{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1019259,
        "msgid": "sbsi-1447899208",
        "date": "1994-08-23 00:00:00",
        "title": "SBSI",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "SBSI From Jayakarta That the Department of Manpower has not recognized the existence of the SBSI (Prosperous Labor Union of Indonesia) is obviously a denial to human rights and Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution. The reason that the existence of the organization does not conform with the stipulation in Law No. 21, 1954 concerning the Agreement on Labor is not correct. On the contrary, it is the Department of Manpower that is not consistent with the constitution.",
        "content": "<p>SBSI<\/p>\n<p>From Jayakarta<\/p>\n<p>That the Department of Manpower has not recognized the<br>\nexistence of the SBSI (Prosperous Labor Union of Indonesia) is<br>\nobviously a denial to human rights and Article 28 of the 1945<br>\nConstitution. The reason that the existence of the organization<br>\ndoes not conform with the stipulation in Law No. 21, 1954<br>\nconcerning the Agreement on Labor is not correct.<br>\nOn the contrary, it is the Department of Manpower that is not<br>\nconsistent with the constitution. Besides, the department denies<br>\nthe existence of the Law No. 18, 1956 concerning the Rights to<br>\nestablish an organization and to hold a meeting that was ratified<br>\nfrom the ILO Convention No. 98.<\/p>\n<p>Also each labor organization is required to fulfill the<br>\nprovision of the Decision of Minister of Manpower No. 1, 1994. In<br>\nfact it is this very decision that has created law uncertainty,<br>\nbecause many regulations produced by the department after the<br>\nissuance of the minister's decision tend to violate the<br>\nprovisions of the higher law. The decisions benefit the<br>\nentrepreneurs and weaken the bargaining position of the labor.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the Minister's Decision No. 04, 1986 concerning<br>\nthe severance of work relation and the payment of separation pay<br>\nis quite contrary to the Law No. 12, 1964, concerning the<br>\nseverance of work relation in private companies. Another example<br>\nis the Minister's Decision No. 1108, 1986 is contrary to the Law<br>\nNo. 18, 1956.<\/p>\n<p>ARIST MERDEKA SIRAIT<\/p>\n<p>Executive Secretary<\/p>\n<p>SISBIKUM Foundation<\/p>\n<p>Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/sbsi-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}