{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1326911,
        "msgid": "ri-rejects-foreign-investment-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-06-30 00:00:00",
        "title": "RI rejects foreign investment?",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "RI rejects foreign investment? We, PT Southwest Screens & Filters (PT SSF), are a foreign investment subsidiary of Southwest Screens & Filters, S.A (SSF SA) Belgium. PT SSF has, as indicated in its financial statements from 1999 until 2002, experienced some losses. Therefore, every year PT SSF has submitted a tax claim. Our yearly tax assessment since 1999 until 2001 did not satisfy us at all as a dutiful foreign investment firm.",
        "content": "<p>RI rejects foreign investment?<\/p>\n<p>We, PT Southwest Screens &amp; Filters (PT SSF), are a foreign<br>\ninvestment subsidiary of Southwest Screens &amp; Filters, S.A (SSF<br>\nSA) Belgium.<\/p>\n<p>PT SSF has, as indicated in its financial statements from 1999<br>\nuntil 2002, experienced some losses. Therefore, every year PT SSF<br>\nhas submitted a tax claim. Our yearly tax assessment since 1999<br>\nuntil 2001 did not satisfy us at all as a dutiful foreign<br>\ninvestment firm. And our disappointment climaxed at the auditing<br>\nof our 2001 tax assessment (SPT) as detailed below:<\/p>\n<p>1. We reported our 2001 SPT in May 2002 (preceded by a<br>\npostponement demand).<\/p>\n<p>2. On March 24, 2003, we received by facsimile an \"order for a<br>\ntax audit\" dated July 31, 2002 issued by the Taxation Audit and<br>\nInvestigation Office of Special Jakarta One (KARIPKA).<\/p>\n<p>On March 28, 2003, we sent data requested by KARIPAKA to our<br>\ntax consultant, which was forwarded on and received by KARIPKA on<br>\nApril 7, 2003.<\/p>\n<p>3. On May 26, we received by fax the audit result, and on May 28,<br>\nwe returned to KARIPKA with supporting documents and details of<br>\ncalculation that proved there were mistakes in the auditor's<br>\ncalculations and perception. That day, they asked us to sign a<br>\n\"dossier of audit results\", which was without the investigator's<br>\nsignature. We still have not signed it.<\/p>\n<p>4. On June 2, we received the \"tax assessment (SKP) of tax<br>\nannouncement (SPT) 2001\" that was, in fact, issued on May 28,<br>\n2003, the day we submitted our objection and proof.<\/p>\n<p>It was really disappointing. How could a decision be made by<br>\nthe Tax Office without giving us time to defend our position on<br>\nthe audit result, which were obviously inaccurate? The<br>\nconsequence is one SKP report that clearly indicates a careless<br>\naudit. The calculation of the \"fiscal correction\" resulted from<br>\ncomparing the turnover we reported on the SPT with incoming<br>\ntransfers as recorded on our bank statement (with the assumption<br>\nthat all incoming transfers were from customers). But when we<br>\nrechecked the audit, we discovered miscalculations because of:<\/p>\n<p>1. The double summarization of one of our current accounts by the<br>\nadding of monthly and daily bank statements.<\/p>\n<p>2. In-house transfers were considered as incoming transfers from<br>\ncustomers.<\/p>\n<p>Certainly we will not accept the audit result, and we will<br>\nsoon submit an objection for processing. With such a bitter<br>\nexperience, we will not continue to invest in Indonesia, and<br>\ninstead remind future foreign investors to think deeper before<br>\ninvesting in Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>DOMINIQUE THURION, Managing Director, PT Southwest Screens &amp; Filters,<br>\nTangerang, Banten<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/ri-rejects-foreign-investment-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}