{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1377909,
        "msgid": "power-dictates-whether-proof-of-rape-exists-1447893297",
        "date": "1998-09-17 00:00:00",
        "title": "Power dictates whether proof of rape exists",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Power dictates whether proof of rape exists By Julia I. Suryakusuma JAKARTA (JP): \"Did the mass rapes (of ethnic Chinese women) really happen?\" Even before the work of the government-sponsored joint fact-finding team is completed, a number of government officials have raised this nagging question. This has sparked a public debate -- and generated much confusion -- which has served to obscure rather than clarify the matter.",
        "content": "<p>Power dictates whether proof of rape exists<\/p>\n<p>By Julia I. Suryakusuma<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): \"Did the mass rapes (of ethnic Chinese women)<br>\nreally happen?\" Even before the work of the government-sponsored<br>\njoint fact-finding team is completed, a number of government<br>\nofficials have raised this nagging question. This has sparked a<br>\npublic debate -- and generated much confusion -- which has served<br>\nto obscure rather than clarify the matter. This debate has<br>\ncentered around the presence or absence of bukti (evidence).<\/p>\n<p>In Indonesia, evidence is intimately connected to power, may<br>\nit be state power, parental power, male power or others.<br>\n\"Evidence\" requires the verification of those in power.<\/p>\n<p>In the absence of a legal system fully independent from the<br>\nexecutive (read: the military), \"evidence\" is ultimately<br>\nsomething held in the hands of the rulers.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, one might say that the presence of \"evidence\" is<br>\ninversely proportional to the accused party's proximity to power.<\/p>\n<p>Minister of Defense and Security Gen. Wiranto recently made a<br>\nstatement regretting that the Commission on Human Rights had<br>\nreleased a report about mass graves in Aceh, Sumatra, without<br>\nconsulting the Army first.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the exhumation of mass graves, as long as the military<br>\ndoubts these killings happened during this decade (for obvious<br>\nreasons of interest), it will not be said to be \"proven\".<\/p>\n<p>Or consider Soeharto's challenge to the public to \"prove\" his<br>\nwealth. It does not matter how many reports come out in the<br>\nmedia. For the moment, Soeharto is still confident enough in his<br>\npower, in the fact that he still controls the bureaucracy,<br>\ntherefore he knows there will not be a shred of evidence found.<\/p>\n<p>Evidence will not materialize if the perpetrators are<br>\nperceived to be a part of the same system of power as the<br>\ninvestigators and the judges.<\/p>\n<p>It is not surprising that women raped last May are unwilling<br>\nto give testimony to the police, submit their bodies to forensic<br>\nexaminations by government scientists. All the more so if they<br>\nare terrorized into keeping their mouths shut.<\/p>\n<p>The gap between the demands for evidence and the conditions of<br>\nthe traumatized victims, as well as the continued terror, and<br>\ndenials especially by government officials -- has been a major<br>\nhindrance in solving the crimes.<\/p>\n<p>Recently it has been suggested that since photos of rapes<br>\ncirculating on the Internet are not photos of the rapes which<br>\noccurred last May, that therefore the rapes never happened.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing could be more absurd. Some groups have announced that<br>\nthe rape photos circulating on the Internet were taken from a<br>\nbook about human rights violations in East Timor.<\/p>\n<p>One can only speculate about who would be interested in<br>\npassing these photos off as photos of the May rapes. However,<br>\ntheir recent misuse does not mean that the original photos were<br>\nengineered. In fact, the photos of sexual torture by men in<br>\nmilitary uniform in East Timor, also worthy of condemnation in<br>\nand of themselves, only supports the possibility of rapes in May<br>\nby \"trained groups\".<\/p>\n<p>It is exceedingly ironic that a regime built on the basis of<br>\nhistorical distortion and a culture of lies, should demand<br>\nevidence for an incident that has been officially recognized by<br>\nits own government.<\/p>\n<p>In the 32 years of New Order rule, the suffering of millions<br>\nof people has been ignored, for the sake of \"national stability\".<br>\nThey might consider speaking out, were it not for the fact that<br>\nthe people were continuously terrorized, pressured and<br>\nthreatened.<\/p>\n<p>In the New Order there is a tendency to conceal the truth.