{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1004759,
        "msgid": "saving-sumatras-elephants-1447893297",
        "date": "1994-09-10 00:00:00",
        "title": "Saving Sumatra's elephants",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Saving Sumatra's elephants Are the days when Sumatra's wild elephants can freely roam about over? One cannot help but foresee such a picture after learning of a proposal from Transmigration Minister Siswono Yudohusodo a few days back that culling the elephants' numbers is the only way of controlling the Sumatran pachyderm population. Siswono's plan includes shooting elephants with tusks longer than 30 centimeters.",
        "content": "<p>Saving Sumatra's elephants<\/p>\n<p>Are the days when Sumatra's wild elephants can freely roam<br>\nabout over? One cannot help but foresee such a picture after<br>\nlearning of a proposal from Transmigration Minister Siswono<br>\nYudohusodo a few days back that culling the elephants' numbers is<br>\nthe only way of controlling the Sumatran pachyderm population.<\/p>\n<p>Siswono's plan includes shooting elephants with tusks longer<br>\nthan 30 centimeters. He hopes his scheme will be able to achieve<br>\na balance between the number of animals -- there are about 4,000<br>\nelephants roaming 44 areas in Sumatra -- and their dwindling<br>\nhabitat, mostly caused by development of the region.<\/p>\n<p>As anyone can surmise, the battle between Sumatra's wild<br>\nelephants and development has been a one-sided affair. For<br>\ndecades, population growth, the expansion of agriculture and<br>\nlivestock raising, pollution, and the building of cities and<br>\nroads have diminished the quantity and quality of natural<br>\nhabitats worldwide.<\/p>\n<p>The case of Sumatra's wild elephants is no exception. They are<br>\nnot only considered an obstruction to development but also a<br>\npest: Some 14 people were reportedly killed by rampaging<br>\nelephants in Lampung province between 1989 and 1993. Over the<br>\nlast three years, more than 850,000 hectares of plantations in<br>\nRiau province were ransacked by the animals. Farmers, plantation<br>\nowners and forest concession holders have for years cried out for<br>\nrevenge.<\/p>\n<p>And Minister Siswono's culling plan seems to be the<br>\ngovernment's likely solution. But, perhaps, to prevent an even<br>\ngreater outcry from environmentalists who oppose the proposal,<br>\nyesterday Minister of Forestry Djamaloedin Soeryohadikoesoemo<br>\nannounced a softer policy for handling the Sumatran elephants.<br>\nWhile it outlines a plan for elephant utilization for tourism and<br>\nplantations, it says that \"overpopulation of elephants in certain<br>\nregions could be solved by using population control through<br>\nconservation procedures under the auspices of the Indonesian<br>\nInstitute of Sciences (LIPI).\"<\/p>\n<p>Although Djamaloedin's statement did not mention the specific<br>\nissue of \"overpopulation\", it hinted that some 700 elephants now<br>\nlive outside their natural habitats in Lampung province and thus<br>\none can guess that they would be the first group to be culled.<\/p>\n<p>We question whether culling and population control are the<br>\nonly solutions to solving the problem? In this age of<br>\n\"development\" it is understandable for people and government<br>\ndecision-makers to put economic considerations above everything<br>\nelse. Since agriculture, plantations and roads seem to have a<br>\ngreater economic value then the conservation of nature, a case<br>\ncan be made for sacrificing wild elephants in the name of<br>\n\"progress.\"<\/p>\n<p>But one should not forget that admirable pledge stipulated in<br>\nthe World Charter for Nature, adopted by the United Nations in<br>\n1982. It says, among other things, that \"humankind is part of<br>\nnature, that every form of life is unique and warrants respect<br>\nregardless of its worth to human beings, and that lasting<br>\nbenefits from nature depend upon the maintenance of essential<br>\necological processes and life-support systems and upon the<br>\ndiversity of life forms.\"<\/p>\n<p>On top of that, people need to recognize that the reasons for<br>\nthe existence of species and ecosystems may be more subtle and<br>\ninscrutable than simply supporting the economic desires of the<br>\ncurrent generation of consumers.<\/p>\n<p>Besides, it has been proven lately that biological resources<br>\nhave vast economic potential. So one should not underestimate the<br>\nfact that preserving Sumatra's wild elephants, and hence also<br>\nSumatra's rainforests, may have a future economic value that is<br>\nfar greater than merely as lots to be given away for the<br>\nresettlement of people.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, while we do not know for sure what the actual<br>\nprice of our biological resources is, we should not be too hasty<br>\nin making decisions on the basis of our current needs alone.<br>\nOtherwise, one day when the dust finally settles, we could be<br>\nleft with nothing but our greed.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/saving-sumatras-elephants-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}