{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1666083,
        "msgid": "war-at-the-negotiating-table-1775713852",
        "date": "2026-04-09 12:04:09",
        "title": "War at the Negotiating Table",
        "author": "Budi Raharjo",
        "source": "REPUBLIKA",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Politics",
        "summary": "In a surprising diplomatic twist after 40 days of conflict, US President Donald Trump announced a two-week pause in attacks on Iran, framing it as a strategic coordination with Pakistan's leadership rather than a retreat, while claiming all military objectives have been met. Iran counters that this pause is a negotiation breather following their acceptance of Tehran's core principles, with talks hosted in Islamabad under Pakistani facilitation, positioning the standoff as a shift from battlefield to diplomatic arena. This development elevates Pakistan's role in Middle East peacemaking and underscores the fragile path to a lasting resolution amid deep mutual distrust.",
        "content": "<p>Joko Sembung rides the tram,<\/p>\n<p>Not connecting to Trump\u2019s direction.<\/p>\n<p>If there were a competition for the most diplomatic statement that\nfeels like an evasion, the trophy would probably be delivered straight\nto the White House that day without needing judges. The evasion is like\nthe pantun above.<\/p>\n<p>Precisely on the fortieth day of the war, United States President\nDonald Trump delivered something that, if read slowly, feels like an\nannouncement of victory slipped into the language of defeat.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the phrase \u201cwe lost\u201d never appeared. How could a country\nas vast as America, which is not alone but ganging up with Israel,\nsuddenly admit to being subdued by Iran standing solo?<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s like a giant slipping on a banana peel, then saying: \u201cI\nintentionally fell to test gravity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>However, as often happens in global politics, reality does not always\nreside within the official text. It often leaks from the gaps in the\nnarrative.<\/p>\n<p>In his official statement, Trump constructed a narrative that sounds\nneat, almost like a report of success wrapped in caution.<\/p>\n<p>He stated that the decision to halt attacks for two weeks was taken\nafter communication with Pakistan\u2019s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and\nArmy Chief Asim Munir.<\/p>\n<p>He seemed to want to emphasise that the step was not a retreat, but\nthe result of strategic coordination.<\/p>\n<p>Trump also stressed that America had \u201cachieved and even exceeded\u201d all\nits military targets.<\/p>\n<p>That is a sentence that sounds bold, though it precisely invites\nquestions: if all targets have been achieved, why the pause for\nnegotiations?<\/p>\n<p>He then mentioned a ten-point proposal from Iran deemed \u201cworkable\u201d as\nthe basis for talks, while implying that nearly all long-standing\ndispute points have found common ground.<\/p>\n<p>In this frame, the two-week pause is positioned not as pressure, but\nas space for finalisation towards long-term peace in the Middle\nEast.<\/p>\n<p>That is Trump\u2019s narrative which, if read at a glance, feels like a\ndiplomatic victory, but if pondered longer, leaves an echo of unanswered\nquestions.<\/p>\n<p>Iran responded to the statement with a far more detailed version,\nalmost like opening \u201cfootnotes\u201d deliberately hidden.<\/p>\n<p>From Tehran\u2019s perspective, what is called a \u201ctwo-week ceasefire\u201d is\nnot a war pause in the sense of peace, but a negotiation pause.<\/p>\n<p>That pause becomes breathing room to formulate agreement details,\nafter the opposing side\u2014in this case America\u2014accepted the basic\nprinciples proposed by Iran.<\/p>\n<p>This is where the stage becomes intriguing. The negotiations are not\ntaking place in Washington, nor in Tehran, but in Islamabad. And the\nmatchmaker is not an old-school Western diplomat, but Pakistan\u2019s Prime\nMinister Shehbaz Sharif.<\/p>\n<p>In its official speech, Iran\u2019s Supreme National Security Council\nspoke not in a tone of doubt, but with confidence almost resembling a\ndelayed victory declaration.<\/p>\n<p>They described the 40-day war as a phase that has brought the enemy\nto a deadlock, even forcing the opponent to seek an exit through\ndiplomatic channels.<\/p>\n<p>In Tehran\u2019s narrative, the decision to enter the negotiating table is\nnot a form of fatigue, but a continuation of battlefield victory that\nwants to be \u201clocked in\u201d as a political win.<\/p>\n<p>They emphasised that the two-week pause is not the end of the war,\nbut part of a longer strategy.<\/p>\n<p>At that point, every agreement detail must submit to the ten\nprinciples they proposed, from lifting sanctions to withdrawing foreign\ntroops from the region.<\/p>\n<p>With a firm yet cold tone, Iran also reminded that these negotiations\nare taking place in an atmosphere of full distrust, and that their hand\nremains on the trigger.<\/p>\n<p>They are ready to return to the field if the opponent deviates even\nslightly from the agreement.<\/p>\n<p>Thus is Iran\u2019s speech which, instead of closing the war, actually\nemphasises that the battle has merely shifted arenas, from the thunder\nof weapons to diplomatic tension.<\/p>\n<p>The world suddenly feels like a geopolitical soap opera: two sides\nthat hammered each other for 40 days, now willing to sit face-to-face,\naccompanied by a \u201cpeacemaker\u201d who was previously not much in the\nspotlight.<\/p>\n<p>Pakistan, which has so far more often been a field of influence\ntug-of-war, suddenly rises in class to become a historic\nfacilitator.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/war-at-the-negotiating-table-1775713852",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}