{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1128298,
        "msgid": "what-can-indonesia-learn-from-india-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-09-12 00:00:00",
        "title": "What can Indonesia learn from India?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "What can Indonesia learn from India? Aziz, Munich Does the name Lakhsmi Mittal ring a bell? Well, maybe not (and never mind if it doesn't). First it is a he, not a she. Second, he is not a Bollywood movie star, though he is certainly a kind of star in his own league.",
        "content": "<p>What can Indonesia learn from India?<\/p>\n<p>Aziz, Munich<\/p>\n<p>Does the name Lakhsmi Mittal ring a bell? Well, maybe not (and<br>\nnever mind if it doesn't). First it is a he, not a she. Second,<br>\nhe is not a Bollywood movie star, though he is certainly a kind<br>\nof star in his own league.<\/p>\n<p>Forbes magazine has just crowned him as one of the richest<br>\npersons in the world with an estimated wealth of US$25 billion,<br>\ntrailing behind the other two more familiar and already famous<br>\nnames, Warren Buffet in second place and Bill Gates in first.<br>\nMittal's story (he is the owner of the largest steel firm on the<br>\nplanet) marks one of the milestones of the rise of Indian<br>\nentrepreneurs following the success of many Indian professionals<br>\nin business around the world.<\/p>\n<p>Consider Ajay Banja. He started his career in Nestle in India,<br>\nwhere one of his jobs was getting up at 4 a.m. to collect milk<br>\nfrom nearby dairy farms. Then he moved to PepsiCo's restaurant<br>\ngroup and later on joined Citigroup in 1996. He was transferred<br>\nto the United States in 2000 and became president of North<br>\nAmerica retail banking two years afterwards. Just recently, he<br>\nwas appointed as a co-director of the global retail banking<br>\ngroup, together with Steven Freiberg; a position second only to<br>\nthe number one in Citigroup.<\/p>\n<p>We have become used to seeing Indian faces occupying top jobs<br>\nabroad. The sub-continent's executives, bankers, scientists,<br>\nwriters, journalists, thinkers, venture capitalists and even<br>\nmovie stars and cinematographers have been steadily gaining<br>\nrecognition around the world. Not to mention the massive numbers<br>\nworking in the Indian IT industry, which has become something of<br>\na trademark of the new India. The graduates of Indian institutes<br>\nof technology (IIT) and their counterparts in the management<br>\nfield (IIM) never have to worry about getting jobs, but rather<br>\nare more preoccupied with deciding on which job they will pick<br>\nafter they leave school.<\/p>\n<p>The list of successes goes on, but what we need to immediately<br>\nask ourselves is what factors have made them successful and why<br>\nIndonesia cannot do the same thing. Why? Are Indonesians not<br>\nsmart enough?<\/p>\n<p>A tempting question, indeed. But unfortunately, it is at best<br>\nirrelevant and at worst misleading. The main reason behind the<br>\nsuccess of Indian professionals and entrepreneurs is that they<br>\nare more assertive, or talkative, than most other Asians.<\/p>\n<p>This might be attributed to the language they speak (English),<br>\nwhich leads, directly or indirectly, to greater self-confidence.<br>\nPeople can easily ignore the importance of self-confidence and<br>\nassertiveness, but these traits play significant roles outside of<br>\nIndonesia.<\/p>\n<p>Just like many Javanese still call every white foreigner a<br>\nLondo (literally, a Dutchman), ignoring the fact that he may not<br>\neven know where Holland is, it is also difficult for people from<br>\noutside East Asia to tell the difference between, for instance, a<br>\nJapanese and a Chinese. And being unassertive doesn't help. \"Low<br>\nprofile, low profit, high profile, high profit\"; that seems to be<br>\nthe rule in international competition. There is a fine line<br>\nbetween keeping a low profile and humility, and failure to make a<br>\ndistinction between the two only leads to greater failure.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, English language capabilities is certainly an important<br>\ncontributing factor. In retrospect, the economic and political<br>\ndevelopment of some former British colonies has been dramatic,<br>\nand they have managed to take their places among the middle- and<br>\nupper-income bracket nations, like Singapore and Malaysia. Other<br>\nformer colonies and English-speaking countries like Australia,<br>\nNew Zealand and Ireland (the latter has consistently recorded the<br>\nfastest growth in the European Union for almost the last two<br>\ndecades), have also performed very well.