{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1255517,
        "msgid": "speed-the-sales-of-assets-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-05-24 00:00:00",
        "title": "Speed the sales of assets",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Speed the sales of assets Christopher Lingle, Global Strategist, eConoLytics.com, CLINGLE@eConoLytics.com Indonesia has made painfully slow progress in its structural reform and its timetables agreed to with international lenders and donors have constantly been renegotiated or violated. A combination of high indebtedness and dubious corporate and political governance are harming the economy's future growth potential.",
        "content": "<p>Speed the sales of assets<\/p>\n<p>Christopher Lingle, Global Strategist, eConoLytics.com,<br>\nCLINGLE@eConoLytics.com<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia has made painfully slow progress in its structural<br>\nreform and its timetables agreed to with international lenders<br>\nand donors have constantly been renegotiated or violated. A<br>\ncombination of high indebtedness and dubious corporate and<br>\npolitical governance are harming the economy's future growth<br>\npotential.<\/p>\n<p>A poor credit rating prevails that causes companies and the<br>\ngovernment to pay higher interest rates on borrowing. On top of<br>\nthat, there is an\"Indonesia discount\" whereby stock prices of<br>\ndomestic companies are low compared to their peers in other<br>\nmarkets because of a lack of corporate transparency and<br>\naccountability. And this will prevail until there is more<br>\nreform of the financial sector and debts of the corporate sector<br>\nare sorted out.<\/p>\n<p>Even though some financial institutions have achieved higher<br>\ncapital-adequacy ratios, too little has been done to sort out<br>\nnon-performing loans. Financial institutions need to do more to<br>\nimprove credit risk assessment and lending practices while being<br>\nmore aggressive about asset quality to force corporate<br>\nrestructuring.<\/p>\n<p>While some monitoring of market activity may be needed to<br>\nguarantee fair competition, there can be less government<br>\nintervention by allowing markets to have a larger role in<br>\nimposing market discipline. A market-oriented system will<br>\nintroduce pressures from shareholders and creditors combined<br>\nwith competition and the threat of bankruptcy will impose<br>\ndiscipline upon companies.<\/p>\n<p>Until there is privatization of the nationalized commercial<br>\nbanks, there will be further delays in bank-led restructuring of<br>\nthe corporate sector. And there should be less interference by<br>\nthe government in the management of banks to ensure that their<br>\nactions are autonomous and meet global standards of operation.<\/p>\n<p>Part of the delay has been prompted by a misguided fear that<br>\nhasty disposal would allow foreigners to acquire valuable assets<br>\nat \"fire sale\" prices. The error in this reasoning should be<br>\nobvious.<\/p>\n<p>First of all, it is better to have a short, sharp shock so<br>\nthat the system can begin to recover quickly. Secondly, low<br>\nprices paid by private sources will relieve taxpayers of<br>\nadditional burdens and allow enterprises to become the source of<br>\ntax revenues rather than a continuing drain on public coffers.<\/p>\n<p>And the implicit economic nationalism that resists foreign<br>\npurchase of distressed assets defies market logic. For these<br>\nsales are a positive-sum game where both parties find themselves<br>\nin improved situations. It is erroneous to present such<br>\ndivestments as a zero-sum game where the gains of a buyer are<br>\nswamped by losses to the seller.<\/p>\n<p>With the decision made to return assets held by Indonesian<br>\nBank Restructuring Agency (IBRA) to private control, it should be<br>\ndone sooner rather than later. Yet more delays are on the table<br>\nthat include offering improved terms for the debtors who<br>\nsquandered Indonesia's resources. This is a travesty on both<br>\naccounts.<\/p>\n<p>It would be better to give away all the assets rather than to<br>\nleave them locked up in a non-productive condition. It is bad<br>\nenough that capital is being withheld from a stagnating economy,<br>\nbut it is also certain that asset quality will continue to<br>\ndeteriorate due to depreciation.<\/p>\n<p>As it is, taxpayers, especially those of future generations,<br>\nmust pay for the bank-restructuring program. One of the most<br>\npressing problems is Indonesia's exceptionally high public-sector<br>\ndebt. It turns out that the burden of public-sector debt per<br>\ncapita is almost double Indonesia's annual per capita GDP.<\/p>\n<p>Prior to 1997, Indonesia's outstanding debts were less one-<br>\nquarter of GDP.They now exceed 80 percent of GDP.  Under the<br>\nweight of this debt is a potential fiscal disaster that could<br>\noccur in 2004 when a large proportion of existing government<br>\nbonds will come to maturity.<\/p>\n<p>Much of the public-sector debt was incurred from bonds worth<br>\nRp650 trillion (US$64 billion) to assist with bank<br>\nrecapitalization, equal to about half the GDP at the time. This<br>\nmade it the largest amount spent for bank bailouts by any country<br>\nin the world. This process was monumentally mishandled and forced<br>\nthe central bank to a state of illiquidity.<\/p>\n<p>Most of the bonds require repayment of principal within 5-7<br>\nyears of their issue dates. Of the total, nearly Rp130 trillion<br>\nis must be redeemed during 2003.<\/p>\n<p>Interest payments on this debt are consuming a significant<br>\nportion of the public-sector budget, with payments on interest<br>\nand principal currently consuming about one-third of government<br>\nrevenues. During 2001, about Rp80 trillion in interest must be<br>\npaid out to holders of bonds.<\/p>\n<p>In the first instance, the endless political maneuvering must<br>\nstop so there can be a restoration of confidence that the right<br>\npolitical decisions can be made and implemented. Unfortunately,<br>\nthere is no indication that there is any responsible or strategic<br>\nthinking on how to repay these vast sums, which are equivalent to<br>\nabout 65 percent of annual GDP.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, there have been never-ending rounds of turmoil at<br>\nBank Indonesia and questions about the determination of the<br>\nleadership of IBRA to sell off assets.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia's serious economic problems require hard decisions<br>\nthat must be made soon. To date, none of the past, present or<br>\nprospective leaders have offered a vision of Indonesia's future.<br>\nInstead of expressing concern for the well being of the<br>\ncitizenry, they seem more focused on their own bank accounts or<br>\nproviding favors for special interests.<\/p>\n<p>It is important to break the cycle whereby legislators and<br>\nmembers of the executive branch engage in internecine bickering<br>\nor look after their own personal interests. Otherwise, the<br>\neconomic future of all Indonesians will be squandered.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/speed-the-sales-of-assets-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}