{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1166471,
        "msgid": "top-firms-get-poor-marks-on-environment-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-08-09 00:00:00",
        "title": "Top firms get poor marks on environment",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Top firms get poor marks on environment The Jakarta Post, Jakarta A number of multinational firms including the domestic subsidiaries of oil and gas firms Conocophillips, Caltex, Unocal, Total E&P and pharmaceutical firms Bayer and Pfizer got red labels for poor performance in environmental management, the government announced on Monday.",
        "content": "<p>Top firms get poor marks on environment<\/p>\n<p>The Jakarta Post, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>A number of multinational firms including the domestic<br>\nsubsidiaries of oil and gas firms Conocophillips, Caltex, Unocal,<br>\nTotal E&amp;P and pharmaceutical firms Bayer and Pfizer got red<br>\nlabels for poor performance in environmental management, the<br>\ngovernment announced on Monday.<\/p>\n<p>A 2004-2005 environmental audit conducted on 466 selected<br>\nfirms showed that 150 of them were given the red mark and 72 got<br>\nblack for not doing enough in terms of environmental management.<\/p>\n<p>State Minister of the Environment Rachmat Witoelar said there<br>\nwere 14 firms that got black twice and the government would give<br>\nthem one month to improve.<\/p>\n<p>\"If they failed to improve or show goodwill to, my office will<br>\ntake them to court in civil or criminal suits based on damages<br>\nthey have inflicted on the environment,\" he told The Jakarta<br>\nPost.<\/p>\n<p>The Company Environmental Management Assessment Program<br>\n(PROPER) was first started in 1995 before the government<br>\nsuspended it in 1997, citing economic and political constraints.<br>\nThe program was resumed in 2002.<\/p>\n<p>PROPER has a color-coded system in declining order for<br>\ncompanies -- gold, green, blue, red and black -- with gold<br>\nindicating exemplary environmental performance and black<br>\nsubstandard performance.<\/p>\n<p>However, none of the companies audited this year received a<br>\ngold mark for satisfactory performance.<\/p>\n<p>The assessment is based on at least 50 criteria, including<br>\ncontrol of liquid waste, air pollution and hazardous waste,<br>\nimplementation of environmental impact analysis, management of<br>\nresources and environment and public involvement.<\/p>\n<p>The more criteria a company fulfills, the higher its rating.<\/p>\n<p>The audit, conducted between January 2004 and May 2005,<br>\nrevealed that 23 firms were given the green label and 221 the<br>\nblue label.<\/p>\n<p>Rachmat said the \"red firms\" were deemed not to have brought<br>\nharm to the environment yet, but were poor in environmental<br>\nmanagement.<\/p>\n<p>\"There are no sanctions against firms. But if any investors or<br>\npotential shareholders asked, I will have to mention that,\" he<br>\nsaid, adding that announcing the names of the firms should<br>\nencourage them to work harder on promoting good environmental<br>\nmanagement policies.<\/p>\n<p>According to the minister, his office had maintained close<br>\ncontact with the companies and therefore, most of them would not<br>\nbe surprised by these latest results.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/top-firms-get-poor-marks-on-environment-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}