<\/p>\n<p>The domination of English as the international language,<br>\nthanks to the former British empire and current U.S. \"empire\", in<br>\nthe education, political, economic and cultural fields, has given<br>\nan advantage to the workforces of these countries. Indonesia,<br>\nwhich hastily and imprudently scrapped the Dutch language right<br>\nafter independence, and failed to replace it with English or even<br>\nArabic, has had to pay a hefty price. Being bilingual or<br>\nmultilingual has become a basic necessity if one wants to compete<br>\nand there is no way around this.<\/p>\n<p>Building image is the next big thing. When the top three<br>\nimages of Indonesia among people abroad are the tsunami,<br>\nterrorism and corruption, it takes twice as much work to<br>\noverhaul these impressions. Another example, Indonesia was in 4th<br>\nplace in terms of Erasmus Mundus scholarship recipients (nine<br>\nscholars) in 2004, with India coming 6th (five scholars). While<br>\nthe number of recipients from Indonesia this year increased to 14<br>\nscholars, India jumped to the top of the table with 137 scholars,<br>\nleaving Indonesia well behind in 14th place.<\/p>\n<p>But one might ask how India can produce the third richest man<br>\non the planet while hundreds of millions out of its population of<br>\none billion still live in poverty? Or how in Bangalore, the<br>\ncenter of the IT industry, poor parents have to bribe health<br>\nworkers with between $7 and $12 (equivalent to average weekly<br>\npay) before health workers will let them see their newborn<br>\nchildren? How can these glaring contrasts be reconciled?<\/p>\n<p>Well, first things first. We have millions of poor people<br>\nourselves, and, besides, they are working to solve the problem.<br>\nSecond, would it be better: a) to have millions of poor people<br>\nand not have world class executives and entrepreneurs or b) to<br>\nhave millions of poor people but also have world class executives<br>\nand entrepreneurs?<\/p>\n<p>How long will we continue to allow the world to laugh at us,<br>\nthe fourth most populous country in the world? How come that when<br>\nthe world talks about \"the new superpowers\" from Asia, it always<br>\nrefers to China and India, the first and second most populous<br>\ncountries in the world, but never mentions Indonesia, the world's<br>\nthird most populous nation? It would appear that our two hundred<br>\nand twenty million people are nothing more than empty numbers and<br>\nstatistics.<\/p>\n<p>China, India and Indonesia all have the advantage of young<br>\npopulations. Japan and South Korea can now sniff trouble in the<br>\nair as their populations age and are beginning to ask whether the<br>\nnext generation will be able to support the elderly when that<br>\ntime comes.<\/p>\n<p>While aging populations are a big problem in developed<br>\ncountries, what is likely to happen in Indonesia? If the present<br>\nyounger generation is not equipped to get the economy moving, the<br>\nfuture will be bleak: There will be simply no resources to<br>\nsustain our current standard of living (which is already low) and<br>\nto repay our debts. In short, we are talking about a failed<br>\nnation.<\/p>\n<p>We can avoid this tragedy by starting to learn from others. We<br>\noften hear people saying we cannot learn from Singapore because<br>\nit is just a small country. Others say we cannot learn from China<br>\nor India because they are too big. Or that America is way too<br>\nadvanced to be copied. Hundreds of excuses can be made to allow<br>\nus to put off learning from others, but what's the point?<br>\nCriticizing others does not make us a better nation. Unless we<br>\nwork as hard as they do, we will end up on the road to nowhere.<\/p>\n<p>With regard to bilingual education in Indonesia, some experts<br>\nhave been debating the initiatives taken by some schools, or lack<br>\nthereof, as summarized by Pieter Van Der Vienhart (The myth of<br>\nnational plus schools in RI, The Jakarta Post, Sept. 3, 2005). To<br>\nwhich we might want to recall the old adage, \"If you wait for<br>\neverything to be perfect, you will never get anything done.\"<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a postgraduate student in sustainable resource<br>\nmanagement, Technical University of Munich. He can be reached at<br>\naziz9672@yahoo.com.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/what-can-indonesia-learn-from-india-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}