{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1229258,
        "msgid": "seeking-a-fit-and-proper-test-for-ri-ambassadors-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-06-25 00:00:00",
        "title": "Seeking a fit and proper test for RI ambassadors",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Seeking a fit and proper test for RI ambassadors Siswo Pramono, Phd Candidate, Australian National University, Canberra, s8851447@student.anu.edu.au The House of Representatives retains the constitutional mandate to advise the President whether a candidate is suitable to be appointed as an ambassador. But what does the House Commission I use as a yardstick to determine what is \"fit and proper\" in order to carry out such an important judgment?",
        "content": "<p>Seeking a fit and proper test for RI ambassadors<\/p>\n<p>Siswo Pramono, Phd Candidate, Australian National University,<br>\nCanberra, s8851447@student.anu.edu.au<\/p>\n<p>The House of Representatives retains the constitutional<br>\nmandate to advise the President whether a candidate is suitable<br>\nto be appointed as an ambassador. But what does the House<br>\nCommission I use as a yardstick to determine what is \"fit and<br>\nproper\" in order to carry out such an important judgment?<\/p>\n<p>Age was one major factor behind the recent rejection by the<br>\nHouse of some ambassadorial candidates. For instance, Rezlan<br>\nIzhar Jenie was considered too young while Abdul Irsan was<br>\nconsidered too old. But age is irrelevant in the quest to<br>\ndetermine who is a good diplomat.<\/p>\n<p>Baron Schelto van Heemstra, the Dutch Ambassador to Indonesia,<br>\nis 61. Ralph Boyce was 49 when he was confirmed by the U.S.<br>\nSenate as the ambassador to Indonesia. The two are neither too<br>\nold nor too young for the job.<\/p>\n<p>With the on-going reform at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,<br>\nin which many directorates are now headed by career diplomats in<br>\ntheir early 40s, it is likely that Indonesia will have even<br>\nyounger ambassadorial candidates. Consequently, a professional<br>\ndiplomat might serve as ambassador more than once during his or<br>\nher career.<\/p>\n<p>The House's rejection of the candidacy of those who had<br>\npreviously been appointed as ambassadors, too, while logical, is<br>\ncontrary to international practice. Van Heemstra, for instance,<br>\nheld various ambassadorial posts in Lusaka, Buenos Aires and<br>\nParamaribo before serving in Jakarta. This is, therefore, not a<br>\nunique case to be dismissed in the hearing.<\/p>\n<p>The hearing by the House is nevertheless an important step to<br>\nattain effective diplomacy. The improvement of the quality of our<br>\ndiplomats is in fact a pressing need. There have been incidents<br>\nthat show the capability, behavior, and lifestyle of some<br>\ndiplomats had fallen somewhat short of expectations and hence<br>\nimpeded the achievement of diplomatic goals.<\/p>\n<p>The immediate goal of our diplomacy is to grab all<br>\ninternational and domestic opportunities to help Indonesia remove<br>\nitself from the multi-dimensional crisis. There are tremendous<br>\nchallenges in attempts to reconcile the political and economic<br>\nprocess with the international environment.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of World War II, the victors provided a blueprint<br>\nof international relations -- the Atlantic Charter. No one<br>\nprovided such a blueprint for a post-Cold War world. As such, our<br>\neconomic diplomacy failed to foresee the Asian economic meltdown<br>\nin 1997. And now, as Indonesia is struggling to survive the deep<br>\nimpact of the regional crisis, it has to face a new, dangerous,<br>\nsecurity meltdown in the wake of Sept. 11. Thus, diplomacy is no<br>\nlonger business as usual.<\/p>\n<p>But judging the diplomatic profession is a daunting task.<br>\nThere are \"shoulds\" and \"should nots\" that the House must<br>\nconsider.<\/p>\n<p>First, the fit and proper test must not drag the diplomatic<br>\nprofession into party-politics since this will diminish our<br>\ndiplomatic capability in international fora. In other words the<br>\nambassadorial candidates must not seek political support from (or<br>\nengage in lobbying with) political parties to pass the test.<br>\nOtherwise, the practitioners of diplomacy will be fragmented by<br>\nthe competing, if not selfish, partisan politics. An ambassador<br>\nis the envoy of the whole nation, not the representative of<br>\npolitical party.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the constitutional mandate of the House<br>\nnotwithstanding, the appointment of ambassadors remains the<br>\nprerogative of the president, as head of state. The appointment<br>\nof Soemadi D.M. Brotodiningrat as envoy to the U.S., despite<br>\nobjections from the House, provides a constitutional precedence.<\/p>\n<p>Last but not least, the House must formulate an objective<br>\nyardstick for the fit and proper test. This must include an in-<br>\ndepth observation of the leadership style, intellectual capacity,<br>\nand personal integrity of the candidate.<\/p>\n<p>Such personality, according to Harold G. Nicolson, a British<br>\ndiplomat, in his book Diplomacy, includes truthfulness,<br>\nprecision, composure, good temper, patience, modesty and loyalty<br>\n(to the nation). While not forgetting the fact that diplomats are<br>\nonly human, the test must be able to find in every candidate the<br>\nevidence of such basic virtues. A good personality will harness<br>\nthe intellectual capacity.<\/p>\n<p>Diplomats, like other professionals benefit from special<br>\ntraining and education. Thus, the test must be able to reveal the<br>\ncandidate's eagerness to maintain an attitude of learning<br>\nthroughout life (iducation permanente). This intellectual<br>\ncapacity provides a strong foundation for the candidate's<br>\nleadership.<\/p>\n<p>Leadership is the most important requirement for an ambassador<br>\nand thus the test must be able to identify the leadership style<br>\nof the candidates. After all, running a diplomatic mission is an<br>\nexercise in teamwork, not a one-man show. A good ambassador is a<br>\ngood manager.<\/p>\n<p>If the test is to be taken seriously, then the question is:<br>\nCan the House properly judge the personality, the intellectual<br>\ncapacity, and the leadership style of a candidate by simply<br>\nholding one meeting with the candidate, or by listening to the<br>\ncandidate's presentation for one hour or so?<\/p>\n<p>Abdul Irsan and Rezlan Izhar Jenie are career diplomats with<br>\nan outstanding track record and experience. The rejection by the<br>\nHouse for the sole reason that one is too old and the other is<br>\ntoo young has raised many questions about the validity of the<br>\ntest. The point is, the House must have a better yardstick in<br>\ncarrying out such an important task. Otherwise, good candidates<br>\nfail, and bad candidates will find ways to pass the test.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is also an official at the Ministry of Foreign<br>\nAffairs.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/seeking-a-fit-and-proper-test-for-ri-ambassadors-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}