{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1034020,
        "msgid": "some-tips-on-making-windows-95-run-more-efficiently-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-06-24 00:00:00",
        "title": "Some Tips on Making Windows 95 run more efficiently",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Some Tips on Making Windows 95 run more efficiently By Zatni Arbi JAKARTA (JP): As Jakarta's toll road fee hops again, life goes on and operating system changes. Now that most of the tools that I need to accomplish my tasks are already available in Windows 95 version, I finally feel comfortable enough to move completely to the new environment -- almost one year after its official release.",
        "content": "<p>Some Tips on Making Windows 95 run more efficiently<\/p>\n<p>By Zatni Arbi<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): As Jakarta's toll road fee hops again, life goes<br>\non and operating system changes. Now that most of the tools that<br>\nI need to accomplish my tasks are already available in Windows 95<br>\nversion, I finally feel comfortable enough to move completely to<br>\nthe new environment -- almost one year after its official<br>\nrelease. And, just when I am moving to Windows 95, Windows 4.0 is<br>\nalready being talked about as its logical replacement, since most<br>\nWin95 application software can also run in Windows 94. Boy, can<br>\nwe ever keep up with all these?<\/p>\n<p>Well, since we have to work and do not just play around with<br>\nour personal computers, I think we should be careful in making<br>\nour moves, at least as far as operating system is concerned. Like<br>\nso many other things in life, it is not always the case that the<br>\nnew is better than the old. Take my favorite CorelDRAW!, for<br>\ninstance. The new Windows 95 version -- CorelDRAW! 6.0 -- had<br>\nonly some minor changes that I did not even bother to review. In<br>\nfact, I still strongly regret having paid US$ 275 for the<br>\nupgrade.<\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, here I am in the new, much hyped world. And here<br>\nare some tips that I would like to share with those of you who<br>\nhave just started to work in Windows 95. I just assume a Windows<br>\n95 already installed on one's PC and procede with how to make it<br>\nrun faster.<\/p>\n<p>But, a small reminder before I go on: the \"Control Panel\"<br>\nfolder is probably the most important starting point. One can<br>\naccess this folder by clicking on the \"Start\" button, \"Settings\",<br>\nand \"Control Panel\". One should better study carefully each of<br>\nthe files that the folder contains; particularly the \"Display\",<br>\n\"Add new hardware\", \"Add\/remove new software\", and \"System\"<br>\nfiles. One should open them one by one in order to learn what one<br>\ncan do with their help.<\/p>\n<p>Fine tuning<\/p>\n<p>The most important thing to keep in mind is that Windows 95<br>\nwill not run efficiently as long as one still uses the old<br>\nWindows 3.x 16-bit device drivers. Therefore, the first thing to<br>\ncheck is whether any of these old drivers are still being used by<br>\none's Windows 95. Find the \"My Computer\" icon on the desktop<br>\n(it's usually located on the top left corner of your screen), and<br>\nclick on it with the right mouse button. Click on the<br>\n\"Properties\" menu item, and the \"System Properties\" dialog box<br>\nwill appear. One can learn a lot about one's PC through this<br>\ndialog box, including about its performance. By the way, one can<br>\nalso access this dialog box from the \"Control Panel\" folder; just<br>\nclick on the \"System\" icon, which is usually the last one on the<br>\nbottom row.<\/p>\n<p>Go to the \"Performance\" tab -- one can move by hitting the<br>\nright arrow or clicking directly on the tab. If the system does<br>\nnot perform optimally, there will be a window that provides some<br>\nexplanation as to what is wrong. One can also click on the<br>\n\"Details\" button found under the window to get more detailed<br>\nexplanation.<\/p>\n<p>If, on the other hand, it performs as it should, the file<br>\nsystem and virtual memory should be both working in the 32-bit<br>\nmode. If one has compressed one's hard disk(s) with Windows 95's<br>\n32-bit DriveSpace utility and has a PC Card (the new name of<br>\nPCMCIA card), one should also work in the same 32-bit mode.<\/p>\n<p>If a problem occurs and Windows 95 runs in the DOS<br>\ncompatibility mode, one can go back to the \"Device Manager\" tab,<br>\nand double-check the offending device driver. One should then<br>\nreplace it with the new, Windows 95 version. Like many other<br>\nthings in life, the Internet is the best place for the latest<br>\nversion of device drives, although one may have a hard time<br>\nfinding one's way around until one gets to their source.