{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1385337,
        "msgid": "the-currency-board-system-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-02-14 00:00:00",
        "title": "The currency board system",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The currency board system President Soeharto's fast, bold move on a fixed exchange rate system under currency board arrangements, to arrest the wild volatility and downward spiral of the rupiah, is founded strongly on both economic and political rationale. Without a stable currency, nothing else will stabilize and improve the economy.",
        "content": "<p>The currency board system<\/p>\n<p>President Soeharto&apos;s fast, bold move on a fixed exchange rate<br>\nsystem under currency board arrangements, to arrest the wild<br>\nvolatility and downward spiral of the rupiah, is founded strongly<br>\non both economic and political rationale.<\/p>\n<p>Without a stable currency, nothing else will stabilize and<br>\nimprove the economy. Instead, a shattered rupiah will drive most<br>\ncompanies into bankruptcy, increasing the unemployment ranks to<br>\nan explosive level, raising prices beyond the purchasing power of<br>\nthe people and triggering social and political instability.<\/p>\n<p>A fixed exchange rate, if the experiences of other countries<br>\nsuch as Argentina, Hong Kong, Brunei, Bosnia, Estonia and<br>\nLithuania are any guidance, could quickly solve almost all the<br>\nproblems caused by a wildly fluctuating currency.<\/p>\n<p>A currency board system (CBS) creates a stable exchange rate<br>\nbecause every unit of local currency is backed by the equivalent<br>\nin the chosen anchor currency. Any increase in the domestic<br>\ncurrency in circulation should be matched with foreign reserves.<\/p>\n<p>However, whether a CBS is the best way for Indonesia to get<br>\nout of the present crisis is still highly debatable, given the<br>\nwide differences between our circumstances and the countries<br>\nwhich have successfully implemented the system.<\/p>\n<p>Not many technical details were immediately available as to<br>\nhow the government would organize and structure its CBS for the<br>\nrupiah. But, given the short time available to prepare all the<br>\nlegal and technical frameworks, we reckon that the CBS would<br>\nlikely be established as a division within the central bank (Bank<br>\nIndonesia).<\/p>\n<p>Setting up a separate monetary institution outside Bank<br>\nIndonesia would require amendments to the Central Bank Law, a<br>\nprocess that may take a few weeks even though the House of<br>\nRepresentatives is dominated by the ruling Golkar organization.<\/p>\n<p>The consequence of the introduction of CBS is that the<br>\ngovernment will have to surrender virtually all its monetary<br>\npolicy autonomy.<\/p>\n<p>The government would no longer be free to set interest rates<br>\nand inject liquidity into the economy at will. Asset markets,<br>\noutput, employment and other economic aggregates must adjust to<br>\nwhatever levels are required to maintain the specified exchange<br>\nrate. If companies or banks go bankrupt they can not be bailed<br>\nout.<\/p>\n<p>Given the rigid market discipline CBS requires, the biggest<br>\nquestion -- or rather the greatest doubt -- is whether such a<br>\nsystem could be credible and sustainable for a long time under a<br>\npolitical leadership, notoriously known for its high<br>\nvulnerability to cronyism, nepotism and corruption.<\/p>\n<p>The advocates of CBS see this fixed-rate system as the<br>\nquickest way of getting out of the currency turmoil, arguing that<br>\nthe country&apos;s official foreign reserves are more than enough to<br>\nback up such a system.<\/p>\n<p>Critics and skeptics, however, argue that while the US$17<br>\nbillion in official foreign reserves might be adequate to support<br>\nCBS -- depending on which level the rate would be fixed and which<br>\nmoney category would be covered -- two key fundamentals for a CBS<br>\nsuccess do not yet exist in the country: a sound banking system<br>\nand strong public confidence in the political leadership&apos;s<br>\ncapability and willingness to consistently take painful reform<br>\nmeasures to cope with the economic crisis.<\/p>\n<p>CBS is only as good as the intentions of the people who create<br>\nand operate it. Doubts about the motives behind introducing CBS<br>\nwould remain until the government is seen to act firmly on its<br>\nprevious commitments. The people should be convinced that the<br>\ngovernment does not fiddle with the system.<\/p>\n<p>The question is how the government could convince the people<br>\nthat CBS would really be free from political interference, unlike<br>\nthe central bank, which has so far been highly vulnerable to<br>\npolitical intervention and politically well-connected vested<br>\ninterests.<\/p>\n<p>Confidence is a precious commodity. Once lost, it is difficult<br>\nto regain.<\/p>\n<p>The value of the currency and financial intermediation process<br>\nin particular are built on confidence, the trust that deposits<br>\nare safe, bonds are redeemable, contracts are binding and<br>\nenforceable.<\/p>\n<p>Take this vital pillar away, and the entire structure<br>\ncollapses with devastating consequences for the economy.<\/p>\n<p>If the people do not fully believe in CBS there might be a<br>\nmassive scramble for dollars to cash out of rupiah as quickly as<br>\npossible. This would worsen the credit crunch, leading more<br>\ncompanies into bankruptcy, as rupiah interest rates would<br>\nskyrocket to several hundred percent.<\/p>\n<p>In anticipation of such a scramble for dollars the CBS should<br>\nbe backed up by reserves equivalent to the broad money supply<br>\n(estimated at Rp 378 trillion) to make it credible. Obviously,<br>\nour foreign reserves would not be sufficient to support it.<\/p>\n<p>IMF endorsement is also vital for gaining the international<br>\nmarket confidence in CBS but as IMF First Managing Director<br>\nStanley Fischer stated in Washington on Thursday, CBS was not<br>\nviable for Indonesia at this juncture in time.<\/p>\n<p>The government is faced with extremely difficult choices. It<br>\ncould accelerate the process of stabilizing the rupiah by acting<br>\nmore firmly and speedily on the IMF-arranged reforms and<br>\nstrengthen this effort with equally bold political reforms to<br>\nregain confidence.<\/p>\n<p>Or the government could push ahead with its plan on CBS at<br>\ngreat risks because the new system will not only require<br>\nwholesale renegotiation of the IMF rescue package of Jan. 15 but<br>\nalso may delay the next disbursement of the second $3 billion<br>\nfund from IMF, scheduled in the middle of next month.<\/p>\n<p>But the sheer renegotiation of the Jan. 15 package, after the<br>\nbad image and low credibility already incurred by the<br>\ngovernment&apos;s backtracking on the Nov. 1 package, would not help<br>\nthe process of confidence building.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-currency-board-system-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}