{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 17789,
        "msgid": "the-abc-of-indonesian-infrastructure-financing",
        "date": "2015-10-04 00:00:00",
        "title": "The ABC of Indonesian infrastructure financing",
        "author": "Jackie Horne",
        "source": "Finance Asia",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Indonesia wants to lift itself to middle income status. To do so, the Ministry of National Development & Planning, Bappenas, has estimated the country needs Rp5.5 quadrillion ($385 billion) in infrastructure development between 2015 and 2019. But there is also a more pressing need to sort out the country\u2019s transportation bottlenecks, which add to the cost of doing business.",
        "content": "<p>Indonesia wants to lift itself to middle income status. To do so, the Ministry of National Development &amp; Planning, Bappenas, has estimated the country needs<br>\nRp5.5 quadrillion ($385 billion) in infrastructure development between 2015 and 2019.<\/p>\n<p>But there is also a more pressing need to sort out the country\u2019s transportation bottlenecks, which add to the cost of doing business. The country has roughly<br>\n2.5 million young people entering the workforce each year and it needs to keep growing at an estimated 7% per annum to provide them with jobs.<\/p>\n<p>Edward Gustely has been working at the sharp end of infrastructure finance in Indonesia for more than 20 years.<\/p>\n<p>The co-founder of Jakarta-based Penida Capital helped set up Indonesia\u2019s sovereign wealth fund and the government-owned Indonesia Infrastructure Guarantee Fund<br>\n(IIGF), which provides credit guarantees that help bridge the gap between a project\u2019s greenfield stage and the time it begins to generate cash flows.<\/p>\n<p>Here Gustely explains the role the private sector is playing to bridge a second gap between the state\u2019s ambitions and its budgetary constraints.<\/p>\n<p>In its 2016 budget, the government has provisionally allocated Rp313.5 trillion ($22 billion) for infrastructure spending. How much is going to need to come<br>\nfrom the private sector?<\/p>\n<p>The government hopes the private sector can finance about two thirds of Indonesia\u2019s infrastructure needs. There\u2019s about $93 trillion in investment funds<br>\nglobally out there. So one key question is how you effectively tap into that.<\/p>\n<p>But the most important issue is how Indonesia can get projects to the stage where they\u2019re investment ready in the first place. Fixed income investors need an<br>\nannuity stream. The real challenge is putting a formula in place that ticks of all of an investor\u2019s boxes. The bottleneck has always been project preparation.<\/p>\n<p>There are some very encouraging signs. I\u2019ve just got back from Makassar, a city of two million people in South Sulawesi. It\u2019s really the gateway to eastern<br>\nIndonesia.<\/p>\n<p>There\u2019s always a lot of focus on Greater Jakarta but the provinces are where the real growth is. Makassar is growing by 9% per annum.<\/p>\n<p>I was really blown away by what\u2019s happening there. The city even has its own smart card, which enables the local residents to pay for public transport, property<br>\ntaxes and other government services. If Indonesia can generate that sort of traction and enthusiasm in other provinces then the country will really start to go<br>\nplaces.<\/p>\n<p>So how have they achieved this in Makassar?<\/p>\n<p>Well for starters there is a very dynamic mayor and governor who realize co-ordination is the key to getting infrastructure projects off the ground.<br>\nrelated<\/p>\n<p>They\u2019ve set up a public private partnership (PPP) investment centre, which the mayor has asked us to spearhead. Indonesia could do with more of these at key<br>\ngateways across the archipelago.<\/p>\n<p>The centre will provide technical expertise in how to structure priority infrastructure projects to a stage where they can be financed, ensure there\u2019s<br>\nco-ordination between all the related parties and identity potential problems with execution and delivery. It will be looking at about $2.5 billion worth of<br>\nprojects initially that include light-rail transport, seaport expansion, toll-roads, expanded internet connectivity, hospitals, and atmospheric water generation.<\/p>\n<p>Are all these projects going to be economically viable?<\/p>\n<p>I think projects generally fall into one of three equal camps. About one third will be financially viable and they are the ones, which will have private sector<br>\nfinancial investment. For example seaport expansion, internet connectivity, atmospheric water generation that produces drinking water, and hospitals.<\/p>\n<p>Then there is a second group, which are economically viable but not financially viable. By that I mean they will generate tax revenues and enhance property<br>\nvaluations to the benefit of society. These projects will be the ones that attract bilateral and multilateral funding to bridge the viability gap, and may<br>\ninclude projects such as public-transport, plastic waste to oil recycling facilities, and bulk-water distribution.<\/p>\n<p>Then there are the final third, which will need to be completely funded by the Indonesian government that include underserviced remote areas.<\/p>\n<p>What role can the IIGF play? Has it done enough since it was set up five years ago? It hasn\u2019t really provided many guarantees yet has it?<\/p>\n<p>IIGF was established as the \u201csingle window\u201d to provide guarantees that would mitigate the private sector\u2019s exposure to any risk of government action or inaction<br>\ninvolving specific PPP contracts. But a lack of investment-ready PPP projects eligible for guarantees means that IIGF has had to spend a lot of time training-up<br>\ngovernment agencies responsible for preparing these projects.