A call for cooperation

I have enjoyed reading the wide views on colonialism recently expressed by Mr. Richardson, Mr. de Kort, Mr. de Jong, and lately Ms. Nanny Djali. The degree of emotion raised by this debate among all the writers indicates that strong feelings about this topic still exist, nearly half a century after its apparent end in Indonesia. This debate will probably continue among the writers and within the minds of reader without any respite, as has happened with similar other debates (e.g. the decision to ban Schindler's List) until some tired editor at The Jakarta Post decides enough is enough, and no longer accepts letters on the subject.

I wish to preempt this eventual action by posing some interesting questions to these writers and other readers: Knowing what we do from our past experience with colonialism, what have we learned to guide our present course of development? Has colonialism ended with the departure of the Dutch, or has it merely assumed new forms?

Ms. Nanny was quite correct when she wrote "Let's all look to the future, work together for a better world." Perhaps all of these writers should unite in purpose, first to describe the dynamics of neo-colonialism, and then make some corrective suggestions. For example, Ms. Nanny's knowledge of the "high culture" found in the past kingdoms can be used to explain the present, oftentimes exploitive and chauvinistic relationship between Java and the outer islands.

Her experience of injustices faced at the hands of the old Dutchmen might be channeled to identify those who now fill this role as orang Belanda baru (new Dutchmen).

Just as importantly, Mr. de Kort's knowledge of the role played by international trade in development might be used to trace the way transitional corporations are turning the world into a frontier for cheap labor and raw materials, all the while promising future developmental bliss by the invisible hand of open markets. Every time a new corporate headquarters rears its terrible glass and steel brow against the Jakarta skyline, how many ruined forests, seas, and human lives result?

Once the dynamics of neo-colonialism have been modeled by our able team of thinkers, they might shine the light of wisdom forward for us. Mr. Richardson, our resident expert on morally correct colonialism, could give counsel to the powerful so that their erroneous ways might be mended. But for now, writers, enough seething emotion over the past. We wish to hear more of how you might tackle the challenges of the present, and eagerly await your letters.

STEPHEN KRECIK

Jakarta