{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1105730,
        "msgid": "the-good-bad-and-ugly-sides-of-soes-1447893297",
        "date": "2001-05-01 00:00:00",
        "title": "The good, bad and ugly sides of SOEs",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The good, bad and ugly sides of SOEs The following is the second of two articles on state-owned enterprises by Sauri Hasibuan, assistant manager at Ernst & Young Consulting Corporate Finance Division, Jakarta JAKARTA (JP): Bankrupting those state-owned enterprises (SOEs) suspected of improper accounting practices is hardly a solution, for that would mean most of them. So the government is trying to separate them into three groups: The hopeless, the bad and the prospective.",
        "content": "<p>The good, bad and ugly sides of SOEs<\/p>\n<p>The following is the second of two articles on state-owned<br>\nenterprises by Sauri Hasibuan, assistant manager at Ernst &amp; Young<br>\nConsulting Corporate Finance Division, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Bankrupting those state-owned enterprises (SOEs)<br>\nsuspected of improper accounting practices is hardly a solution,<br>\nfor that would mean most of them. So the government is trying to<br>\nseparate them into three groups: The hopeless, the bad and the<br>\nprospective.<\/p>\n<p>A realistic estimate, one senior consultant suggests, is that<br>\nhalf will fall into the first group, 40 percent into the second,<br>\nand only 10 percent into the third. The fate of the duds should<br>\nbe managed to ensure a gradual exit from the market.<\/p>\n<p>As a first step, their bad debts are being transferred to the<br>\nIndonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA) through its asset-<br>\nmanagement units, although it is not clear what these units will<br>\nthen do with them.<\/p>\n<p>Those in the second group are being prepared for sale to<br>\nforeign or domestic private investors. Those in the third group<br>\nare possibly being listed on the stock market. Out of 167 SOEs,<br>\n71 are on the list of IBRA's restructuring program.<\/p>\n<p>The process is painfully slow. SOE debts that must be<br>\nrestructured total Rp 18 trillion. A centerpiece of the<br>\npreparations for sale is forced consolidation.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia has one behemoth, the PLN electricity firm. Its<br>\ndebts would eventually be returned to Bank BRI, as PLN's original<br>\nlenders, which in turn would have to report to Bank Mandiri which<br>\nhas since taken over Bank BRI's lending facilities under which<br>\nthe PLN terms would have been agreed.<\/p>\n<p>The arrangements are complex since PLN also has disputes with<br>\na multitude of foreign creditors. There is also talk on merging<br>\ntelecommunications firms Indosat and Telkom, plans on fusing all<br>\ncompanies under the Strategic Industries Supervisory Agency into<br>\none, several regional banks into one, and so on.<\/p>\n<p>In some cases, these mergers will help, especially when they<br>\nare, in effect, takeovers of weaker management by the stronger.<br>\nSometimes they have also helped cut oversupply.<br>\nMeanwhile, the energetic president director of PT Telkom, Cacuk<br>\nSudarijanto, was forced to resign despite the fact that the<br>\ncompany's performance had improved under his stewardship.<\/p>\n<p>But Telkom was fortunate that it had already entered<br>\ninternational capital markets as its shares had been publicly<br>\nlisted since 1995. PLN is a different case though: is the company<br>\nable to cut its workforce?<\/p>\n<p>It has to look further into its revenue and expenditure. If<br>\nthe two components are on a par then you have an answer. Reducing<br>\nexpenditure seems a bit difficult since there has been a raise in<br>\nemployees' salaries. One solution is increasing the tariff<br>\nthrough the consumer segmentation and differentiation.<\/p>\n<p>But in many other cases, the mergers and privatization will<br>\nonly create mediocrity on a larger scale. Moreover, the<br>\ngovernment has not yet resolved a basic dilemma: if it sells the<br>\nenterprise before it is restructured, it will only be able to do<br>\nso at a pittance. The government needs cash to pay off<br>\nliabilities at other enterprises too.<\/p>\n<p>Yet the alternative, which is to restructure the enterprises<br>\nin the hope of selling them for more, will be tricky. \"Government<br>\ncannot restructure itself,\" is the blunt assessment of one local<br>\ninvestment banker.<\/p>\n<p>One school believes that government should give more autonomy<br>\nto its enterprises and managers in the hope that this will lead<br>\nto more transparency and cleaner accounting.<\/p>\n<p>A prominent economist states that privatization, which is a<br>\ntransfer of property rights, is not only meaningless but also<br>\npositively counter-productive in a country that has not yet<br>\nadequately defined these rights.<\/p>\n<p>Without regulatory regimes and strict accounting standards,<br>\nprivatization could simply offer incentives for corruption.<br>\nAnother option is to disable an essential prerequisite for<br>\nmismanagement, which is the SOEs' access to \"soft\" budgets.<\/p>\n<p>Managers could not run their businesses against the law of<br>\neconomics, and officials could not pilfer from them indefinitely,<br>\nif their source of cheap bank credits were removed. If the banks<br>\nwere capable of selecting borrowers and charging interest rates<br>\naccording to the perceived risk, the SOEs would soon learn to<br>\ninvest rationally and to run their operations for cash and not<br>\npaper profits. And by putting teeth into the bankruptcy law so<br>\nthat insolvent firms were actually forced into liquidation,<br>\nmismanagement would at last have a downside.<\/p>\n<p>The most concrete impact that will be felt by Indonesia's SOEs<br>\nwith the arrival of the ASEAN Free Trade Area is the introduction<br>\nof foreign competition and more stringent credit assessment by<br>\nIndonesia's banking system.<\/p>\n<p>Even so, change will be both dangerous and hard. A string of<br>\nsudden bankruptcies would strain Indonesia's public finances.<br>\nUnless and until Indonesia implements good corporate governance<br>\nwithin all companies it will be of no relevance to plan the<br>\nprivatization of companies.<\/p>\n<p>Telkom shares as well as those of Indosat have now become blue<br>\nchip shares. Though if Telkom, which holds a telecommunications<br>\nmonopoly, had not been privatized, it is extremely likely that it<br>\nwould have suffered a similar fate to Garuda, which had assets<br>\ndismantled and illegally sold because it lacked transparent<br>\naccountability and good corporate governance.<\/p>\n<p>On a larger scale, further delays in implementing good<br>\ncorporate governance may prove a catastrophic mistake. Worker<br>\nunrest has been growing: the government is becoming fragile,<br>\nespecially if the economy turns down.<\/p>\n<p>It would be better to be bolder now and fix the SOEs while the<br>\ncountry needs their contribution the most.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-good-bad-and-ugly-sides-of-soes-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}