{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1815683,
        "msgid": "smart-because-of-ai-or-smart-in-using-ai-1782093145",
        "date": "2026-06-22 08:13:34",
        "title": "Smart Because of AI or Smart in Using AI?",
        "author": "Retizen",
        "source": "REPUBLIKA",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Technology",
        "summary": "The widespread adoption of AI tools like ChatGPT among students is transforming education in Indonesia, offering unprecedented access to knowledge and personalised learning. However, this convenience raises concerns about the erosion of critical thinking, independent problem-solving, and academic integrity. The article argues that the focus should not be on banning AI, but on teaching students to use it as a collaborative tool to enhance, rather than replace, their own intellectual development.",
        "content": "<p>Who would have thought that technology once confined to science\nfiction films would now sit comfortably in the hands of students?\nArtificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a foreign concept but has\nbecome an integral part of how the younger generation learns, completes\nassignments, and even shapes their thinking. From ChatGPT, which can\nexplain complex subjects in seconds, to various AI-based learning\napplications, everything is accessible and affordable. This phenomenon\nis not a fleeting trend; it mirrors a significant shift in global\neducation, and Indonesia is no exception. In classrooms, boarding\nhouses, and campus coffee shops, students open their laptops or phones,\ntype a question, and receive an answer instantly\u2014a process that once\nrequired hours of library research.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond mere convenience, AI serves as a companion for exploration. A\nstudent curious about quantum physics, for example, no longer needs to\nwait for the right semester or rely on a single textbook. They can delve\ninto the topic immediately, with explanations tailored to their level of\nunderstanding. This represents an intellectual freedom previously\nenjoyed only by the economically or geographically privileged. AI holds\nimmense potential to democratise education, allowing students in remote\nareas to access the same quality of information as those in major\ncities, provided they have an internet connection. If harnessed\ncorrectly, this could fundamentally reshape Indonesia\u2019s educational\nlandscape and narrow long-standing disparities.<\/p>\n<p>However, a troubling trend is emerging alongside these benefits. Many\nstudents now bypass the thinking process entirely, submitting\nassignments generated by AI with a simple copy-and-paste. The process is\nfast and the output is polished, but something crucial is lost: the\nability to be confused, to make mistakes, and to independently find a\nway out. It is precisely this struggle that shapes genuine\nunderstanding. A paradox arises where increasingly sophisticated tools\ncreate a greater temptation to stop thinking. When answers are available\nat a single tap, the patience to wrestle with a problem\u2014to sit, reflect,\nfail, and try again\u2014slowly fades. True comprehension is built during the\njourney of discovery, not by reading a ready-made answer.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, academic integrity is at stake. Submitting work entirely\ngenerated by AI without disclosure has become so common that it is often\nno longer seen as a serious issue. This is not merely about cheating; it\nis about a gradual erosion of trust between students, educators, and\ninstitutions. Such a fracture is not easily mended, as it touches\nsomething deeper than grades or certificates. The solution, however, is\nnot outright prohibition. Banning AI in education is as futile as\nbanning calculators in the modern era. The focus must shift from the\ntool itself to the manner of its use. AI is most valuable when it acts\nas a thinking partner\u2014broadening perspectives, checking logic, or\nproviding an initial overview\u2014while the process of understanding remains\nfirmly a human endeavour.<\/p>\n<p>This responsibility does not rest solely on students. Educational\ninstitutions must formulate clear, sensible policies that guide the\nappropriate use of AI in academic contexts, rather than issuing blanket\nbans that are easily ignored. Educators need to adapt by designing\nassignments that cannot be fully completed by machines and by\nprioritising the visible process of thinking over a perfectly polished\nfinal product. Ultimately, students must recognise that the ability to\nthink is a skill that requires constant practice and cannot simply be\ndelegated. AI can be an extraordinary partner, but it cannot replace\ncuriosity, critical thinking, or the honesty that should form the core\nof the learning experience. The generation that grows up with AI while\nretaining the ability to think critically and act with integrity will be\nthe one truly prepared for the future.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/smart-because-of-ai-or-smart-in-using-ai-1782093145",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}