{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1404257,
        "msgid": "rules-of-debating-require-thought-reason-and-wit-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-08-07 00:00:00",
        "title": "Rules of debating require thought, reason and wit",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Rules of debating require thought, reason and wit JAKARTA (JP): Students nationwide, each handpicked by their universities, milled around the grounds of the University of Indonesia's schools of law and letters. Though thankfully not a literal demonstration for a noble cause, the event was one of a cause: The Indonesian Varsities English Debate 1998, the first national debate in Indonesia, was held to serve as a platform for future endeavors in debating.",
        "content": "<p>Rules of debating require thought, reason and wit<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Students nationwide, each handpicked by their<br>\nuniversities, milled around the grounds of the University of<br>\nIndonesia's schools of law and letters.<\/p>\n<p>Though thankfully not a literal demonstration for a noble<br>\ncause, the event was one of a cause: The Indonesian Varsities<br>\nEnglish Debate 1998, the first national debate in Indonesia, was<br>\nheld to serve as a platform for future endeavors in debating.<\/p>\n<p>Each team has three speakers, with seven minutes allocated for<br>\neach substantive speech, and five, for the \"wrap-up\" speech.<\/p>\n<p>The proverb \"better late than never\" applies in this case, but<br>\nmany students still wondered as to why it took so long for the<br>\nculture of debating to develop among Indonesian students.<\/p>\n<p>One of the five founders of UI-EDS and supervisor of the 25-<br>\nmember IVED'98 committee Hisar Maruli Manurung, or Ruli as he is<br>\nusually called, said a primary reason was the difficulty in<br>\nconvincing university administrators to promote the culture of<br>\ndebate.<\/p>\n<p>He said they were not supportive due to the fear of the spread<br>\nof \"bad thoughts\".<\/p>\n<p>\"They felt that new ideas could oppose university policies...<br>\nthey did not support any attempt to found a debating club,\" Ruli<br>\nsaid. He said that when the element of English was introduced,<br>\nthey jumped at the idea.<\/p>\n<p>\"I think universities now feel pressured to produce graduates<br>\nto compete in the global market, or at least, in the regional<br>\nmarket. So students must have English proficiency.\"<\/p>\n<p>When asked why was it that the first national debate here was<br>\nnot utilizing the national language, he said it had to do more<br>\nwith Indonesian debating history.<\/p>\n<p>\"It stems from the debating history here... how this debating<br>\nsociety began. There were some enthusiasts, me included, in<br>\n1994\/1995.<\/p>\n<p>\"We participated in some English debates... an experimental<br>\nextracurricular activity at UI,\" he said.<\/p>\n<p>In 1996, Ruli was UI's student of the year and the university<br>\nsent him to the ASEAN Varsities Debate in Kuala Lumpur with<br>\nJudithia Wirawan, the EDS' current treasurer.<\/p>\n<p>Ruli and Judithia have lost all their debates, but they came<br>\nhome with enough tricks of the trade to spill around.<\/p>\n<p>\"There were several aspects which I wanted to be exposed to.<br>\nMainly, one was English. The other, debating,\" said Ruli, now a<br>\nfaculty member of the University's School of Computer Science.<\/p>\n<p>\"If it was up to me to socialize the culture of debating, I<br>\nwould like to have an Indonesian debating event.\"<\/p>\n<p>Patsy Widakuswara, EDS external director and best speaker of<br>\nthis year's Indonesian Varsities English Debate, said the reason<br>\nEnglish was selected was to promote it on a national level. \"Once<br>\nwe do so, Indonesian students can compete on an international<br>\nlevel.\"<\/p>\n<p>If an existing international format could be worked on and<br>\nimprovised upon, an Indonesian format was in the pipeline, she<br>\nsaid. \"It's like exporting technology... first you import the<br>\nwhole thing and then we add on the local contents.\"<\/p>\n<p>Ruli said it would take a lot more than a format to teach<br>\nIndonesians to adhere to the rules of debating.<\/p>\n<p>\"Here what people normally regard as debating is one who<br>\nspeaks loudest, who gets to steal the forum, and dominate.<\/p>\n<p>\"Some debaters commented that this was not a debate, but a<br>\ndiscussion of opinions. In a debate, one must be able to<br>\ninterrupt your opponents, they said.\"<\/p>\n<p>The culture of interruptions and loudmouths is still deep-<br>\nrooted in minds, and the utilization of the Australasian format<br>\nwill teach people to accept differing opinions, he said.<\/p>\n<p>\"This is possible because with the format, we have seven-<br>\nminute speeches.\"<\/p>\n<p>\"So if someone really thinks that his or her opinion is right,<br>\nthe person can win on the merit of argument and not domination<br>\nover an opponent.\"<\/p>\n<p>What about selling lies to win points off an impossible<br>\nadjudicator?<\/p>\n<p>\"Adjudicators are supposed to represent a crossection of<br>\nsociety and sportive debaters would not let indications of what<br>\nthe adjudicators' backgrounds into their case-building.\"<\/p>\n<p>He said the adjudicators were also requested repeatedly not to<br>\nbring their prejudices into the debate.<\/p>\n<p>\"Say, if I were to advocate atheism to a religious<br>\nadjudicator, the only approach would be through scientific, or<br>\neven Darwinian approach, so to talk about physics and nature.<\/p>\n<p>\"(The argument) that we are basically cells and atoms and that<br>\nthere was no deity behind our creation. That this was all a<br>\nprocess of natural selection.\"<\/p>\n<p>Adjudicators were given a specific set of rules and they were<br>\ntold to look for matter, manner and method.<\/p>\n<p>When asked on how big a role eloquence and the use of English<br>\nplayed in the tournament, he judged it significant.<\/p>\n<p>\"I am sure that these institutions sent their students to this<br>\nevent because they spoke (well) in English, not because they were<br>\nlogical,\" he said.<\/p>\n<p>After speaking to chaperones of debators, he believed that<br>\nthere were several who had spent a lot of time abroad and took on<br>\na \"cocky\" attitude due to fluency in English.<\/p>\n<p>\"They have the obvious American and British accents, but when<br>\nI heard them debate, they had such shallow arguments.<\/p>\n<p>\"They see their opponents speaking broken English... so they<br>\nthink this is going to be an easy win.\"<\/p>\n<p>He added that he always reminded adjudicators that what was<br>\nimportant was the conveying of ideas, thoughts and logic.<\/p>\n<p>\"As long as they get their arguments across well, they don't<br>\nneed to choose the biggest words.<\/p>\n<p>\"They may speak with the most medok (heavy) Javanese accent.<br>\nThey might get their singulars and plurals, is's and are's wrong,<br>\nbut to me they have got a good manner.\" (ylt)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/rules-of-debating-require-thought-reason-and-wit-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}