{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1174995,
        "msgid": "quo-vadis-a-new-strategic-partnership-for-asia-africa-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-04-08 00:00:00",
        "title": "Quo vadis a new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Quo vadis a new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa JP\/6\/ANAK Quo vadis a new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa Anak Agung Banyu Perwita Bandung The values rooted in the Bandung Ten Principles (Dasa Sila Bandung) as the strategic output of the Asia-Africa Conference in 1955 continues to have a crucial and contextual meaning in regional and global interactions of today.",
        "content": "<p>Quo vadis a new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa<br>\nJP\/6\/ANAK<\/p>\n<p>Quo vadis a new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa<\/p>\n<p>Anak Agung Banyu Perwita <br>\nBandung<\/p>\n<p>The values rooted in the Bandung Ten Principles (Dasa Sila <br>\nBandung) as the strategic output of the Asia-Africa Conference in <br>\n1955 continues to have a crucial and contextual meaning in  <br>\nregional and global interactions of today. Cooperation between <br>\nAsian-African countries against colonialism remains relevant -- <br>\neven more so -- to fight today&apos;s common &quot;enemies&quot; of  economic, <br>\npolitical and social-cultural colonialism.<\/p>\n<p>In the context of changing international relations, Asian-<br>\nAfrican states must now deal with three major challenges, in the <br>\nfields of economic development, global peace and security -- <br>\nespecially terrorism, and global political restructuring.<\/p>\n<p>In the field of economic development, for instance, the latest <br>\nstudy conducted by the World Bank has shown that Asia has and <br>\nwill become one of Africa&apos;s biggest trading partners. Africa&apos;s <br>\ntrade value to Asia alone makes up about 16 percent annually <br>\n(1999-2001) of Africa&apos;s US$130 billion annual exports.<\/p>\n<p>The World Bank report also concluded that Asia could be a <br>\nstrategic market diversification target. Assuming that average <br>\neconomic growth of Asian countries is 5 percent annually, then <br>\nthe consumption level of these Asian nations of various African <br>\ncommodities will also increase. Therefore, the possibilities for <br>\nenhancing trade interactions between these two continents will <br>\nalso increase in the future.<\/p>\n<p>In order to bolster trade and economic interaction among <br>\nAsian-African countries, there are at least two shared agendas <br>\nthat need to be addressed.<\/p>\n<p>First, Asian-African countries should strengthen their <br>\ninformation networks regarding trade and investment in an effort <br>\nto more comprehensively understand the market dimensions of the <br>\ntwo continents.<\/p>\n<p>Second, the institutional arrangements between the two <br>\ncontinents should also be strengthened as a means to reinforce <br>\nstrategic dialog between Asian-African nations and to raise new <br>\nawareness regarding business opportunities among Asian-African <br>\nbusiness people.<\/p>\n<p>However, high-cost economies, limited infrastructure, and <br>\ninadequate numbers of well-trained people as well as the <br>\n&quot;complex&quot; legal systems of many developing countries, remains a <br>\npredicament in increasing the trade and investment volume between <br>\nthe nations of these continents.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, the effort to increase South-South <br>\ncooperation framework is not just an option, but rather an <br>\nimperative for Asian-African countries in order to increase their <br>\nwelfare in the midst of growing competition among nation-states. <br>\nThis South-South cooperation should become the main driving force <br>\nof development solidarity for Asia and Africa in the <br>\nglobalization era.<\/p>\n<p>The demand for reform of the UN Security Council, especially <br>\ncoming from nations of the Non-Aligned Movement, will depend <br>\nheavily on the political will of developing countries to reach a <br>\nconsensus to establish a common position. In many cases, NAM has <br>\nproven to be &quot;a house divided&quot; in dealing with shared issues in <br>\nthe realm of multilateralism, including the UN.<\/p>\n<p>Looking at several developments above, the opportunities for <br>\ncrafting a new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa remains wide <br>\nopen. However, the increasing degree and intensity of interaction <br>\ndoesn&apos;t just depend on traditional government-to-government <br>\nrelations. The phenomenon of globalization with its <br>\nmultidimensional nature should be able to function as driving <br>\nforce for the creation of a more systematic and patterned <br>\nintersociety interactions (people to people relations) between <br>\nAsia and Africa.<\/p>\n<p>So far, the interactions between the societies of Asia and <br>\nAfrica have been relatively limited.<\/p>\n<p>In many cases, a weak state\/government, poverty as well as the <br>\nmounting cultures of violence, have served as breeding grounds <br>\nfor terrorism and other trans-national crimes. Therefore, <br>\nindividual groups and societies in these two continents can play <br>\na crucial role in the new strategic partnership for Asia-Africa, <br>\nincluding in the war against terrorism in Asia and Africa.<\/p>\n<p>This Asian-African interaction can also be categorized as a <br>\n&quot;bilateral interregional relationship&quot;, hence the necessity to <br>\nincrease and enlarge the number of dialogs among groups in <br>\nvarious formal as well as informal meetings that should also come <br>\nfrom various groups of society in Asian-African nations <br>\nthemselves.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, societal groups in Asia and Africa as well as <br>\nvarious non-governmental organizations in their respective <br>\nsocieties, have to play their part as &quot;agenda initiators&quot; and <br>\neven as &quot;agenda controllers&quot; in the effort to increase the <br>\ninteraction amongst them while at the same time to complement the <br>\nformal interactions taking place at governmental\/state levels.<\/p>\n<p>This is in line with the statement by South African Deputy <br>\nMinister of Foreign Affairs, Aziz Pahad, who said that the <br>\nfoundation of the new partnership for Asia and Africa comprises <br>\nthree complementary levels: Governmental, sub-regional <br>\norganizational groups, and societies at large. In that form, this <br>\nkind of cooperation will lead to a strengthening of the <br>\n&quot;regionalism through interregionalism&quot; in the two continents.<\/p>\n<p>From the discussion above, we can see that the New Asia-Africa <br>\nStrategic Partnership has many challenges and opportunities. <br>\nGlobalization has provided alternative options in developing the <br>\ndegree and intensity of Asia-Africa relationships. However, to <br>\noptimize these new strategic options, a high level of political <br>\ncommitment is still required.<\/p>\n<p>The failure of Asian-African countries to unite their <br>\neconomic, social and political interests will simply turn the <br>\ncooperation forums established so far into new &quot;talk-shops&quot; in <br>\ncontemporary interregional relations.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a Senior Lecturer at the Department of <br>\nInternational Relations, Parahyangan Catholic University, <br>\nBandung.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/quo-vadis-a-new-strategic-partnership-for-asia-africa-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}