{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1113389,
        "msgid": "reconciling-quixotic-reform-pressures-1447899208",
        "date": "2001-08-20 00:00:00",
        "title": "Reconciling quixotic reform pressures ",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Reconciling quixotic reform pressures By Kusnanto Anggoro JAKARTA (JP): What is now the legitimate and justified reform question under the leadership of President Megawati Soekarnoputri? No sensible person would be capable of giving a satisfactory answer. Three years ago, in the immediate aftermath of the downfall of Soeharto, many could have answered the question with much greater certainty.",
        "content": "<p>Reconciling quixotic reform pressures<\/p>\n<p>By Kusnanto Anggoro<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): What is now the legitimate and justified reform <br>\nquestion under the leadership of President Megawati <br>\nSoekarnoputri? No sensible person would be capable of giving a <br>\nsatisfactory answer. Three years ago, in the immediate aftermath <br>\nof the downfall of Soeharto, many could have answered the <br>\nquestion with much greater certainty. However, developments and <br>\nevents during the reign of Abdurrahman Wahid have had a dazzling <br>\neffect on us regarding our view of our ongoing struggle for <br>\ndemocracy.<\/p>\n<p>Abdurrahman, or Gus Dur, is a great man, for sure. He remains <br>\nthe doyen of democracy, justice, and humanity, with his strong <br>\ncommitment toward pluralism, tolerance, peaceful resolution of <br>\nconflict and respect of human rights. More than any other <br>\npresident of Indonesia, he desacralized some of the state's <br>\nsymbols, including the State Palace and government bureaucracy. <br>\nHowever, he was incapable of managing an effective government. <br>\nHis style of leadership was too erratic, setting the tone to his <br>\nown orchestra, making it difficult for others to follow his <br>\nrhythm.<\/p>\n<p>Megawati has now taken up the presidency. The way she selected <br>\nher Cabinet appears to have negated earlier accusations that she <br>\nwas unable to decide things on her own. Many would consider her <br>\nas more capable than she appears, uncertain though her capability <br>\nmay be to rein in her coalition partners. For sure, the success <br>\nof Megawati's government will depend on dynamics in the <br>\nlegislature and the support of the state bureaucracy, both of <br>\nwhich were pretty well dominated by reluctant reformers, if not <br>\nconservatives.<\/p>\n<p>To purist democracy and human rights activists, Megawati's <br>\nascendancy will lead to the return of Soeharto-era forces into <br>\npolitical life, which could end Indonesia's road to democracy. <br>\nHer fervent nationalist patina may jeopardize regional autonomy. <br>\nThe creation of a state minister for communications and <br>\ninformation and the presence of a lieutenant-general at the helm <br>\nof the Ministry of Home Affairs and Regional Autonomy have <br>\nrevived fears of a return to an authoritarian past.<\/p>\n<p>These are all indeed legitimate worries. Soeharto's rule has <br>\nbecome a serious cause of distress and infringement of human <br>\nrights. A victim of the 1965 massacre is not able to turn a new <br>\npage before the previous page has even been read. The relatives <br>\nof students who were shot dead in the Trisakti and Semanggi <br>\nincidents in 1998 are hearing the new, before they have heard the <br>\ntruth of history. Victims of incidents in Lampung, Aceh, and East <br>\nTimor will not expect that the hurt in their hearts can be <br>\nforgotten before it is healed.<\/p>\n<p>Undoubtedly, the urgent need to restore peace and stability, <br>\nnational as well as regional, is the prerequisite for an economic <br>\nrecovery that will stimulate foreign as well as domestic <br>\ninvestment. This urgency may bring a more statist approach of <br>\ngovernance back to the fore.<\/p>\n<p>Megawati will be more determined to resort to military <br>\nsolutions than Abdurrahman; she will also be more cautious in <br>\nimplementing regional autonomy. She is a constitutionalist with a <br>\nmarked streak of legalism. Her close relations with the military <br>\nmay hinder trials of human rights abuses in East Timor, Aceh and <br>\nelsewhere.<\/p>\n<p>To a certain extent, this could create serious problems <br>\nbetween the Megawati government and civil society. Human rights <br>\nactivists may well be disappointed by the world discussing the <br>\nnew, before talking about resolving old problems. Their fears <br>\nhave been expressed in recent statements by rights activists in <br>\nNew York and Canberra and environmentalists in London; their <br>\nvoicing of opposition against closer military relations with <br>\nIndonesia's military has indicated such worries.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, one cannot expect too much from transitional regimes. <br>\nAs the scholar Samuel Huntington suggests, the building of <br>\ndemocracy requires a balance between excessive participation and <br>\npolitical institutionalization. Nick Kirtz presupposed the <br>\npersistence of transitional justice, in which laws could well be <br>\ninsufficient instruments to seek justice.<\/p>\n<p>Mohammed Ayoob has even suggested that \"adequate stateness\" <br>\n(of democracies) allows the use of coercive forces, including the <br>\nnational police and the military, so long as such decisions are <br>\nreached through democratic processes by institutions in <br>\nauthority.<\/p>\n<p>The tranquility of transition, especially a transition that <br>\nfailed to completely break with the past, would have to <br>\naccommodate the more pervasive aspects of the old regime.<\/p>\n<p>The psyche of transition pragmatically assumes obectives that <br>\nare more practical than idealistic. Democratic mechanisms such as <br>\ntransparency and accountability could well be more important than <br>\npurist democratic norms, values, and virtues. Megawati's <br>\ngovernment is hardly an exception. It may be nothing wrong, at <br>\nleast until 2004, to use extra-constitutional measures so long as <br>\nthey are morally legitimate and politically justifiable.<\/p>\n<p>After all, the struggle for reform, democracy and human rights <br>\nwill not stand still because Megawati tells it to. Those who want <br>\nto be part of the future must keep pace with changes in the <br>\ncourse of history. We must not be woven so intricately into the <br>\npast that we are unable calmly to turn our attention to the new. <br>\nPerhaps, the present struggle is for us to be more confident and <br>\nrealistic.<\/p>\n<p>There is simply no place now for a \"Don Quixote\", a man who <br>\nabsurdly tilted at windmills that he thought were monstrous <br>\ngiants.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Kusnanto Anggoro is a senior researcher at the Centre for <br>\nStrategic and International Studies and a lecturer in Strategic <br>\nStudies at the postgraduate studies program at the University of <br>\nIndonesia.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/reconciling-quixotic-reform-pressures-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}