{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1000187,
        "msgid": "unfamiliar-abbreviations-creeping-into-apec-forum-1447893297",
        "date": "1994-11-09 00:00:00",
        "title": "Unfamiliar abbreviations creeping into APEC forum",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Unfamiliar abbreviations creeping into APEC forum By Endy Bayuni JAKARTA (JP): In the beginning, there was just APEC ... Now the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, which is entering its sixth year, has created a host of abbreviations, which its officials feel at ease with, but which are mindboggling to those not familiar with APEC.",
        "content": "<p>Unfamiliar abbreviations creeping into APEC forum<\/p>\n<p>By Endy Bayuni<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): In the beginning, there was just APEC ...<\/p>\n<p>Now the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, which<br>\nis entering its sixth year, has created a host of abbreviations,<br>\nwhich its officials feel at ease with, but which are mindboggling<br>\nto those not familiar with APEC.<\/p>\n<p>Amid the intensive debate within APEC on the merits (and<br>\ndrawbacks) of institutionalizing the forum, or on how rapidly (or<br>\nslowly) they want the forum to become a formally structured<br>\norganization, one thing is for sure -- the use of abbreviations<br>\nand acronyms is being institutionalized by APEC bureaucrats.<\/p>\n<p>Now, with APEC dominating the pages of national and<br>\ninternational newspapers, their reporters will have to struggle<br>\nthrough the alphabet soup of three-letter or four-letter<br>\nabbreviations and acronyms and try to decipher these and make<br>\nthem comprehensible for their readers.<\/p>\n<p>From the now familiar ASEAN, EPG, EAEC, the list of<br>\nabbreviations has proliferated. Among the latest additions are<br>\nAELM, CTI, ETI.<\/p>\n<p>As abbreviation and acronym making is considered a favorite<br>\npast time for Indonesians, no doubt some of the additions have<br>\nbeen made by Indonesia, which is chairing the forum this year.<\/p>\n<p>And more abbreviations will be created no doubt in the coming<br>\nyears as institutionalization creeps up on APEC and as<br>\nbureaucrats establish more and more meetings to liberalize trade<br>\nin the region.<\/p>\n<p>Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) itself, as many<br>\nofficials willingly admit, constitutes poor usage of English<br>\nbecause it is an incomplete phrase. Because of this, the proper<br>\nusage is APEC forum.<\/p>\n<p>&quot;We adopted APEC because it sounded good,&quot; remarked an<br>\nIndonesian official familiar with the history of the forum.<\/p>\n<p>Those who cannot accept the violation of language principles<br>\nmight not have to wait too long before they see a change. The<br>\nUnited States has been trying to convert the forum&apos;s name into<br>\nthe Asia Pacific Economic Community, still APEC for short, but at<br>\nleast good English.<\/p>\n<p>Political sensitivity also determines the way the<br>\nabbreviations are created in APEC.<\/p>\n<p>Not wanting to offend China, APEC views its membership as an<br>\neconomic entity not defined by states or governments. This has<br>\nallowed the forum to recruit China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, which<br>\nis officially referred to as Chinese Taipei, at the same time.<\/p>\n<p>This means, however, that the meeting of APEC leaders, first<br>\nheld in Blake Island in Seattle, the United States, last<br>\nNovember, cannot be called a summit, because that would offend<br>\nChina. It was then officially called the informal meeting of APEC<br>\nleaders, or the &quot;leadership&quot; meeting for second reference. It was<br>\nnot a summit.<\/p>\n<p>Now with Indonesia preparing to host the second such meeting<br>\nin nearby Bogor on Nov. 15, the host nation has come up with the<br>\nacronym &quot;AELM&quot; which stands for APEC Economic Leaders Meeting.<br>\nAgain, as in the case of Blake Island, anyone trying to portray<br>\nthe meeting as a summit will quickly earn official wrath.<\/p>\n<p>But there is no problem with the lesser level meetings. The<br>\nsenior officials meeting, now already underway, is described as<br>\nsuch and given the initials SOM. The ministerial meeting is also<br>\ncalled just that although, for some unexplained reason, no one<br>\nhas bothered to make up an abbreviation for it.<\/p>\n<p>Identity<\/p>\n<p>The term &quot;ASEAN&quot; will likely creep into most APEC press<br>\narticles because the Association of Southeast Asian Nations has<br>\ncontinued to maintain its identity within APEC.<\/p>\n<p>Its six members -- Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the<br>\nPhilippines, Singapore and Thailand -- insisted when they joined<br>\nAPEC in 1989 that the group must not be diluted. As a concession<br>\nfor its joining, ASEAN won the right to host the APEC meetings<br>\nevery other year.<\/p>\n<p>Now ASEAN is also lobbying to establish another, larger caucus<br>\nwithin APEC, called the EAEC, which stands for East Asia Economic<br>\nCaucus. But the idea has been shot down by the &quot;Caucasian&quot; or the<br>\n&quot;non-Asian&quot; members of APEC, particularly the United States. The<br>\nEAEC is expected to link the six ASEAN countries with Japan,<br>\nSouth Korea, China, Taiwan and Hong Kong.<\/p>\n<p>The institutionalization of APEC also means the creation of<br>\nworking groups, committees and sub-committees, all of which are,<br>\nor will, sooner or later, be referred to in their three-letter or<br>\nfour-letter abbreviations and acronyms.<\/p>\n<p>CTI stands for Committee on Trade and Investment. There is<br>\nalso the ETI (Economic Trends and Issues) working group. In APEC,<br>\neven the issues are abbreviated. Examples are: SME (Small and<br>\nMedium Enterprises), AAMA (Administration Aspects of Market<br>\nAccess) and TRIM (Trade Related Investment Measures), RTL<br>\n(Regional Trade Liberalization).<\/p>\n<p>Then there are also the supporting organizations within and<br>\noutside of APEC.<\/p>\n<p>The PECC is the Pacific Economic Cooperation Council, a<br>\ntripartite forum grouping representatives from Asia-Pacific<br>\nbusiness, government and academic communities.<\/p>\n<p>There is also the EPG, or the Eminent Persons Group of APEC,<br>\nwhich is mandated to look into issues, particularly in trade<br>\nliberalization, on behalf of the forum.<\/p>\n<p>After presenting two reports, its future hinges on this week&apos;s<br>\nAPEC ministerial meeting, which will decide whether the ministers<br>\nhave any more use for the group, given that the forum has<br>\nestablished committees which could undertake the study and<br>\nprepare reports similar to those by the EPG.<\/p>\n<p>Whatever decision is made in Jakarta, Japan, as the next APEC<br>\nchairman beginning in 1995, is already considering the<br>\nestablishment of another group, called the Group of Eminent and<br>\nExperienced Persons. Since this has yet to be accepted at APEC,<br>\nthere is no acronym for it ... at least for the time being.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/unfamiliar-abbreviations-creeping-into-apec-forum-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}