meanwhile, back in the real world, Gita "Propellor Head" Wirjawan continues to be oblivious to the complete breakdown of systems within the office he heads (BKPM). the latest farce: due to ill-thought out changes he made to the investment permit system in January, the Manpower Dept is now refusing to issue work permits for new companies using the new documents. as of today, nearly 100 new companies are affected, and are dead in the water until their foreign principals can obtain work permits.
It’s a well known fact by now that, in order to achieve the growth it seeks, the current administration has set a target of Rp. 2,000 trillion per year in investment. Around 55 percent of this sum is expected to come from private capital, while the balance is expected to come from household spending (25 percent), government spending (14-15 percent), and financial institutions (7 percent).
The share of investment expected to be borne by private capital is enormous and frankly cannot be supplied by domestic sources alone.
Foreign direct investment (FDI) is by necessity needed to help meet the financing gap. While the level of FDI in Indonesia has only recently begun to show an upswing since the massive outflows of capital following the 1998 Asian financial crisis, much remains to be done to improve the investment climate before Indonesia can compete against its neighbors for a larger share of FDI.
The list of reforms that Indonesia must execute to more effectively attract FDI is fairly extensive but by no means unfeasible. In fact, while foreign investors always insist on strictly enforcing contract and zero tolerance for corruption, many privately concede that steps such as reducing conflicting regulations and relaxing land and labor laws would go very far toward pulling in FDI.
Indonesia’s Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) recognizes the task at hand. It is drafting a blueprint, entitled FDI Strategy Paper 2010, which outlines a set of reforms designed to assure foreign investors of certainty, consistency and credibility within the regulatory environment. Some of these long overdue changes have just been implemented, such as the one-stop service for licenses (PTSP) and the electronic automation portal (SPIPISE), while others will follow shortly, such as the further opening of the negative investment list (DNI) and the centralization of appointments to BKPM’s regional offices.
Part of the aim of this paper, which is based on the regular consultation BKPM has had and continues to have with foreign investors, chambers of commerce and industry associations, is to demonstrate how serious Indonesia is about its commitment to partnering with foreign investors.
All this fuss over FDI encompasses a larger concern that eclipses financing needs. Empirical evidence has shown that FDI can offer a bundle of extra-financial benefits to host economies. Cognizant of this ever-expanding effect, Indonesia targets not only a greater quantity but also better quality of FDI.
For Indonesia, quality is strictly defined as FDI that accomplishes one, some or all of the following; Reduced unemployment through skilled job creation: poverty alleviation, especially by lifting households straddling the poverty line; an improvement in social welfare, as measured by pertinent indicators
If FDI is viewed simply as capital originating from overseas, the question often posed is how can FDI achieve these clearly desirable outcomes? Generally, there are two main ways by which FDI offers more bang for the buck.
First, FDI acts as a signal. Because it is highly mobile and can locate itself in any host economy it chooses, FDI can speak volumes about the competitiveness of Indonesia’s investment climate. This, in turn, produces the pull necessary to further rev up Indonesia’s development engine.
Increased inflows of FDI compel NGOs, multinational institutions and ratings agencies to compare Indonesia favorably to other investment destinations and create a positive buzz. In addition, otherwise hesitant foreign investors start to take a closer look at Indonesia, in part due to what economists call a crowding-in effect. Improved perceptions of sovereign risk expand access to and lower the cost of capital, which would get many development projects off the ground.
Second, FDI can induce positive spillovers, including greater productivity, higher wages, broader formal sector employment, and knowledge and technology transfers. Of course certain country conditions must hold before such benefits can generally accrue to host economies. Still, Indonesia’s record shows that FDI has for the most part brought along this deeper social impact.
Now as Indonesia reaches for middle-income status, by seeking to move away from a commodity-based to an industrializing and thereafter a knowledge-based economy, the role of FDI has become even more important to policy design. Countries do not typically undergo this transition without a healthy influx of FDI precisely because it often strengthens domestic capacity. Successful attraction of FDI for this reason is clearly in Indonesia’s strategic interest.
But the window for Indonesia to capture a larger share of FDI for her development goals will not remain open indefinitely. A recent World Bank report finds that Indonesia’s so-called “demographic dividend”, the advantage Indonesia has in terms of a youthful population (of which over 50 percent is 30 years of age or younger) and low dependency ratio with respect to the workforce, will last for another decade.
By 2020 Indonesia will face a decline in consumer spending and increase in government outlays for entitlements as the population ages faster than the decrease in birth rates and increase in employment. To offset the potential strain on the state treasury, a reorientation from consumption, which has fueled Indonesia’s growth for decades, toward investment is needed now if Indonesia wants to restructure the composition of and safeguard the contributors to the economy.
To help Indonesians understand the salubrious effects of FDI on Indonesia’s development goals and the sense of urgency required to make it part of the realization of Indonesia’s development strategy, BKPM has launched an intensive socialization campaign, particularly in the provinces where local communities host FDI projects. After visiting 21 out of 33 provinces in less than two months, BKPM has selected as its first batch seven provincial governments (Riau, South Sumatra, West Java, East Java, East Kalimantan, West Nusa Tenggara and Papua) to serve as champions in part to help raise this critical consciousness.
As more stakeholders become aware of FDI’s importance to Indonesia’s future economic performance, Indonesia would be far better positioned to attract the level and type of FDI it seeks.
The writer is chairman of the Investment Coordinating Board. This column will appear regularly every two weeks.