<br>\nEven figures of, say, casualties of a train accident are reduced<br>\nby the authorities, let alone incidents that are politically<br>\nloaded. This is also the case with figures on poverty,<br>\nunemployment and other social indicators.<\/p>\n<p>Evidence is often engineered, as in the cause celebre of<br>\nMarsinah (a female labor activist who was tortured and murdered<br>\nfor demanding higher wages), as well as Udin (a journalist who<br>\nwas investigating the suspected wealth of the Bantul regent), and<br>\nPak De (a traditional healer who was convicted, but most likely<br>\nframed, for the murder of Dietje, a former model who allegedly<br>\nhad a relationship with a member of the Soeharto family).<\/p>\n<p>All cases are yet to be solved, for lack of \"evidence\",<br>\nalthough it is heavily suspected that the military\/authorities<br>\nwere involved in all three instances.<\/p>\n<p>Corruption and the appropriation of the people's wealth is<br>\nconcealed by big \"development\" projects; decision-making in the<br>\neconomic and political spheres are never transparent; the<br>\nsystematic violation of human rights by the state apparatus is<br>\nmasked by the \"refined eastern culture\" (of the Javanese), where<br>\nthe corruptness and degeneracy of the rulers is festooned by<br>\nglittering state and military ceremonies.<\/p>\n<p>Elections which are flaunted as a \"festival of democracy\" in<br>\nfact are only a means to squander the people's money to<br>\nlegitimize the authoritarian rule of a few people, and one despot<br>\nin particular.<\/p>\n<p>In this context, the fact that the authorities can still<br>\ndemand evidence of the May rapes that clearly happened, is<br>\nevidence of their arrogance and lack of moral and political<br>\nresponsibility.<\/p>\n<p>\"Evidence\" and \"truth\" are connected to perception, which<br>\ncannot be separated from self-perception and self-interest. In<br>\nthe case of the May rapes, the government has political and<br>\neconomic interests in denying that the rapes happened.<\/p>\n<p>Politically, they may feel that recognizing the May rapes<br>\nwould undermine the authority of the government (and the<br>\nmilitary). Economically, it seems that some government officials<br>\nare defensive due to the pressure of countries populated by<br>\nethnic Chinese, such as Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and even<br>\nChina -- who have threatened economic sanctions if investigations<br>\ninto the case are not conducted satisfactorily.<\/p>\n<p>\"Evidence\" is not evidence. Concerning the May rapes, an<br>\nindependent organization could prove they occurred, as the<br>\nVolunteer Group for Humanity has done, by compiling confidential<br>\ntestimonies of victims. Whether the evidence is accepted is<br>\nanother matter.<\/p>\n<p>In the context of an authoritarian regime, what counts is not<br>\ntruth but power, often brute (military) power. The authorities<br>\ncan \"transform\" lies into \"truth\", as \"evidence\" is an object<br>\nthat they construct, control and have power over.<\/p>\n<p>The authorities have the means and resources to force their<br>\ninterpretation of an event and make it into a public truth. This<br>\nis something they have done historically, starting with their<br>\ninterpretation of the alleged Communist coup in 1965 which was<br>\nthe basis of New Order rule and the legitimator of the systematic<br>\noppression of the people.<\/p>\n<p>Indirectly, this interpretation (read: historical<br>\nmanipulation) is also the political basis for the discrimination<br>\nagainst the ethnic Chinese as the Indonesian Communist Party was<br>\nlinked to the communist party in China.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of the May rapes, by continually disbelieving the<br>\nevidence that has emerged, the government -- but also the media<br>\nand the public -- is treating the victims as the accused.<\/p>\n<p>\"Evidence\" is not the same as reality, witnesses, let alone<br>\ntruth. \"Evidence\" like truth can only emerge in a context that is<br>\nfree of fear, threats, prejudice, vested interest, an independent<br>\njudicial system, a society that is free from collusion,<br>\ncorruption and nepotism, a culture of openness, justice and<br>\ndemocracy, and a government which is pro-people.<\/p>\n<p>Only then will the \"evidence\" of the May rapes, which have<br>\nalready seared the conscience of many Indonesians and raised the<br>\nindignation and anger of the international community, be able to<br>\nbe found.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a social and political commentator, and an<br>\nactivist-member of the Indonesian Women's Coalition for Justice<br>\nand Democracy.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/power-dictates-whether-proof-of-rape-exists-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}