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re hopeful IIG\u2019s efforts will begin to result in greater use of its guarantee facility.<\/p>\n<p>As an outsider it seems to me Indonesia\u2019s main issue relates to the judicial process.  You\u2019ve been in Indonesia a long time and saw what happened during the<br>\nAsian financial crisis when many borrowers defaulted on their US dollar-denominated debt and refused to pay their creditors back. Have there been any positive<br>\nchanges, which should give investors more confidence?<\/p>\n<p>If you look at a graph and see how Indonesia has moved from the bottom left towards the top right then there has been continual progress on that front over the<br>\npast 20 years. Clearly it has not always been a smooth progression and good times often breed bad policies.<\/p>\n<p>But I think it\u2019s very clear that Indonesia wants to create legal certainty over the sanctity of contracts and their enforceability. Don&apos;t forget Indonesian<br>\ncorporates are equally impacted by any real or perceived rulings that are interpreted as odd by the international media because it causes their risk premiums to<br>\nrise.<\/p>\n<p>The US has funded judicial reform through training and capacity building of Indonesia\u2019s commercial courts though a bi-lateral programme. That finished a few<br>\nyears ago, but is being re-started given the slow progress on judicial reforms it initiated.<\/p>\n<p>But having said that, I think we are seeing less maneuvering these days and faster correction towards accommodating investors. That\u2019s partly a function of<br>\nglobal competition. There are a lot of countries trying to boost their infrastructure. Half of Indonesia\u2019s population is below 30-years old so there really is<br>\nvery little latitude for making mistakes.<\/p>\n<p>There were some expected hiccups in the run up to the last Presidential election, such as quite spirited nationalistic campaigns among competing candidates that<br>\nsent mixed signals to investors. But the new president has a very strong view that Indonesia must get it right. I think recent events at the country\u2019s largest<br>\nsingle infrastructure project demonstrate that.<\/p>\n<p>The $4 billion Central Java project was launched four years ago, with involvement from Japan\u2019s J-Power and Itochu Corp, and IIGF\u2019s guarantee. The new government<br>\nhas clearly shown how serious it is about making sure this project actually happens and sending a signal of intent right across the country.<\/p>\n<p>President Jokowi himself attended the groundbreaking ceremony last month and the issues relating to land acquisition have been addressed.<\/p>\n<p>Have they though? I thought there were quite a few farmers who were still refusing to sell up.<\/p>\n<p>I think there\u2019s roughly 10% of the required land, which is still under negotiation. But that\u2019s fairly typical for any country. You will always get middlemen or<br>\nbrokers involved in holding-up and holding out to the last minute to get the best price. But the Government is confident this will all be done and dusted in the<br>\nnext couple of months now.<\/p>\n<p>It is true that land is a very sensitive issue in a country where there are a lot of people per square kilometre particularly on Java. But there are eminent<br>\ndomain laws here, which allow the government to requisition land.<\/p>\n<p>The government is required by law to pay market value of land acquired for public infrastructure projects. And it has set up courts whose sole purpose is to<br>\nsettle land grievances pertaining to infrastructure development so civil society does not think the government is abusing its powers.<\/p>\n<p>What\u2019s your view on China\u2019s involvement in Indonesia? How big a role could the country play?<\/p>\n<p>Very big. It was recently reported that two major Chinese banks are going to funnel money through Indonesia\u2019s state-owned banks. I believe it\u2019s about $20<br>\nbillion in total. It\u2019s a very clever approach because BNI, Mandiri, BRI etc have the channels to do the necessary credit-risk analysis and due diligence to<br>\nensure sure the money is spent appropriately.<\/p>\n<p>China often attracts criticism for bringing over its own construction workers rather than employing locals. Has that been a problem in Indonesia too?<\/p>\n<p>I think there\u2019s been an evolution on both sides of the negotiating table. Five years ago, for example, there were a lot of Chinese labourers working on the<br>\nChinese-funded suspension bridge from Surabaya to Madura.<\/p>\n<p>These days the host has gotten a little wiser and part of the contract negotiations will involve a stipulation about local labour. But likewise, the Chinese<br>\nwill be making sure their SOEs are looked after too.<\/p>\n<p>So you\u2019re basically quite positive that Indonesia will be able to raise all the money it wants to fund its infrastructure ambitions?<\/p>\n<p>Well I would say things are moving in the right direction. Could they move faster? Yes. But I think it\u2019s very important people remember this country of 253<br>\nmillion people is not homogenous but heterogeneous and spread over an archipelago of 14,000 islands stretching the distance of New York to LA.\u201d<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-abc-of-indonesian-infrastructure-financing",
        "image": "support-infrastructure.jpg"
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}