{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1036275,
        "msgid": "the-supreme-court-puzzle-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-06-13 00:00:00",
        "title": "The Supreme Court puzzle",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The Supreme Court puzzle The puzzle at the Supreme Court has finally been answered. Supreme Court chairman Soerjono, after a meeting with President Soeharto Monday explained that no proof of collusion was found in the highest judicial institution. According to Soerjono, the rumor of a Rp.",
        "content": "<p>The Supreme Court puzzle<\/p>\n<p>The puzzle at the Supreme Court has finally been answered.<br>\nSupreme Court chairman Soerjono, after a meeting with President<br>\nSoeharto Monday explained that no proof of collusion was found in<br>\nthe highest judicial institution. According to Soerjono, the<br>\nrumor of a Rp. 1.4 billion bribe  -- which was initially raised<br>\nby the Supreme Court's deputy chairman for cases of general<br>\ncriminal law, Adi Andojo Soetjipto, and taken up by the printed<br>\nand electronic media -- originated from an unverified anonymous<br>\nletter.<\/p>\n<p>The conclusion, based on investigations conducted by the<br>\ncoordinator of special control, appears to answer all the riddles<br>\nplaguing this elevated judicial institution. As it turns out,<br>\nhowever, the answers have created new riddles. The conclusion<br>\ndoes not question what was wrong with Adi, the Supreme Court<br>\njustice who was unwavering in exposing the misbehavior among his<br>\ncolleagues and who was then barred from speaking to the press?<\/p>\n<p>Either Adi is being victimized or he is indeed guilty. By his<br>\nadmission he is greatly disappointed with the result of the<br>\ninvestigation. According to Adi, clear and transparent proof of<br>\ncollusion is easily found. The finding of innocence in the<br>\nSupreme Court could encourage further collusion among judges and<br>\noutsiders. Some observers fear that the finding is not objective.<br>\nThe problem is that the investigation was conducted by an agency<br>\nof the Supreme Court itself. An independent investigation might<br>\nhave come up with a more neutral finding.<\/p>\n<p>The public sees many cases in which the Supreme Court appears<br>\nunhealthy. The critical capabilities of individuals like Adi<br>\nshould not be destroyed by this finding, which was endorsed by<br>\nthe Supreme Court's chairman. We hope people will not become<br>\nafraid to speak the truth because of this conclusion.<\/p>\n<p>-- Media Indonesia, Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-supreme-court-puzzle-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}