{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1478886,
        "msgid": "to-dump-or-not-to-dump-jakarta-weighs-its-options-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-01-12 00:00:00",
        "title": "To dump or not to dump?: Jakarta weighs its options",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "To dump or not to dump?: Jakarta weighs its options Damar Harsanto, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta The Jakarta administration has yet to decide whether it will start operating the 104-hectare Bantar Gebang dump again following an offer by Bekasi municipality to allow the capital to resume dumping its 6,000 tons of daily garbage there.",
        "content": "<p>To dump or not to dump?: Jakarta weighs its options<\/p>\n<p>Damar Harsanto, The Jakarta Post, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>The Jakarta administration has yet to decide whether it will <br>\nstart operating the 104-hectare Bantar Gebang dump again <br>\nfollowing an offer by Bekasi municipality to allow the capital to <br>\nresume dumping its 6,000 tons of daily garbage there.<\/p>\n<p>\"For the time being, Governor Sutiyoso has ordered the <br>\nrelevant officials to discuss Bekasi's offer on the use of the <br>\nBantar Gebang dump with Bekasi officials,\" city spokesman Muhayat <br>\nsaid on Saturday.<\/p>\n<p>Assistant to the city secretary for development affairs, IGKG <br>\nSuena, and Jakarta Sanitation Agency head Selamat Limbong were <br>\ntasked to check if Bekasi was really serious about the offer.<\/p>\n<p>\"We simply don't want to be trapped into further uncertainty <br>\nin the future if we hurriedly decide to use the Bantar Gebang <br>\ndump again,\" Muhayat said.<\/p>\n<p>Bekasi Mayor Akhmad Zurfaih sent a letter to Sutiyoso on <br>\nFriday informing him that the mayor and Bekasi councillors had <br>\nagreed to allow Jakarta the dump its garbage in Bantar Gebang <br>\nbased on the joint agreement between the administrations of <br>\nJakarta and Bekasi dated Dec. 22.<\/p>\n<p>Jakarta closed down the dump last week after Bekasi demanded <br>\nthe capital pay a waste processing fee of Rp 85,000 (US$10) for <br>\neach ton of waste.<\/p>\n<p>The closure led to a garbage crisis in the two cities, which <br>\nboth use the dump, that has lasted for more than a week. In the <br>\nmeantime, Jakarta began to dump its waste in swampy, open land in <br>\nCilincing and Rorotan subdistricts, both in North Jakarta.<\/p>\n<p>Playing down the waste crisis in the capital, Muhayat said <br>\nthat the city administration would keep focusing on its plan to <br>\ninvite investors to provide high technology waste management <br>\nfacilities for Jakarta.<\/p>\n<p>\"These investors will build the facilities for us. That's why <br>\nwe are not putting any allocations in the 2004 budget to finance <br>\nthe building of high-tech waste facilities,\" he asserted.<\/p>\n<p>In the budget allocation for sanitation, the sanitation agency <br>\nhas not earmarked any funds for high technology waste management <br>\nfacilities. Instead, it has allocated Rp 25 billion to compensate <br>\nBekasi for the use of Bantar Gebang.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/to-dump-or-not-to-dump-jakarta-weighs-its-options-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}