{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1362530,
        "msgid": "whistle-blowing-prosecutor-may-face-jail-for-fraud-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-04-25 00:00:00",
        "title": "Whistle-blowing prosecutor may face jail for fraud",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Whistle-blowing prosecutor may face jail for fraud The Jakarta Post, Jakarta The South Jakarta District Court was requested on Thursday to sentence prosecutor Kito Irkhamni to four-months in jail for alleged fraud involving Rp 480 million. Prosecutor Zaenuddin told the court, presided over by I Dewa Gde Putra, that Kito, who is also a housing contractor, deceived Aty Mulyati in connection with the construction of her house in Cinere, South Jakarta, in 2000.",
        "content": "<p>Whistle-blowing prosecutor may face jail for fraud<\/p>\n<p>The Jakarta Post, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>The South Jakarta District Court was requested on Thursday to<br>\nsentence prosecutor Kito Irkhamni to four-months in jail for<br>\nalleged fraud involving Rp 480 million.<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor Zaenuddin told the court, presided over by I Dewa<br>\nGde Putra, that Kito, who is also a housing contractor, deceived<br>\nAty Mulyati in connection with the construction of her house in<br>\nCinere, South Jakarta, in 2000.<\/p>\n<p>He said that the defendant violated articles 372 and 378 of<br>\nthe Criminal Code on embezzlement and fraud. The articles carry a<br>\nmaximum penalty of four years in jail.<\/p>\n<p>Late last year, Kito made headlines when he revealed that a<br>\nproperty asset belonging to Attorney General M.A. Rachman had not<br>\nbeen reported to the Public Servants' Wealth Audit Commission<br>\n(KPKPN). He said that Rachman had asked him to buy a plot of land<br>\nin Cinere and to build a house there. Kito said that Rachman<br>\nstill owed him money for it.<\/p>\n<p>Prosecutor Zainuddin said that on Jan. 31, 2000, Kito agreed<br>\nto build Ati's house in Cinere, South Jakarta, at a cost of Rp<br>\n390 million. On the same day, Ati gave him Rp 300 million. The<br>\nrest was handed over between March and May.<\/p>\n<p>Kito managed to complete only half of the work, said the<br>\nprosecutor.<\/p>\n<p>On Aug. 6, the defendant asked Ati for another Rp 120 million,<br>\nbut Ati gave him Rp 20 million. Later in the month, Kito received<br>\nanother Rp 70 million from Ati.<\/p>\n<p>The construction of the house, however, was never completed,<br>\nZainuddin said.<\/p>\n<p>Kito had earlier told the court that he did not complete the<br>\nwork because the house had been sold by Ati to another party.<\/p>\n<p>Before the case reached court, Kito had made a complaint to<br>\nthe National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) following<br>\nhis suspension as a staff member from the office of the deputy<br>\nattorney general for general crimes. Attorney General Rachman<br>\nreportedly made the decision because Kito had refused to be<br>\ntransferred to South Sumatra.<\/p>\n<p>The dispute became more intense when Kito disclosed Rachman's<br>\nhouse in Cinere, which had not been declared by Rachman in his<br>\nreport to KPKPN.<\/p>\n<p>Rachman was in the media spotlight following Kito's statement,<br>\nand public demands increased for his resignation. However,<br>\nRachman claimed that the house in question belonged to his<br>\ndaughter and had been sold to a businessman.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/whistle-blowing-prosecutor-may-face-jail-for-fraud-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}