{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1201527,
        "msgid": "now-or-never-for-mass-transit-system-1447893297",
        "date": "1995-01-14 00:00:00",
        "title": "Now or never for mass transit system",
        "author": null,
        "source": "",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Now or never for mass transit system By Rita A. Widiadana and Johannes Simbolon JAKARTA (JP): Transportation experts say the time for the Jakarta municipal administration to develop a mass rapid transit system is now, before its construction becomes much more costly. Falatehan M. Siregar Ph. D., a transportation and urban planning graduate of the University of Wisconsin in the United States, and Dr. Bambang S.",
        "content": "<p>Now or never for mass transit system<\/p>\n<p>By Rita A. Widiadana and Johannes Simbolon<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): Transportation experts say the time for the<br>\nJakarta municipal administration to develop a mass rapid transit<br>\nsystem is now, before its construction becomes much more costly.<\/p>\n<p>Falatehan M. Siregar Ph. D., a transportation and urban<br>\nplanning graduate of the University of Wisconsin in the United<br>\nStates, and Dr. Bambang S. Pujiyanto, a transportation<br>\nengineering graduate of Nihon University of Tokyo, concur that<br>\nthe nation's capital badly needs a mode of transportation which<br>\ncan carry people in great numbers in order to cope with the<br>\ncity's expected rapid development over the next 30 years.<\/p>\n<p>\"We must have that kind of transportation, if not now,<br>\nsometime in the future. However, any delay means more money to be<br>\nincurred for its construction,\" Bambang said.<\/p>\n<p>Scenarios<\/p>\n<p>The government announced some time ago that it would build<br>\nsome mode of mass transportation in Jakarta. However, so far the<br>\ngovernment has been unable to decide on the specific time when<br>\nthe construction will start, and is still busy studying the<br>\nvarious scenarios proposed by potential investors.<\/p>\n<p>Neither of the transportation experts could predict when the<br>\ngovernment will give the go-ahead to the construction of a mass<br>\nrapid transit system.<\/p>\n<p>\"Nevertheless, that fact that the public is talking about the<br>\nissue so intensively at present, as compared to five years back,<br>\nwhen only a few people commented on it, may give us some hint<br>\nthat the construction will probably start soon,\" Siregar<br>\npredicted.<\/p>\n<p>Bambang and Siregar were of the opinion that from the<br>\nenvironmental point of view the subway mode would be more<br>\nsuitable and beneficial to Jakarta than any above ground mode.<br>\nThe environmental benefits include the fact that a subway creates<br>\nno eyesore and no sound pollution because it is underground.<br>\nThis, they say, outweighs the considerable construction costs<br>\ninvolved in developing a subway.<\/p>\n<p>\"The consideration of environmental benefits is in fashion now<br>\nin Japan. For example, some people are even suggesting<br>\neliminating the existing above ground mass rapid transportation<br>\nsystems and other infrastructure, and replacing them with<br>\nunderground systems. That means they will spend money twice. We<br>\nhope not to do the same thing in Jakarta,\" Bambang said.<\/p>\n<p>Why a subway ?<\/p>\n<p>Siregar explained there are several alternative modes of<br>\ntransportation for a mass rapid transit system. Among these are<br>\nheavy mass rapid transit systems, such as the subway, and light<br>\nrapid transit systems, such as the elevated train network.<\/p>\n<p>The urban area defined as Greater Jakarta is spreading to<br>\nencompass an ever larger expanse of suburbs, Siregar said. The<br>\nexisting transportation system, which employs big buses,<br>\nminibuses, taxis and ojek motorcycle cabs cannot accommodate<br>\nresidents living in the border areas. Moreover, poor management,<br>\nlack of good service, security and punctuality have discouraged<br>\npeople, mostly from the middle and upper segment of society, from<br>\nutilizing public transportation.<\/p>\n<p>Instead, they use privately owned cars to reach their working<br>\nplaces. As a result, the number of automobiles in Jakarta rose<br>\nsharply from approximately 8.3 million in l989 to 10.5 million in<br>\nl994 (or an annual growth of 15 percent), compared to the<br>\nadditions to the city's streets, which expand only 4 percent<br>\nannually.<\/p>\n<p>Public transportation vehicles account for only 2.7 percent of<br>\nthe total number of automobiles in Jakarta. Data show that the<br>\ncity currently has only 9,000 buses of all sizes, 18,000 taxis,<br>\nand 6,000 mini vans, which transport at least 4.5 million<br>\ncommuters, or 57 percent of the total populace, daily.<\/p>\n<p>In anticipation of continued rapid growth of the population, a<br>\nmass rap[id transit system is a must, Siregar said.<\/p>\n<p>He suggested that Jakarta operate a heavy mass rapid transit<br>\nsystem rather than a light one, like elevated electric trains.<\/p>\n<p>He explained that nowhere in the world are elevated electric<br>\ntrains able to transport millions of passengers within a limited<br>\ntime. Moreover, the construction of additional railway tracks in<br>\nthe city's center would present a complicated problem.<\/p>\n<p>Cost<\/p>\n<p>Bambang commented that theoretically the construction of a<br>\nsubway is very expensive. \"But, we should not only think about<br>\nthe construction cost. This system has long-term direct and<br>\nindirect advantages.<\/p>\n<p>\"We should not hesitate to adopt any hi-tech system already<br>\nused in foreign countries although it will be more expensive,\"<br>\nBambang said.<\/p>\n<p>In term of technology, he acknowledged that Indonesians are<br>\nnot yet capable of constructing such a sophisticated form of<br>\ntransportation system.<\/p>\n<p>Siregar made his case for subways by setting out the costs and<br>\nbenefits of the system in the form of data from foreign cities,<br>\nincluding Singapore, Calcutta, Seoul, Sao Paulo, and San<br>\nFrancisco.<\/p>\n<p>In Singapore, the construction of a subway cost around<br>\nUS$112.28 million a mile in l987. In l984, Sao Paulo in Brazil<br>\nconstructed a subway at $154.83 million a mile (or US$356.77<br>\nmillion in capital cost in constant l987 dollars). Los Angeles is<br>\npresently expanded its subway at a cost of $284 million a mile.<\/p>\n<p>\"The value of a subway project depends on the area of each<br>\ncity. The more difficult it is, the more expensive the project<br>\nwill be,\" Bambang said.<\/p>\n<p>As for Jakarta, he said he could not yet estimate the cost<br>\nbecause the existing proposals have yet to be approved.<\/p>\n<p>He confirmed that the construction of a subway would take<br>\nyears to complete.<\/p>\n<p>For example, the construction of a subway from Blok M to Kota<br>\n-- one of the most likely routes -- has been estimated to take<br>\nfive years because the project would include the construction of<br>\ninfrastructure, such as underground stations and other<br>\nfacilities.<\/p>\n<p>\"A subway is also an integrated project that involves various<br>\nagencies, so that any decision must be discussed at length and<br>\ncompromises reached first,\" he added.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/now-or-never-for-mass-transit-system-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}