{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1411672,
        "msgid": "the-new-banknote-1447893297",
        "date": "1999-11-10 00:00:00",
        "title": "The new banknote",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The new banknote A letter in The Jakarta Post on Nov. 8, 1999 raised the question of why the year '05 was mentioned instead of '45 on the new Rp 100,000 bill in reference to the Proclamation of Independence. During the Japanese occupation, Indonesia used the Japanese calender, not the Judeo-Christian calender year. The year 1945 in the Christian calender is 2605 in the Japanese calender.",
        "content": "<p>The new banknote<\/p>\n<p>A letter in The Jakarta Post on Nov. 8, 1999 raised the<br>\nquestion of why the year &apos;05 was mentioned instead of &apos;45 on the<br>\nnew Rp 100,000 bill in reference to the Proclamation of<br>\nIndependence.<\/p>\n<p>During the Japanese occupation, Indonesia used the Japanese<br>\ncalender, not the Judeo-Christian calender year. The year 1945 in<br>\nthe Christian calender is 2605 in the Japanese calender. In the<br>\nProclamation of Independence, like in nearly all Indonesian<br>\ndocuments of the time, the Japanese calender year was used<br>\ninstead of the Christian calender year. Thus, it is neither a<br>\ncode nor a mistake on the part of Bank Indonesia, just good<br>\nhistorical representation.<\/p>\n<p>MAYUMI YAMAMOTO<\/p>\n<p>Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-new-banknote-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}