{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1264915,
        "msgid": "us-court-rules-pertamina-in-contempt-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-04-06 00:00:00",
        "title": "U.S. court rules Pertamina in contempt",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "U.S. court rules Pertamina in contempt Moch. N. Kurniawan, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta The U.S. District Court in Houston, Texas, has issued a contempt order against the state-owned oil and gas firm Pertamina for using a Jakarta court to avoid paying damages to foreign controlled power company Karaha Bodas Co. LLC. \"It's extraordinary for a U.S. court to find a civil party in contempt, and it does so when a party's actions are extreme and egregious.",
        "content": "<p>U.S. court rules Pertamina in contempt<\/p>\n<p>Moch. N. Kurniawan, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. District Court in Houston, Texas, has issued a contempt<br>\norder against the state-owned oil and gas firm Pertamina for<br>\nusing a Jakarta court to avoid paying damages to foreign<br>\ncontrolled power company Karaha Bodas Co. LLC.<\/p>\n<p>\"It's extraordinary for a U.S. court to find a civil party in<br>\ncontempt, and it does so when a party's actions are extreme and<br>\negregious.<\/p>\n<p>\"This shows once again that Pertamina and Indonesia appear to<br>\nbe willing to do whatever they can to avoid their legal<br>\nobligations,\" Karaha legal counsel Chris Dugan said in statement<br>\nreleased on Thursday to The Jakarta Post.<\/p>\n<p>Pertamina and Karaha have been involved in a legal bout over a<br>\ngeothermal power project which was suspended by the government in<br>\n1998 due to the country's economic crisis.<\/p>\n<p>The suspension of the project prompted Karaha, which claims it<br>\nhas invested more than US$100 million, to file for arbitration<br>\nwith a Switzerland-based arbitration body. The U.S.-controlled<br>\npower firm won the case in 2000, under which the arbitration<br>\nboard ruled that Pertamina should pay some $261 million in<br>\ncompensation. The ruling was latter confirmed by the Houston<br>\nDistrict Court.<\/p>\n<p>But instead of abiding by the ruling, Pertamina brought<br>\nproceedings in a Jakarta court, which on Monday issued the<br>\nsurprising decision of annulling the award made by the<br>\ninternational arbitration body.<\/p>\n<p>The next day, the Houston court declared Pertamina in<br>\ncontempt.<\/p>\n<p>Pertamina declined to comment on the U.S. court ruling.<\/p>\n<p>Company spokesman Ridwan Nyak Baik would only say that<br>\nPertamina wanted to settle the dispute with Karaha in an<br>\nIndonesian court as the project was subject to Indonesian law.<\/p>\n<p>\"One of the clauses in the contract stipulates that the<br>\ngoverning law is Indonesian Law.<\/p>\n<p>\"Therefore, every dispute must use Indonesian Law,\" he told<br>\nthe Post.<\/p>\n<p>Dugan urged Pertamina to honor the arbitration ruling.<\/p>\n<p>He said that at present Bank of America and Bank of New York<br>\nhad frozen over $200 million belonging to Pertamina as part of<br>\nthe effort to recover the damages.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/us-court-rules-pertamina-in-contempt-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}