Age 'does not count' in picking military boss
Age 'does not count' in picking military boss
The Jakarta Post, Jakarta
Coordinating Minister for Political and Security Affairs Susilo
Bambang Yudhoyono said on Sunday that age did not matter in the
selection of the Indonesian Military (TNI) chief.
Susilo said that it was quite a normal practice for the
President to extend a candidate's service beyond his or her
retirement date "when the country was in need".
"According to the law, an officer's period of service can be
extended by the President if the country needs the officer to
lead the military. The President considers many aspects ... but
age is not the deciding factor in the selection of the new TNI
chief," Susilo said.
The Defense Law passed by the House of Representatives last
November restricts the candidates for TNI chief to those with
experience as a chief of staff.
Of the four candidates eligible for the TNI top job, Army
Chief of Staff Gen. Endriartono Sutarto will reach mandatory
retirement age this April. His predecessor Gen. Tyasno Sudarto
and Air Force Chief of Staff Air Marshal Hanafie Asnan will only
retire next year, while Navy Chief of Staff Adm. Indroko
Sastrowiryono has had his service extended by a year.
Susilo also stressed that the agreement to rotate the highest
TNI position between the three military forces would not be
applied strictly.
"Rotation will be taken into consideration, but the quality
and readiness of the respective military force is also important.
The rotation does not necessarily mean that the Air Force must
take over from the Navy. The post could go to the Army before the
Air Force," he said.
Rotation of the top position in the military began under the
administration of former president Abdurrahman Wahid in 1999,
with the Navy being awarded the post through Adm. Widodo AS. If
the system were to be consistently applied, it would now be the
turn of the Air Force to get the top job.
In the past, the position was a quasi preserve of the Army.
Susilo said President Megawati Soekarnoputri was coming closer
to submitting TNI chief candidates to the House of
Representatives in the near future. The much-awaited change of
guard in the military would follow the latest TNI reshuffle which
affected 118 officers.
Rights activists saw the reshuffle, which was announced on
Friday evening, as an obstacle for the inquiry established by the
National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) into three
incidents in 1998 and 1999 here that killed dozens of students
and civilians.
Usman Hamid of the Commission on Missing Persons and Victims
of Violence (Kontras) told the Post on Sunday that the reshuffle
would discourage the inquiry's attempts to bring in military
officers allegedly involved in the incidents for questioning.
He was specifically referring to Maj. Gen, Sjafrie
Sjamsoeddin, who has been named the new TNI spokesman replacing
Rear Air Marshal Graito Usodo.
"How could the inquiry continue its work when one of the
officers being summoned for questioning now holds the strategic
position as spokesman for the military?" asked Usman, a member of
the Commission of Inquiry into Human Rights Violations (KPP HAM)
for the Trisakti, Semanggi I and Semanggi II incidents.
But military observer Kusnanto Anggoro of the Centre for
Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) said that the
appointment of Sjafrie as the TNI spokesman had nothing to do
with the widely hailed internal reform in the TNI or its stance
on human rights issues.
Kusnanto said that with or without Sjafrie's comeback to the
public spotlight after almost four years of absence, the
military's internal reform program had already come to a
standstill.
"I guess the appointment of Sjafrie to the position is merely
aimed at giving him lighter tasks rather than assigning him to
intelligence work," Kusnanto told The Jakarta Post on Sunday.
He said the public could not blame the military for its lack
of accountability over past human rights violations as the House
of Representatives itself had blocked the efforts to bring rights
abuse perpetrators to justice.
The House said last year the three incidents were not
classified as gross human rights violations.