{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1493805,
        "msgid": "the-1969-papua-referendum-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-08-03 00:00:00",
        "title": "The 1969 Papua referendum",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "The 1969 Papua referendum Reading your editorial titled Spotlight on Papua (The Jakarta Post, July 16, in response to the recent publication of declassified U.S. documents by a private Washington-based research group, which raises questions about Indonesia's takeover of the disputed territory 35 years ago, I find it necessary to make some comments.",
        "content": "<p>The 1969 Papua referendum<\/p>\n<p>Reading your editorial titled Spotlight on Papua (The Jakarta<br>\nPost, July 16, in response to the recent publication of<br>\ndeclassified U.S. documents by a private Washington-based<br>\nresearch group, which raises questions about Indonesia's takeover<br>\nof the disputed territory 35 years ago, I find it necessary to<br>\nmake some comments.<\/p>\n<p>Quoting the sixth and seventh paragraphs, it said: \"It should<br>\nbe remembered that when Indonesia gained its independence in<br>\n1945, the country comprised more than 400 ethnic groups,<br>\nencompassing Stone Age to modern civilization. Indonesian leaders<br>\nbelieved that the most efficient way to hold the referendum was<br>\nthrough tribal chiefs. Even today the vast and rugged province,<br>\nwhich is 10 times the size of the Netherlands, is still acutely<br>\nunderdeveloped. When the referendum was held some Papuan tribes<br>\nstill lived in Stone Age societies. Language was a big barrier as<br>\nIndonesian was new in the province and the tribes' dialects were<br>\nalien to Indonesian officials.\"<\/p>\n<p>An argument to justify your claim above is that, due to the<br>\nrugged geographical location and illiteracy of the Papuans at<br>\nthat time, 1,025 hand-picked Papuans who voted in favor of<br>\nintegration with Indonesia through an \"Indonesian-style<br>\nreferendum,\" known as musyawarah (consultation or deliberation)<br>\nin 1969, would be the best method, instead of exercising a one-<br>\nman, one-vote plebiscite as guaranteed in article 18 of the New<br>\nYork Agreement.<\/p>\n<p>The agreement reads, \"All adult Papuans have the right to<br>\nparticipate in an act of self-determination, to be carried out in<br>\naccordance with international practice\".<\/p>\n<p>Honestly and truthfully, I'd like to underline the point that<br>\nyour claim above is definitely baseless, misleading and untrue.<br>\nWhy? As you know, in 1971, all eligible Papuan voters (not just<br>\nappointed representatives) had, from all walks of life -- Stone-<br>\nAge tribesmen to semi-modern society -- proven themselves to<br>\nsuccessfully participate in Indonesian general elections, two<br>\nyears after Dutch New Guinea was incorporated into the Republic<br>\nof Indonesia through the 1969 plebiscite. The facts, however,<br>\nshowed that the backwardness, underdevelopment and high levels of<br>\nilliteracy before and after two years of integration remained the<br>\nsame.<\/p>\n<p>Also, the language barrier, as you claimed above, did not, in<br>\nreality, turn out to be a large obstacle. After receiving some<br>\nbriefing on methods and polling procedures from appointed<br>\nbilingual officials, the entire process was successful.<\/p>\n<p>JOHN FATIE<br>\nTembagapura, Papua<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/the-1969-papua-referendum-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}