{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1036392,
        "msgid": "the-musyawarah-spirit-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-06-28 00:00:00",
        "title": "The 'musyawarah' spirit",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The 'musyawarah' spirit Whatever happened to the spirit of musyawarah? This question about an age-old Indonesian tradition of settling differences through deliberations was asked by Minister of Defense and Security Edi Sudradjat during a hearing with the House of Representatives on Wednesday. As reported in this newspaper yesterday, the retired Army general complained during the hearing reviewing the security situation with the House's Commission I about the fading spirit of musyawarah.",
        "content": "<p>The 'musyawarah' spirit<\/p>\n<p>Whatever happened to the spirit of musyawarah? This question<br>\nabout an age-old Indonesian tradition of settling differences<br>\nthrough deliberations was asked by Minister of Defense and<br>\nSecurity Edi Sudradjat during a hearing with the House of<br>\nRepresentatives on Wednesday. As reported in this newspaper<br>\nyesterday, the retired Army general complained during the hearing<br>\nreviewing the security situation with the House's Commission I<br>\nabout the fading spirit of musyawarah. The concern was widely<br>\nshared by many members of the commission. Gen. Edi reflected that<br>\nmusyawarah is what keeps people together in a group, organization<br>\nor community. It acts like a glue.<\/p>\n<p>Nobody can deny that musyawarah is preferred over other<br>\nalternatives in resolving differences; certainly over the use of<br>\nvoting, or worse still, the use of force and violence. Our<br>\nfounding fathers recognized the virtues of this principle when<br>\nthey inserted musyawarah untuk mencapai mufakat (deliberation to<br>\nreach consensus) as the fourth of the five principles in the<br>\nstate ideology Pancasila. In a country as diverse in terms of<br>\ncultural, ethnical, racial and religious backgrounds as ours,<br>\nmusyawarah becomes the cornerstone of our democracy.<\/p>\n<p>It is through musyawarah that opposing parties work out their<br>\ndifferences. The act of deliberation is an expression of goodwill<br>\non the part of the conflicting parties to work towards a<br>\nsolution. Musyawarah is a give-and-take process in order to come<br>\nto an arrangement agreeable to all parties. There are no<br>\ndifferences, however sharp they may be, that cannot be resolved<br>\nthrough musyawarah, as long as all parties show goodwill, so the<br>\nproponents of the concept argue.<\/p>\n<p>Gen. Edi made no reference to any particular case when he<br>\nraised his concern on Wednesday. But he did say that the current<br>\nbickering in many organizations stems from the members' inability<br>\nto resolve differences through deliberations.<\/p>\n<p>We could not help but link his statement to the conflict in<br>\nthe Indonesian Democratic Party (PDI), if only because the calls<br>\nfor musyawarah by senior government officials over the past two<br>\nweeks have been directed at the bickering leaders of this<br>\nminority party.<\/p>\n<p>It is apparent that both camps in the conflict have neglected<br>\nthe musyawarah principle. We recall that just as the breakaway<br>\nPDI members were preparing to hold their congress to oust<br>\nMegawati Soekarnoputri from the leadership last week, a number of<br>\nsenior statesmen were making eleventh-hour appeals for them to<br>\npursue the musyawarah course. They ignored the appeal and went<br>\nahead with the congress, with support from the Ministry of Home<br>\nAffairs and the Armed Forces.<\/p>\n<p>Now that the PDI rebels have elected Soerjadi to lead the<br>\nparty and the government and the military have given their<br>\nrecognition in preference over Megawati, the chorus for<br>\nmusyawarah from government officials was renewed. This time,<br>\nMegawati and her supporters ignored the appeal and announced<br>\ntheir intention to sue the government and the Soerjadi camp.<\/p>\n<p>At this late stage of the PDI conflict, the question to ask is<br>\nnot about what has happened to musyawarah, but rather whether<br>\nmusyawarah had been given a chance to work in the first place.<br>\nThe hasty official support of the congress and recognition of its<br>\nresults clearly indicate that musyawarah was never given a chance<br>\nat all. Now that the damage is done, it would be unreasonable to<br>\nplace the burden to start the process of dialog solely on<br>\nMegawati and Soerjadi when third party interests seem to have<br>\ncontributed to muddling the current conflict.<\/p>\n<p>As stated above, for musyawarah to take place at all, there<br>\nmust be goodwill on behalf of the conflicting parties, and this<br>\nmeans not only the two rival PDI camps, but also those third<br>\nparties who may have had a hand in the conflict. Without this<br>\ngoodwill, musyawarah cannot be expected to work, and the best one<br>\ncould hope for is for an appearance of musyawarah. This will<br>\ncompound rather than solve problems.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-musyawarah-spirit-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}