<\/p>\n<p>Before one quits the \"System Properties\" dialog box, one<br>\nshould go back to the \"Performance\" tab and check whether the<br>\nother subsystems are optimized. Check the file system performance<br>\nfurther by clicking on the \"File System\" button. The typical role<br>\nof the PC should be set correctly, whether it is intended to work<br>\nas a desktop PC, a notebook or a network server. More<br>\nimportantly, the read-ahead optimization's sliding button should<br>\nbe at the \"Full\" end.<\/p>\n<p>If one has a CD-ROM drive, one might just as well move to the<br>\n\"CD-ROM\" tab. If one has more than 8 MB of RAM, one can set the<br>\ncache size to \"Large\"; if one has 8 MB or less, set the sliding<br>\nbutton to the left. Also, set the optimization according to the<br>\nmaximum speed of one's CD-ROM drive: Single-speed, Double-speed,<br>\nTriple-speed, or Quad-speed and higher.<\/p>\n<p>Click \"OK\" to go back to the \"Performance\" tab, and click on<br>\nthe \"Graphics\" button. Check the graphics accelerator whether it<br>\nis running at full speed. Then click \"OK\" again to return to the<br>\n\"Performance\" tab. Click on the \"Virtual Memory\" just to make<br>\nsure that it is set to be managed automatically by Windows 95.<br>\nUnless one is really short on hard disk space, one would better<br>\nlet Windows 95 manage it by itself. If, however, one has very<br>\nlimited space, one can then specify the maximum size of the swap<br>\nfile thus leaving some space for new data. If necessary, one can<br>\nalso force Windows to move the swap file to a different hard disk<br>\n-- preferably a faster one.<\/p>\n<p>The display<\/p>\n<p>During installation, Windows 95 also detects what kind of<br>\ngraphics card one has. One will probably encounter no problem if<br>\none has a popular brand graphics card on one's PC. It may also<br>\nhappen that the operating system installs a generic video driver<br>\nfor the graphics card that one has. Of course, this will not<br>\nnecessarily bring about the best performance. So, while at it,<br>\none can check whether the right display driver is installed.<\/p>\n<p>Go to the \"Control Panel\" folder again, and click on<br>\n\"Display\". Or, click on the desktop and click on \"Properties\". On<br>\nthe dialog box that appears, click on the \"Settings\" tab, and<br>\nthen click on the \"Change Display Type\" button. See whether<br>\nWindows is using the correct display driver. Otherwise, put the<br>\ndiskette containing the Windows 95 display driver that is<br>\nsupplied by the hardware manufacturer in the drive and click on<br>\nthe \"Change\" button. The rest is just a matter of clicking on the<br>\n\"OK\" buttons.<\/p>\n<p>If one has downloaded the software driver from Internet,<br>\nchances are that the file is compressed using PKZIP or LHARC. If<br>\nthat's the case, open a DOS window, create a temporary<br>\nsubdirectory on the hard disk, copy the file into it together<br>\nwith the right decompress utility, and decompress it. Then, in<br>\norder to install the new driver, specify the location of the<br>\nfiles in the dialog box that appears after clicking on \"Change<br>\nDisplay Type\".<\/p>\n<p>One of the readers of this column was very kind to provide me<br>\nwith the latest version of the driver for the Diamond Stealth 64<br>\ngraphics card that I installed on a friend's new Pentium PC.<br>\nSince the file was compressed, I followed the above mentioned<br>\nprocedure. After the right driver is installed, however, Windows<br>\n95 will definitely run more smoothly.<\/p>\n<p>What to do if one does not have the right software driver for<br>\nthe display card? One can select the closest one from the list of<br>\ninstalled drivers that Windows 95 has copied to one's hard disk<br>\nduring installation. If worse comes to worse, use the generic<br>\nSuperVGA driver, and select the highest refresh rate that one's<br>\nmonitor can handle.<\/p>\n<p>Keep it lined up<\/p>\n<p>Icons can move around, particularly if one haven't played with<br>\nSolitaire often enough to master the art of the mouse perfectly.<br>\nWhat to do to avoid unruly display of icons? In each folder<br>\nopened, click on \"View\" first, then \"Arrange Icons\", and then<br>\n\"Auto arrange\". This would allow the icons to line up in the<br>\nproper order even if one resizes the folder's window.<\/p>\n<p>Windows 95 Desktop can also become cluttered because the icons<br>\nare scattered everywhere. The quick remedy is to click with the<br>\nright mouse button anywhere on the desktop, and to choose<br>\n\"Arrange Icons\" from the list that appears. Again, use the \"Auto<br>\narrange\" option. This would give the desktop a tidier look.<\/p>\n<p>Stay tuned for more tips.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/some-tips-on-making-windows-95-run-more-efficiently-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}