{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1422826,
        "msgid": "un-needs-to-take-new-initiative-1447893297",
        "date": "1999-12-04 00:00:00",
        "title": "UN needs to take new initiative",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "UN needs to take new initiative By Agus Tarmidzi and Imron Cotan JAKARTA (JP): When the Cold War era closed its final chapter, many enthusiastically predicted that the world would then be pacified and, hence, conflicts would also become a thing of the past. History has accurately recorded the fact that the international community has been successful in avoiding a head-on collision between the superpowers.",
        "content": "<p>UN needs to take new initiative<\/p>\n<p>By Agus Tarmidzi and Imron Cotan<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): When the Cold War era closed its final chapter,<br>\nmany enthusiastically predicted that the world would then be<br>\npacified and, hence, conflicts would also become a thing of the<br>\npast.<\/p>\n<p>History has accurately recorded the fact that the<br>\ninternational community has been successful in avoiding a head-on<br>\ncollision between the superpowers. We, however, failed to contain<br>\nthe emergence of the new types of conflicts originating inter<br>\nalia from racial hatred, religious discord and ethnic animosity.<br>\nSome have occurred within internationally recognized boundaries<br>\nof a sovereign state, while others have crossed national<br>\nboundaries.<\/p>\n<p>These conflicts have caused the loss of life of many innocent<br>\npeople and incalculable material damages. Worse still, while<br>\nwasting the already infinite natural resources, these conflicts<br>\nalso provided grounds for irresponsible elements to flagrantly<br>\nviolate the human rights upon which the fundamental fabric of<br>\nsociety is based.<\/p>\n<p>At the global level, many attempts have been taken to prevent<br>\nsuch tragedies from continuously unfolding. Boutros-Boutros<br>\nGhali, the former United Nations secretary-general, introduced<br>\n\"An Agenda for Peace\" as a road map to preserve and promote<br>\ninternational peace and security. The agenda contained the<br>\nconcept of \"peacekeeping, peacemaking and peace-building\", which<br>\nrequired the settlement of any conflicts by using peaceful means<br>\nin accordance with the principles contained in the UN Charter.<\/p>\n<p>The objectives were indeed noble. Unfortunately, the<br>\ninitiative went unheeded, for members of this global organization<br>\ndiffered on how to implement the concept. The expensively<br>\nprohibitive costs incurred by such peacekeeping, peacemaking and<br>\npeace-building activities had sent the concept to its final rest.<\/p>\n<p>As we witness the conflicts continue unabated. It is for this<br>\nparticular reason that UN secretary-general Kofi Annan recently<br>\nintroduced a new concept of \"humanitarian intervention\". It<br>\nenvisages that the international community, the UN in particular,<br>\nshould be able to intervene in any conflicts around the world to<br>\nsave the lives of innocent people, to protect human rights as<br>\nwell as to put off and find solutions to the prevailing<br>\nconflicts.<\/p>\n<p>Developing countries have cautiously studied this initiative,<br>\nfor they would obviously be at the receiving end of such<br>\nhumanitarian intervention for at least the following reasons:<br>\nfirst, conflicts normally occur in the developing countries,<br>\nsecond, humanitarian intervention cannot successfully be<br>\nperformed without military backups, and, third, humanitarian<br>\nintervention can only be performed against the developing<br>\ncountries.<\/p>\n<p>This is because developed countries -- especially those<br>\npermanent members of the UN Security Council -- will block any<br>\ndecisions to conduct such an operation in their own backyards.<br>\nThere is no doubt that Russia, for instance, will veto any<br>\ndecision of the UN Security Council to conduct a humanitarian<br>\nintervention in Chechnya or in the Ingushtia Republics.<\/p>\n<p>Another issue of similar importance over which the world has<br>\nso far failed to properly address is nuclear disarmament. We have<br>\nrecently been confronted with an unprecedented phenomenon in<br>\nwhich two archrivals in the South Asian region, Pakistan and<br>\nIndia, finally posited themselves as the new nuclear-weapon<br>\nstates.<\/p>\n<p>While adding a new dimension to the regional political<br>\ninteractions, this mere fact has furthermore cast doubts over the<br>\nachievement of nuclear disarmament under strict and effective<br>\ninternational control, as required by the 3rd UN Special Session<br>\nSpecially Devoted to Nuclear Disarmament (1978), and the<br>\nobjectives and principles agreed upon in the Conference of Non-<br>\nProliferation of Nuclear Weapons (1995).<\/p>\n<p>The situation becomes more alarming for the two major nuclear<br>\nweapon states, the United States and Russia, have continued to<br>\ndevelop their nuclear technology. The world was stunned when the<br>\nmedia reported that the United States had managed to produce a<br>\nprototype of a mini-nuclear warhead (W-88) which could be used to<br>\nachieve a limited military target. The three major nuclear weapon<br>\nstates, especially China, will certainly use this discouraging<br>\ndevelopment as a pretext to develop their own \"mini-nukes\". A new<br>\nnuclear arms race now looms large, making it almost impossible to<br>\nachieve nuclear disarmament.<\/p>\n<p>The efforts of the United States to review the Anti-Ballistic<br>\nMissiles Treaty (ABM Treaty) and the failure of this country to<br>\nratify the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) have<br>\nfurthermore aggravated the situation. As a sign of<br>\nrelentlessness, Russia has recently conducted a missile test<br>\ncapable of carrying multiple nuclear warheads. If the<br>\ninternational community fails to check these worrisome<br>\ndevelopments, the reemergence of a new round of Cold War will be<br>\nunavoidable.<\/p>\n<p>In short, as the new millennium inches nearer, the world is<br>\nstill being confronted with conflicts with ethnic, racial,<br>\nreligious and human rights notions and, second, a nuclear arms<br>\nrace which may trigger a new Cold War. It is therefore timely for<br>\nthe UN to ponder organizing a \"millennium summit\" to deal with<br>\nall the remaining issues of the 20th century in which all<br>\ncountries could, on an equal footing, participate in charting the<br>\nfuture of our planet. The summit's agenda should be overarching,<br>\ncovering social, economic, environmental, and political issues<br>\nincluding the two most pressing issues identified earlier.<\/p>\n<p>If the UN manages to organize the summit, we may hope the<br>\nworld would be a safer place to live in the next millennium.<\/p>\n<p>Agus Tarmidzi is former Indonesian ambassador\/permanent<br>\nRepresentative to the UN Office in Vienna and Geneva Switzerland<br>\nrespectively. Imron Cotan is currently the deputy assistant state<br>\nsecretary for political affairs.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/un-needs-to-take-new-initiative-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}