{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1520075,
        "msgid": "ratification-record-of-human-rights-instruments-1447893297",
        "date": "1997-12-10 00:00:00",
        "title": "Ratification record of human rights instruments",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Ratification record of human rights instruments JAKARTA (JP): Since the adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948, the United Nations has sponsored 25 human rights covenants, conventions and protocols. When a nation ratifies an instrument, it becomes legally binding.",
        "content": "<p>Ratification record of human rights instruments<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Since the adoption of the Universal Declaration<br>\nof Human Rights in 1948, the United Nations has sponsored 25<br>\nhuman rights covenants, conventions and protocols.<\/p>\n<p>When a nation ratifies an instrument, it becomes legally<br>\nbinding.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps the three most important instruments, if not most<br>\noften cited, are the International Covenant on Economic, Social<br>\nand Cultural Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and<br>\nPolitical Rights and the Convention against Torture and other<br>\nCruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.<\/p>\n<p>What is the position of the state parties of the United<br>\nNations toward the three documents? The tally in the Human Rights<br>\nInternational Instruments Chart of Ratifications as of June 30,<br>\n1996, a United Nations publication, makes interesting reading.<\/p>\n<p>North Korea, Iran, Iraq and Libya have ratified the two<br>\ncovenants, meaning that their legislatures have passed the<br>\ncovenants into law. The four are United Nations members that the<br>\nU.S. State Department cites as \"rogue states\".<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, the United States has ratified the economic<br>\ncovenant and the antitorture convention. But for the political<br>\ncovenant, the United States has only given its signature, while<br>\nits ratification is still pending.<\/p>\n<p>With the exception of China, the four other permanent members<br>\nof the UN Security Council have ratified the three instruments.<br>\nChina has so far ratified the antitorture convention.<\/p>\n<p>With regard to the Association of Southeast Asian Nations<br>\n(ASEAN), now numbering nine members, only the Philippines has<br>\nratified all three. Vietnam has ratified the two covenants, alone<br>\namong the ASEAN members.<\/p>\n<p>Laos ratified the antitorture convention, and Indonesia signed<br>\nit on Oct. 23, 1985. Its ratification, however, is still on hold.<\/p>\n<p>Member-in-waiting Cambodia has ratified all three instruments.<\/p>\n<p>Of all 25 human rights instruments under UN auspices, Germany<br>\nhas ratified the most with 24, followed by the Netherlands and<br>\nNorway with 21 and Sweden with 20.<\/p>\n<p>The leader in Asia is the Philippines, which has signed 19<br>\nhuman right instruments. Among ASEAN, Cambodia has signed 11,<br>\nLaos nine, Singapore and Vietnam eight each, Myanmar and Malaysia<br>\nfive each, Indonesia four, Thailand three and Brunei one.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. has ratified 10, Japan nine and China 18. The Vatican<br>\nhas ratified four, excluding the three major instruments cited<br>\nabove.<\/p>\n<p>Warief Djajanto Basorie<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/ratification-record-of-human-rights-instruments-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}