{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1169236,
        "msgid": "political-will-for-law-reform-1447893297",
        "date": "2005-08-18 00:00:00",
        "title": "Political will for law reform",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Political will for law reform Budiono Kusumohamidjojo, Jakarta It is redundant to state that Indonesia finds itself in a legal crisis, which makes it pertinent to ask why and how the country could manage to exist six decades following its political independence and simultaneously experience a constant deterioration in its legal system?.",
        "content": "<p>Political will for law reform<\/p>\n<p>Budiono Kusumohamidjojo, Jakarta<\/p>\n<p>It is redundant to state that Indonesia finds itself in a<br>\nlegal crisis, which makes it pertinent to ask why and how the<br>\ncountry could manage to exist six decades following its political<br>\nindependence and simultaneously experience a constant<br>\ndeterioration in its legal system?.<\/p>\n<p>The answer to this question is elusive, but one thing is for<br>\nsure: the long-lasting regimes of president Sukarno and president<br>\nSoeharto were both marked by a lack of will to seriously develop<br>\nthe legal system in order for the country to comply with the<br>\nrequirements of a modern state.<\/p>\n<p>They each had good reasons for such neglect. President Sukarno<br>\nwas busy trying to \"build a country out of nothing\" as was once<br>\nsaid by Daniel Lev. Sukarno had his hands full with nation-<br>\nbuilding almost throughout his entire time in office. Meanwhile,<br>\npresident Soeharto was kept busy trying to rescue Indonesia's<br>\neconomy from virtual bankruptcy and liberating the country (but<br>\nnot necessarily its people) from poverty.<\/p>\n<p>Following a turbulent period of social and political<br>\ntransition that marked the post-Soeharto era, to the astonishment<br>\nof the international public Indonesians managed to conduct an<br>\nopen, democratic and direct electoral process that resulted in<br>\nthe elevation of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as the sixth<br>\npresident of the Republic.<\/p>\n<p>The new President said that his first 100 days in office would<br>\nserve as a trial run for his ability to deliver the basic<br>\nexpectations of the people. The Aceh tsunami late in December<br>\n2004 became his real testing ground although it was completely<br>\noutside of his 100-day agenda. It would be unfair to judge his<br>\naccomplishments merely based on this alone.<\/p>\n<p>While the Aceh disaster has drawn international help due to<br>\nthe tremendous scale of destruction, Indonesians will need to<br>\nstand on their own two feet as regards law reform and effective<br>\nlaw enforcement. Indonesians seem to have learned something from<br>\nhistory by holding peaceful and orderly direct presidential<br>\nelections in September 2004 for the first time ever.<\/p>\n<p>With 60 percent of the vote, Indonesians granted President<br>\nSusilo's government indisputable legitimacy to establish good<br>\ngovernment. Indeed, Susilo's administration decided to place law<br>\nreform and law enforcement, along with economic reconstruction,<br>\nhigh on its agenda. Nonetheless, it soon turned out that<br>\nimplementation would be quite a different story.<\/p>\n<p>Approaching the completion of its first year in office in<br>\nOctober 2005, we have yet to see the law being enforced as it<br>\nshould be or how a clear direction for the development of the<br>\nlegal system is being set. We should admit that President Susilo<br>\ncannot be expected to do the job on his own and that no single<br>\nstrike will on its own be enough to successfully accomplish such<br>\na challenging mission.<\/p>\n<p>The establishment of the Constitutional Court and Judicial<br>\nCommission, for example, could prove to be pivotal in the<br>\nstructural development of Indonesia's legal institutions. This is<br>\na welcome development as the judiciary should always serve as the<br>\nultimate bastion of justice.<\/p>\n<p>A problem that is ubiquitous in countries still struggling<br>\nwith their legal systems is that the law enforcers and the<br>\njudiciary are frequently hampered in their professional<br>\nindependence. Rather than a strict separation from the political<br>\nprocesses, they are merely only slightly removed by a Chinese<br>\nwall that naturally allows vested political interests and<br>\nbickering to permeate into the realm of the law at the cost of<br>\njustice and legal certainty.<\/p>\n<p>A decisive government determined to uphold the law is<br>\nabsolutely essential. Needless to say, every government has a<br>\npolitical mission to accomplish, but, as Marcus Tullius Cicero<br>\nargued as early as the 1st century, no government is legitimate<br>\nif it does not work to uphold the law and establish justice.<\/p>\n<p>Consequently, legitimate governments should be dedicated to<br>\nthe same objectives, and differ from each other only in their<br>\nrespective strategies. An implication of this is that they must<br>\nhave the political will to transparently uphold the law and<br>\nestablish justice.<\/p>\n<p>It is well understood that enlightened governments in<br>\ncountries that are yet to establish a functioning legal system<br>\nface a daunting challenge from powerful stakeholders enjoying the<br>\nbenefits of a dysfunctional legal system and widespread<br>\ninjustice.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, such enlightened governments must do their utmost<br>\nto ensure the establishment of a functioning legal system that<br>\nensures the upholding of the law and establishment of justice.<br>\nThere is no doubt that to win such a fierce fight they will<br>\nrequire boundless courage. But that is indeed a key qualification<br>\nfor one who is determined to govern a country, even more so if<br>\nthat country is Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than questioning the legitimacy of Susilo's government,<br>\nIndonesians prefer to watch him work towards goals that are<br>\ncommensurate with their expectations. To date, the President<br>\nstill has a lot of leeway to demonstrate his determination to<br>\ndeliver on his promises up to September 2009. Those achievements<br>\nwill depend on political will, over which nobody has control save<br>\nfor the President himself.<\/p>\n<p>For the President to put his political will into effect, he<br>\nmay well need to resort to some policies that might not be<br>\npopular and which could cause him problems in the polls. At this<br>\npoint, we would do well to remember the old East Java saying jer<br>\nbasuki mawa bea, or sacrifice is a prerequisite for prosperity.<br>\nTherefore, to the extent that his policies are justifiable, the<br>\nPresident should be able to rely on the public's understanding<br>\nand support.<\/p>\n<p>The writer is a senior partner with the law firm of Soebagjo,<br>\nJatim and Djarot in Jakarta.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/political-will-for-law-reform-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}