{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1227626,
        "msgid": "ris-frail-press-freedom-1447899208",
        "date": "2002-09-05 00:00:00",
        "title": "RI's frail press freedom ",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "RI's frail press freedom Bimo Nugroho Director Institute for Studies on the Free Flow of Information (ISAI) Jakarta bimo@isai.or.id There is much hope that the current press freedom will encourage Indonesia to achieve its aim in becoming a solid civil society. But does this current freedom also liberate the media community?",
        "content": "<p>RI's frail press freedom<\/p>\n<p>Bimo Nugroho<br>\nDirector <br>\nInstitute for Studies on the<br>\nFree Flow of Information (ISAI)<br>\nJakarta<br>\nbimo@isai.or.id<\/p>\n<p>There is much hope that the current press freedom will <br>\nencourage Indonesia to achieve its aim in becoming a solid civil <br>\nsociety. But does this current freedom also liberate the media <br>\ncommunity?<\/p>\n<p>A Muslim group called the Majelis Mujahidin Indonesia (MMI) <br>\nrecently succeeded in persuading private television stations RCTI <br>\nand SCTV to stop airing a public service announcement about <br>\nplurality in Islam in Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>The MMI expressed strong concern that the announcement went <br>\nagainst religious teachings, and that it was Muslims, and not <br>\nIslam, that were plural.<\/p>\n<p>More recently, the electronic media community is facing the <br>\nthreat of a ban against broadcasting foreign programs, including <br>\nnews, which is the result of a broadcasting bill drawn up by <br>\nlegislators.<\/p>\n<p>All signs of efforts to curb the press need to be watched to <br>\navoid a repeat in history of the wounds inflicted on press <br>\nfreedom. Anyone certainly enjoys the freedom to issue a <br>\npublication. However, the media has grown rapidly during the <br>\neconomic crisis and faces tight competition leading to rigid <br>\nefficiency and even exploitation of workers, including <br>\njournalists.<\/p>\n<p>Except for a few media organizations with grants or other <br>\nkinds of financial support, those who cannot keep up have had to <br>\nclose down. The consequences have been unresolved conflicts <br>\nwithin several media companies.<\/p>\n<p>Such conflicts in the media industry have become inevitable, <br>\nand have worsened the conditions in several media organizations. <br>\nIn the capital alone, numerous disputes of various types have <br>\nbeen handled by the union division of the Alliance of Independent <br>\nJournalists (AJI) in Jakarta and the Jakarta Legal Aid Institute.<\/p>\n<p>Press freedom, which is still in its infancy, has not <br>\nliberated the media community from the fear of being a target of <br>\nviolence, state regulations or job security.<\/p>\n<p>Capital competition in the information sector has led to the <br>\ncollapse of several media companies. But it has also encouraged <br>\nnew experiments in media; some have failed while others have <br>\ncontinued. Creativity is thriving.<\/p>\n<p>Given these contrasting conditions, the task for new non-<br>\ngovernmental organizations (NGOs) working in the media is to <br>\nstrengthen the freedom of the press and assure that it continues. <br>\nIts vulnerability encourages civil society -- represented by <br>\nthese NGOs -- to work on three platforms: Law enforcement, media <br>\ncommunity empowerment and the empowerment of media consumers.<\/p>\n<p>In law enforcement, there are currently two alliances <br>\ninvolved, respectively advocating their version of the <br>\nbroadcasting bill and the bill on freedom to access information.<\/p>\n<p>The legislation process faced by these coalitions is mainly <br>\nhampered by the authorities in charge of passing laws, the House <br>\nof Representatives, for several reasons.<\/p>\n<p>First is the many interests contested in the broadcasting <br>\nbill, such as that of media owners. Second, the lack of knowledge <br>\nof legislators on the essence of these bills. But there is also <br>\nthe third factor, the lack of experience of activists in working <br>\nthe intricacies of the legislation process in the House. All <br>\nthese reasons may have contributed to the results so far of the <br>\ncontroversial articles in the broadcasting bill.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, complaints about the lack of professionalism in the <br>\nmedia still abound, and many people could not care less about <br>\njournalists' job security or the threats made to their lives.<\/p>\n<p>Under these conditions, press freedom is still fragile. It <br>\nlacks a solid constituent willing to defend it in the face of <br>\nthreats.<\/p>\n<p>The seeds of press freedom that sprouted when former president <br>\nSoeharto resigned can easily be crushed -- either by capital <br>\ninterest, the political elite or even society, which is <br>\nexasperated by a lot of insensible news churned out day by day.<\/p>\n<p>The article is based on a paper to be presented at the <br>\nInternational Roundtable on Journalism and Freedom of Expression, <br>\nSept. 9-12, 2002 in Bali<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/ris-frail-press-freedom-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}