{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1375228,
        "msgid": "recouping-liquidity-loans-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-09-25 00:00:00",
        "title": "Recouping liquidity loans",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Recouping liquidity loans The finance ministry's one-month blitzkrieg to force 10 suspended and four nationalized banks to repay about Rp 140 trillion (US$12.7 billion) in emergency liquidity finance from the central bank should satisfy the public's clamor for harsh measures against what have long been widely perceived, rightly or wrongly, as bad bankers.",
        "content": "<p>Recouping liquidity loans<\/p>\n<p>The finance ministry's one-month blitzkrieg to force 10<br>\nsuspended and four nationalized banks to repay about Rp 140<br>\ntrillion (US$12.7 billion) in emergency liquidity finance from<br>\nthe central bank should satisfy the public's clamor for harsh<br>\nmeasures against what have long been widely perceived, rightly or<br>\nwrongly, as bad bankers.<\/p>\n<p>The parade of business tycoons arriving at the Attorney<br>\nGeneral's Office to face demands for payments or risk being<br>\ncharged with corruption could have succeeded in conveying the<br>\nmessage that the government is really serious about dealing<br>\nfirmly and objectively with recalcitrant bankers. Pictures and<br>\ntelevision footage of the businesspeople being hounded by<br>\nreporters upon arrival and when emerging from the chief<br>\nprosecutor's office could have been seen as a stigma to keep<br>\nother bankers on their toes.<\/p>\n<p>However, the results so far are still a long way from<br>\nachieving the ultimate goal of restructuring the banking<br>\nindustry. Even the ceding of Rp 177 trillion worth of a wide<br>\nrange of assets by bank owners through agreements signed at the<br>\nAttorney General's Office is simply the beginning of a long<br>\nprocess of recouping taxpayers' money.<\/p>\n<p>The Indonesian Bank Restructuring Agency (IBRA), which is in<br>\ncharge of ailing banks, and its Asset Management Unit (AMU), are<br>\nnow being overburdened with the complex valuation of the fixed<br>\nassets handed over by bankers. This not only requires property<br>\nvaluations but also the verification of thousands of documents<br>\nrelated to share certificates in more than 100 companies<br>\noperating in numerous areas. No less important is the task of<br>\nensuring that the companies in which IBRA now owns equity<br>\ncontinue to operate normally, otherwise the value of the shares<br>\nwould fall and what could eventually be recouped may be much less<br>\nthan what was originally assessed.<\/p>\n<p>Given the volume of this job and the variety of skills needed<br>\nfor the valuation, it is easy to see how costly are the<br>\noperations of both IBRA and its AMU. This cost, which is part of<br>\nthe overall cost of restructuring the banking industry under<br>\nfinancing support from the Asian Development Bank, the<br>\nInternational Monetary Fund and World Bank, could well be much<br>\nlarger than the Rp 15 trillion budgeted in the current fiscal<br>\nyear alone.<\/p>\n<p>It is therefore imperative that the hundreds of experts at the<br>\nAMU should be able to package the assets into such saleable forms<br>\nso as to get maximum net sales value. Most important too is that<br>\nall this process should be performed transparently to ensure<br>\nfairness based on market values.<\/p>\n<p>Nonetheless, as stated at the outset of this column,<br>\nrecovering the liquidity finance is not the ultimate goal but<br>\nmore of a means to discipline bank managers and owners, to make<br>\nowners bear a substantial portion of the losses of their banks.<\/p>\n<p>True, the central bank, as the lender of last resort, is<br>\nobliged by law to provide timely support to illiquid but solvent<br>\nbanks to prevent panics and runs. But as the case of the 10<br>\nsuspended and four nationalized banks shows, the central bank<br>\npumped liquidity finance not only to illiquid banks but also to<br>\ninsolvent ones.<\/p>\n<p>One may argue that it is extremely difficult to distinguish<br>\nbetween illiquidity and insolvency within the banking industry.<br>\nParticularly at a time when the rupiah has lost almost 80 percent<br>\nof its value against the American dollar, the political situation<br>\nis uncertain and most businesses are on the verge of bankruptcy<br>\nas a result of punitively high interest rates and a contracting<br>\neconomy.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, as most of the 14 banks were found to have<br>\nviolated the legal lending limits, meaning their intragroup<br>\nlendings far exceeded the ceilings set in the prudential<br>\nregulations, it is reasonable to suspect that some central bank<br>\nexecutives might have been linked to collusive deals with several<br>\nof the ailing banks. It is therefore legitimate to demand that<br>\nthe central bank's process of having injected so huge a sum of<br>\nliquidity support to the 14 banks be thoroughly audited to root<br>\nout corrupt bank supervisors. The bank restructuring process will<br>\nnever be completed if the central bank is not cleaned off venal<br>\nexecutives.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/recouping-liquidity-loans-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}