{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1477165,
        "msgid": "the-kampar-case-differences-between-the-us-and-indonesia-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-03-04 00:00:00",
        "title": "The Kampar case: Differences between the U.S. and Indonesia",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The Kampar case: Differences between the U.S. and Indonesia Ardimas Sasdi, Staff Writer, The Jakarta Post, Berkeley, California, ajambak@calmail.berkeley.edu In a blunder analogous to a asinine comment made by the regent of Kampar, Riau, in response to a question posited by a local teacher about the minute educational budget, U.S. Education Secretary Rod Paige has compared America's largest teachers' union to a terrorist organization.",
        "content": "<p>The Kampar case: Differences between the U.S. and Indonesia<\/p>\n<p>Ardimas Sasdi, Staff Writer, The Jakarta Post, Berkeley, California,<\/p>\n<p>ajambak@calmail.berkeley.edu<\/p>\n<p>In a blunder analogous to a asinine comment made by the regent<br>\nof Kampar, Riau, in response to a question posited by a local<br>\nteacher about the minute educational budget, U.S. Education<br>\nSecretary Rod Paige has compared America&apos;s largest teachers&apos;<br>\nunion to a terrorist organization.<\/p>\n<p>Paige, furious over the refusal of the National Education<br>\nAssociation (NEA) on the No Child Left Behind Act, made the<br>\nremark on the 2.7 million-strong association on Monday at a<br>\ngathering of governors at the White House.<\/p>\n<p>Paige later apologized.<\/p>\n<p>The New York Times, in an editorial on Wednesday, said the<br>\nterrorist comment was the latest of a long list of errors by<br>\nPaige, including a remark last year in which he said he preferred<br>\nto put a child in a Christian school and suggested that<br>\nChristians were morally superior.<\/p>\n<p>NEA president Reg Weaver asked President George W. Bush to<br>\nexpress his regret to the nation&apos;s educators for the slanderous<br>\nremarks made by his aide and demanded that Secretary Paige step<br>\ndown. Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives also<br>\nlambasted Paige and backed the NEA&apos;s demand, asking Congress to<br>\nchange several provisions in the act deemed to weaken public<br>\neducation.<\/p>\n<p>The controversial education law, endorsed by President George<br>\nW. Bush in January 2002, opposed by both Democrat and Republican<br>\ncamps for different reasons, includes regulations to expand<br>\nstandardized testing, to appoint top teachers in all core classes<br>\nand several other reforms.<\/p>\n<p>Without overlooking their differences, the cases of the Kampar<br>\nregent and Secretary Paige bear some similarities: These<br>\nincidents involve education, appointed officials vs. teachers and<br>\npublic anger, on which politicians later capitalized. Both<br>\nofficials defied calls for their resignation, arguing that they<br>\nhad a job to improve education.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, the authorities&apos; response to the cases was also<br>\nsimilar. President Bush&apos;s spokesman Trent Duffy said Paige&apos;s job<br>\nwas safe because the President wanted the secretary to do his<br>\njob, while Minister of Home Affairs Hari Sabarno backed Regent<br>\nJefri Noer&apos;s remaining in office, although a ministerial team is<br>\nto investigate the Kampar case.<\/p>\n<p>In an extraordinary session convened after massive rallies by<br>\nteachers and students protesting the distasteful comments and<br>\nattitude Jefri displayed toward a teacher invited to a public<br>\nmeeting, the Kampar legislative council dismissed the regent last<br>\nweek for the second time in two years. The same council fired<br>\nJefri in 2002 in a motion of no confidence, but the Ministry of<br>\nHome Affairs annulled the legislature&apos;s ruling.<\/p>\n<p>There are, however, at least two major differences in the<br>\nJefri and Paige cases. The differences, within the cultural and<br>\ndemocratic contexts of the respective nations, include the<br>\nattitudes of appointed officials in responding to their errors<br>\nand how the public expressed their opinion and anger.<\/p>\n<p>Jefri admonished a noted teacher for questioning the small<br>\neducational budget in the meeting, then attempted to kick him<br>\nout, arguing that the educator had disrupted the event -- an<br>\ninadequate response to a fair question. Jefri later met the<br>\nteacher to settle the matter informally, a practice common among<br>\npeople of the higher echelon to save face.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesians, upset by their poor national education system<br>\ncompared to neighboring countries like Malaysia and Singapore,<br>\nhave lately become more critical of the government. Still, not a<br>\nsingle one of the country&apos;s 31 provinces has yet allocated 20<br>\npercent of their budgets for education as mandated by the amended<br>\nConstitution, citing financial constraints.<\/p>\n<p>Jefri&apos;s remedy for the dispute differed from that of Paige,<br>\nwho immediately apologized to the NEA through the media for his<br>\ninsensitive comment. Executives lodged protests against Paige,<br>\nbut their protests were limited to a level of discourse, while<br>\nthe NEA did not organize rallies involving its members and<br>\nstudents.<\/p>\n<p>In a striking contrast, the protests in Kampar -- apparently<br>\nexploited by political opponents of Jefri and endorsed by<br>\neducation officials -- lasted three weeks and involved 5,000<br>\nteachers and around 40,000 students from almost all schools in<br>\nthe regency, a spectacular showing of solidarity.<\/p>\n<p>There are at least three lessons to be learned from these two<br>\ncases on opposite sides of the globe. First, appointed and<br>\nelected officials must always remain composed and exercise<br>\ncaution in their comments. They must apologize immediately to the<br>\npublic through the media if errors have been made -- even though<br>\nthis option may be embarrassing in Indonesian culture -- and not<br>\nsettle the matter through an informal channel.<\/p>\n<p>Second, Indonesians may need to stop cursing themselves for<br>\nincidents in the country, as if they augur ill and foreshadow a<br>\nnearing doomsday, and see such incidents in a positive light<br>\nwhile looking for an alternative solution. Paige&apos;s case shows<br>\nthat similar blunders happen in other parts of the world,<br>\nincluding in a developed democracy like America.<\/p>\n<p>Third, teachers, as educated citizens, must think<br>\nintelligently and act in a measured manner, bearing in mind that<br>\nthey serve as role models in society. The deployment of a large<br>\nnumber people in rallies was not only risky in view of possible<br>\nmishaps, but also not conducive to democratic education for the<br>\nyounger generation.<\/p>\n<p>In any democracy, schools have a dual task -- to arm the young<br>\nwith the knowledge and skills needed for future employment and to<br>\nplay a constructive role in democracy. But schools can also<br>\nbecome a breeding ground for intolerance and extremism. The<br>\nKampar case should be the last of its kind and serve as a lesson<br>\nin democracy for us all.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a visiting scholar at the Graduate School of<br>\nJournalism, the University of California at Berkeley.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-kampar-case-differences-between-the-us-and-indonesia-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}