{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1980349,
        "msgid": "ui-academic-urges-indonesia-to-adopt-risk-based-ai-regulation-1789455437",
        "date": "2026-09-15 13:20:27",
        "title": "UI academic urges Indonesia to adopt risk-based AI regulation",
        "author": "",
        "source": "ANTARA_ID",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Regulation",
        "summary": "Parulian Paidi Aritonang, Dean of the University of Indonesia's Faculty of Law, has called for Indonesia to strengthen risk-based artificial intelligence regulation, citing the EU AI Act as a reference though not a blueprint. He noted Indonesia currently lacks a comprehensive AI law and that existing sectoral rules on electronic systems and personal data could serve as entry points for governance.",
        "content": "<p>The European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) can serve\nas a reference for Indonesia in designing risk-based AI regulation, but\nthat does not mean the model must be applied identically.<\/p>\n<p>Purwokerto (ANTARA) - Parulian Paidi Aritonang, an academic from the\nUniversity of Indonesia, has urged Indonesia to strengthen risk-based\nartificial intelligence (AI) regulation by taking global regulatory\ndevelopments as one of its references.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe European Union Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) can serve\nas a reference for Indonesia in designing risk-based AI regulation, but\nthat does not mean the model must be applied identically,\u201d said Parulian\nat the 4th International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social\nJustice (ICOLGAS) 2026 in Purwokerto, Banyumas Regency, Central Java, on\nTuesday.<\/p>\n<p>The Dean of the UI Faculty of Law explained that a risk-based\napproach is needed to differentiate AI use according to the level of\nrisk involved, ranging from prohibited practices, high-risk systems, and\ntransparency obligations, to low-risk uses.<\/p>\n<p>According to him, the regulatory framework must also govern\nobligations for high-risk AI systems, including risk management, data\ngovernance, technical documentation, record-keeping, human oversight,\naccuracy, system resilience, and cybersecurity.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat needs attention is not merely the technology, but how emerging\nrisks can be identified, controlled, and monitored through a clear legal\nframework,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, he said there are specific obligations for\ngeneral-purpose AI (GPAI), including technical documentation, copyright\npolicies, and summaries of the materials used in training.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Indonesia to date has no single comprehensive law\nspecifically governing AI in the way the EU AI Act does.<\/p>\n<p>According to Parulian, a number of existing regulations could serve\nas entry points for AI governance, including provisions on electronic\nsystems and personal data processing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIndonesia needs to assess whether the existing sectoral approach is\nsufficient or whether it should move towards risk-based AI governance,\u201d\nhe said.<\/p>\n<p>Parulian also highlighted the importance of governance and law\nenforcement, encompassing oversight, conformity assessments,\nregistration, post-market monitoring of systems, incident reporting, and\nthe imposition of sanctions.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat way, strengthening AI regulation is directed not only at\nencouraging innovation, but also at ensuring that the technology is used\nresponsibly through adequate oversight and protection mechanisms,\u201d he\nsaid.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/ui-academic-urges-indonesia-to-adopt-risk-based-ai-regulation-1789455437",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}