Indonesian Political, Business & Finance News

Analysts warn of higher unemployment rate in 2004

| Source: JP

Analysts warn of higher unemployment rate in 2004

The Jakarta Post, Jakarta

Economists and labor analysts warned the nation of a possible
higher unemployment rate in 2004, due to the heightened security
issue and the upcoming general elections.

Former labor minister Bomer Pasaribu said the unemployment
rate would increase by 6.2 percent to 42.5 million in 2004 from
40 million early this year, which would result in serious impacts
on the unstable situation in the social, economic and political
spheres unless emergency measures were taken.

"The unemployment problem will worsen as 2.5 million new job
seekers, mostly high school and university graduates, will join
the labor force in 2004, while only a maximum 1.1 million are
expected to be absorbed in the labor market," he said yesterday.

Workers categorized as "unemployed" are those who work less
than 40 hours per week, while "open unemployment" indicates those
without jobs.

Bomer said the number of jobless under the open unemployment
category would reach more than 15 million nationwide.

He warned that the issue was a time bomb that could explode
some time soon if no progress is achieved in improving the
economic, political and security situations.

Bomer, chairman of the Center for Labor and Development
Studies (CLDS) and labor economy lecturer at the Bogor Institute
of Agriculture (IPB), said he was pessimistic that Indonesia's
economic growth would reach five percent in the 2004 fiscal year,
since the government did not seem serious in handling security
issues, including terrorist attacks and separatism, to create an
environment conducive to investment.

Coordinating Minister for the Economy Dorodjatun Kuntjoro-
Jakti said the President was scheduled to present the draft 2004
budget to the House of Representatives on Aug. 15, with an
economic growth target of five percent.

Defending his arguments, Bomer pointed out that besides the
initiation of the 2003 Year of Investment, no significant
progress had been made by the government to cope with the
unemployment issue, and that new foreign investments did not
really create any job opportunities this year.

"Many foreign investors have made divestments in the banking
sector, but this does not create any job opportunities. This
means the economic growth targeted to reach four percent this
year will mostly rely on consumption, which will contribute less
to job creation."

Bomer said that based on a recent study conducted by CLDS and
the International Labor Organization in Jakarta, an economy
mostly dependent on the consumption sector for growth was
expected to grow by three percent in 2004 and provide between
900,000 and 1.1 million new jobs.

To help cope with the serious unemployment problem, Bomer
said, the government's economic and non-economic policies should
be oriented to the creation of jobs.

"We need concrete measures and policies to lower risks for
foreign investments. All necessary measures should be taken to
repair Indonesia's image, which has been tarnished by increasing
terrorist attacks and separatism," he said.

Dradjad Wibowo, an economic analyst in Jakarta, and Riasto
Widiatmono, an economist from Diponegoro University in Semarang,
concurred and said the country would have difficulties in
reaching a five percent economic growth in 2004, particularly as
the IMF economic recovery program would end in December.

Riasto argued that an economic growth of five percent, even if
it was realized, would not automatically create jobs for the 2.5
million people entering the work force next year, because growth
was based on the consumption sector.

He said the central bank's efforts at lowering its benchmark
interest rate had failed to precipitate a similar decline in
credit interest rates at local banks, which would continue to
hinder development of the real sector.

Dradjad said many political parties would likely buy votes in
the next elections, and while this would improve the people's
purchasing power, it would simultaneously cause an increase in
the inflation rate.

View JSON | Print