{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1449769,
        "msgid": "sang-timur-affair-exposes-government-discrimination-1447893297",
        "date": "2004-11-11 00:00:00",
        "title": "Sang Timur affair exposes government discrimination",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Sang Timur affair exposes government discrimination Pandaya, Jakarta In recent years Indonesia has sadly been witnessing a wide variety of religious conflicts that have corroded the glue that keeps this multiethnic, multireligious nation together. Sectarian flare-ups have been occurring throughout the archipelago at higher frequency and magnitude. One major shock came in 1996 with the burning of churches in Situbondo, East Java.",
        "content": "<p>Sang Timur affair exposes government discrimination<\/p>\n<p>Pandaya, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>In recent years Indonesia has sadly been witnessing a wide<br>\nvariety of religious conflicts that have corroded the glue that<br>\nkeeps this multiethnic, multireligious nation together.<\/p>\n<p>Sectarian flare-ups have been occurring throughout the<br>\narchipelago at higher frequency and magnitude. One major shock<br>\ncame in 1996 with the burning of churches in Situbondo, East<br>\nJava. A few years later we were hit with the deadly Muslim-<br>\nChristian conflicts in Maluku and Sulawesi. On Christmas Eve<br>\n2000, over a dozen churches in almost all major cities were<br>\nsimultaneously bombed, killing many of the Christian worshipers<br>\ninside.<\/p>\n<p>This year, the increasingly volatile interreligious<br>\nrelationships have again been put to the test with the forced<br>\nclosure of a church at the Sang Timur Catholic school and the<br>\nsubsequent blockage of the school by a group of local Islamists<br>\nin Karang Tengah, Tangerang, just outside Jakarta.<\/p>\n<p>The incident, right on the capital's doorstep, following the<br>\nrevocation of the official permit to use the premises for worship<br>\nservices, has provoked quite a lot of heated debate on the<br>\nfreedom of religion as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution.<\/p>\n<p>This time the government can no longer sweep the discord under<br>\nthe carpet and pretend nothing serious happened, because the<br>\nmedia has exposed it.<\/p>\n<p>While the problem remains unresolved, (a concrete wall erected<br>\nby Muslims, is still in place, and 9,000 Catholics have nowhere<br>\nto worship) people wonder if religious tolerance will ever become<br>\nsomething of the past.<\/p>\n<p>The Sang Timur incident, in which members of the Islamic Youth<br>\nFront of Karang Tengah forcibly broke up Sunday mass on Oct. 3<br>\nand demanded the services be stopped for good, was an ugly<br>\ndisplay of religious discrimination, in which the majority<br>\nbullies the minority and the state just lets it happen.<\/p>\n<p>The local Muslim residents appointed themselves the sheriff on<br>\nthe pretext that they were legally enforcing the disputed 1969<br>\njoint ministerial decree that requires local residents'<br>\nendorsement whenever a place of worship is to be built.<\/p>\n<p>The decree, which the new Minister of Religious Affairs M.<br>\nMaftuh Basyuni insists on maintaining, remains in force despite<br>\nfierce opposition from religious minorities. Under the ruling, it<br>\nis practically impossible for the minority to build a place of<br>\nworship in the midst of the majority. This ruling also applies in<br>\nareas where Muslims are the minority, such as predominantly<br>\nChristian Papua, East Nusa Tenggara, South Sumatra, North<br>\nSulawesi and predominantly Hindu Bali.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously, the decree treats the followers of the majority<br>\nreligion, in any particular area, like a spoiled brat who can do<br>\nanything they wish, no matter if what they do in fact gives their<br>\nown religion a bad name. Imagine how chaotic Indonesia could be<br>\nif Hindus in Bali or Christians in Manado -- both in the majority<br>\n-- did the same thing at a mosque or a pesantren?<\/p>\n<p>In Jakarta, Christians bear the brunt of the discrimination<br>\nand threats of violence: Building a church is practically<br>\nimpossible, but they are subject to harassment, or even violence,<br>\nif they worship elsewhere. Likewise in Papua, the minority<br>\nMuslims find it difficult to get the locals' endorsement for a<br>\nmosque.<\/p>\n<p>The Sang Timur affair only gives credence to the fear of<br>\nIslamic extremism that finds fertile ground with the rise of<br>\n\"political Islam\" in this era of political reform. Since the fall<br>\nof strongman Soeharto in 1998, those promoting sharia as the<br>\nstate ideology have come out in the open without fear of<br>\npersecution. Along with them came the extremist groups like FPI<br>\n(Islam Defenders Front) cashing in on weak law enforcement and<br>\ntaking the law into their hands in the name of religion.<\/p>\n<p>Again, the Sang Timur affair is a case that illustrates how<br>\nthe government becomes part of the problem when there is<br>\nreligious tension. The revocation of the permit to use the<br>\nschool's hall for worship, after 12 years of letting them do it,<br>\nserves as a bad example of public policy making. It clearly<br>\nsmacks of systematic discrimination against the minority and<br>\nreduces the government's assurances of respecting pluralism to<br>\ncheap, empty slogans. Above all, such a forced closure of a place<br>\nof worship is not only against the Constitution, but also a<br>\nblatant abuse of human rights.<\/p>\n<p>The bizarre policies that have provoked the problem also<br>\nproves that state intervention in religious affairs often ends up<br>\nin disaster because such policies, alienates the minority and<br>\nsolves problems in favor of the majority.<\/p>\n<p>While the joint ministerial decree continues to stir up<br>\ndangerous religious sentiment, another debate has been brewing<br>\nover a bill on \"religious harmony\" drafted by the ministry of<br>\nreligious affairs during the Megawati regime. Academics have<br>\nwarned that if the bill eventually became law, the discrimination<br>\nwould be more institutionalized and sectarian conflicts would<br>\nonly worsen.<\/p>\n<p>All the conflicts that come with the weakening religious<br>\ntolerance would endanger the international recognition of<br>\nIndonesia's reputation as a place to learn religious harmony.<\/p>\n<p>The religious tensions call for intensive interfaith dialogs<br>\nwhich involve people at the grassroots level, where open<br>\nconflicts start. The hard work of institutions like the Center<br>\nfor Peaceful Religious Coexistence (PKUB), the religious ministry<br>\nand Interfidei has not yet reached the masses.<\/p>\n<p>The lack of tolerance and mutual understanding has given rise<br>\nto suspicions that any initiative by either side would have<br>\n\"Christianization\" or \"Islamization\" motives.<\/p>\n<p>The Sang Timur affair is the first actual case for the new<br>\nadministration of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to handle and prove<br>\nhis commitment to protecting pluralism in Indonesia. SBY's stand<br>\nis yet to be seen -- an interventionist or facilitator.<\/p>\n<p>The author is a staff writer for The Jakarta Post.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/sang-timur-affair-exposes-government-discrimination-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}