa's style done by
talented junior artists. If people put Gunarsa's signatures on
those paintings, they will undoubtedly be mistaken for the
original.

Among Bali's favorite painters are Made Wianta, Kriyono,
Sumadiyasa, Srihadi and many others. It would be hard to sue the
"unknown" artists for imitating or adopting the styles and visual
techniques of these popular painters, especially in Bali where
artworks are still regarded as communal productions.

Collective art works can be seen in every art village or art
shop on the island. When we visit an art village, we can see
people contributing to the production of certain handicrafts like
wooden animal statues depicting dolphins, ducks, zebras, birds,
cats and so forth.

In addition, almost every artist in the village produces
similar kinds of work and nobody would claim the title of pioneer
or to hold property rights over the product.

In traditional fine art, creative rights are manifested in the
form of a painters' signature on the work. The tradition only
started in Bali in the l930s when German painter Walter Spies,
Dutch artist Rudolf Bonnet and Balinese art patron Tjokorda Gde
Agung Sukawati established the Pita Maha art community.

The works of the Pita Maha group were mostly uniform in terms
of theme. They usually explored aspects of Balinese mythology and
daily rural life. The works of each artist were not valued for
their technical achievement but the ability to improve the
composition and widen the thematic choices.

The late Gusti Ketut Kobot, for instance, was renowned for his
Wayang (puppet) paintings. Painter Ida Bagus Made was recognized
as a master of humorous themes in daily life, while Sobrat was
well-known for his mastery of composition and color.

Contemporary artists and graduates of art institutes have
started to leave the "culture of anonymity," but still hold on to
the concept of collective creativity in the process of their
artistic creations.

Artist Nyoman Erawan, for instance, used Balinese Hindu icons
in his expressionistic abstract paintings in the late l980s and
he is considered by some art critics as a post-traditional Avant
Garde artist.

Afterwards, a number of young painters followed Erawan's
style. For them, Erawan's creations were a part of the "creative
epigone" because Erawan and other similar artists are not the
founders of these creative arts.

"For me, it is important to have ethics in the creation of
art. I would not claim that it is my own style. If somebody else
can develop the style properly, we have to appreciate them," said
Erawan.

So far, appreciation of an art work is not only important for
art critics but also for owners of art galleries. Therefore, they
have to posses moral ethics and a cultural vision and not merely
seek profits.

If they sell fake paintings or they ask unknown artists to
conduct art forgery, they have violated these moral ethics and
conducted a serious cultural crime.

Whether we can build a perfect cultural platform in which
people have a similar vision and idealism is a big question in
the Indonesian art world.

Counterfeit paintings exploiting famous names are sold in
hundreds of galleries in Bali and other places in Indonesia. With
sophisticated techniques, skillful artists are now able to
imitate the works of famous painters, and the imitation of an art
work even without the fake signature is close enough to an art
forgery.

In the country where corruption has become culture, the
forgery of art is considered of minor importance.

The local fine art world has been contaminated by a corrupted
mentality. These capricious people are everywhere, yet we don't
know exactly who they are. They are disguised as art dealers,
painters or other people.

An owner of an art gallery in Bali said he was frequently
offered fake paintings of Affandi, Jeihan, Srihadi and even Pablo
Picasso.

"I think those paintings were counterfeit. But I would not
dare to say they were fake to those persons," said the owner who
refused to be named.

Indonesia, he said, has not yet developed a standardized
system to properly detect and deal with art counterfeiting. He
suggested the government or art institutions apply such a system
immediately in order to curb art forgery.

"Art lovers and art collectors can no longer rely on the
credibility of art critics or gallery owners in determining the
originality of an art work," he said.

View JSON | Print