{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1113948,
        "msgid": "the-world-bank-again-1447893297",
        "date": "2001-04-24 00:00:00",
        "title": "The World Bank -- again",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The World Bank -- again On April 17, 2001 The Jakarta Post carried my letter Babies and corruption in which I said that in canceling the US$300 million poverty alleviation loan, the World Bank had made it clear it had found corruption in the program. I waited to see a letter from the bank's Jakarta office correcting my exaggeration; for in fact their announcement wasn't as unambiguous as that.",
        "content": "<p>The World Bank -- again<\/p>\n<p>On April 17, 2001 The Jakarta Post carried my letter Babies<br>\nand corruption in which I said that in canceling the US$300<br>\nmillion poverty alleviation loan, the World Bank had made it<br>\nclear it had found corruption in the program. I waited to see a<br>\nletter from the bank's Jakarta office correcting my exaggeration;<br>\nfor in fact their announcement wasn't as unambiguous as that.<br>\nWe've all assumed that the bank's language in announcing the<br>\ncancellation was a polite way of pointing to corruption within<br>\nthe program, and the bank has not taken any steps to correct this<br>\npublic perception.<\/p>\n<p>The loan cancellation is a tacit acknowledgement that the bank<br>\nis still after all these years either unable to figure out how to<br>\ncontrol gross corruption from within its projects, or unwilling<br>\nto do what's needed. What was missing from the bank's<br>\nannouncement of the loan cancellation was any mention of what it<br>\nplanned to do about the malfeasance it discovered. (And if it did<br>\nnot discover malfeasance, why did it cancel such a vital<br>\nprogram?)<\/p>\n<p>Has it turned evidence over to someone to be investigated?<br>\nOr blacklisted responsible program managers from eligibility for<br>\nfuture employment for their poor management (if not outright<br>\ncorruption)? Or announced its findings to the public as a<br>\nlearning instrument? As usual the bank is silent -- the silence<br>\nof dubious diplomacy or mistaken cultural sensitivity. If the<br>\nbank has found wrongdoing, doesn't it have an obligation to try<br>\nto recover the money or materials that were lost to corruption?<br>\nIf it does not do so, in justice it cannot expect Indonesia to<br>\nrepay the $300 million.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, it is the World Bank that stands accused, again,<br>\nof negligent oversight and instruction of program managers. This<br>\nnegligence is costing Indonesia dearly, in money and lost<br>\nopportunities. When and how will it end? Will the World Bank<br>\nplease tell us clearly, and without platitudes and mumbo jumbo,<br>\nvia an article in this paper, specifically what you plan to do?<br>\nOr as an alternative, correct any misperceptions and<br>\nmisstatements in this letter. But please, be transparent and<br>\naccountable to the people of Indonesia and of those other<br>\ncountries whose taxpayers' pay your high salaries.<\/p>\n<p>DONNA K. WOODWARD<\/p>\n<p>Medan, North Sumatra<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-world-bank-again-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}