{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1029772,
        "msgid": "new-approach-urged-on-east-timor-1447893297",
        "date": "1996-11-19 00:00:00",
        "title": "New approach urged on East Timor",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "New approach urged on East Timor East Timor Bishop Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo made headlines last week after a German magazine published his interview which allegedly putting Indonesia in a bad light. Sociologist Sardjono Jatiman looks at the issue from a wider context. Question: Bishop Belo's alleged critical remarks in Der Spiegel magazine have caused an uproar, your comments? Answer: I think it's normal.",
        "content": "<p>New approach urged on East Timor<\/p>\n<p>East Timor Bishop Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo made headlines<br>\nlast week after a German magazine published his interview which<br>\nallegedly putting Indonesia in a bad light. Sociologist Sardjono<br>\nJatiman looks at the issue from a wider context.<\/p>\n<p>Question: Bishop Belo's alleged critical remarks in Der<br>\nSpiegel magazine have caused an uproar, your comments?<\/p>\n<p>Answer: I think it's normal. When unpleasant things about your<br>\ncountry is exposed in another country, you will react that way.<br>\nIt does not only happen to Indonesians. People from other<br>\ncountries will also react in the same way under equal<br>\ncircumstances. If they do not, something must be wrong.<\/p>\n<p>The problem is, the issue itself is not clear yet. I myself<br>\nhave not yet read the article, nor most of those which condemned<br>\nthe bishop, I suppose. That's why, regardless of whether the<br>\nremarks are true or not, I am afraid the angry response is<br>\ninfluenced more by relentless media exposure than by the remarks<br>\nthemselves.<\/p>\n<p>Such a reaction manifested itself on previous issues such as<br>\nthat concerning (Supreme Court justice) Adi Andojo, the Situbondo<br>\nincident (mass riot), the assassination of a journalist in<br>\nYogyakarta, the death of a criminal suspect in a police precinct,<br>\netc. You name it. So, what I see here is that there is an<br>\nawareness among our citizens that something is not right and<br>\ntherefore something has to be done about it.<\/p>\n<p>Q: There is now a tendency for people to be easily incited, be<br>\nswift in judging others and they tend to do it in unison. What do<br>\nyou think about that?<\/p>\n<p>A: When there is public uproar, what we have to do is find the<br>\nexplanation based on each level of the community who react. For<br>\nexample, what is the reaction of the intellectuals, politicians,<br>\nwhat are the youth thinking, what about those of other groups in<br>\nsociety, etc.?<\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, here I cannot make such an explanation. We do<br>\nnot have the data. What I find is only news in the papers. Every<br>\nstatement I read or hear from printed or electronic media is<br>\nalways preceded by a sentence such as: \"We will see later ...\" or<br>\n\"If it is true...\".  There is no convincing statement.<\/p>\n<p>Q: There are those who say we are losing our debating culture.<br>\nIs it true?<\/p>\n<p>A: Did we ever have that culture? A feudalistic community<br>\nnever allows any difference in opinion. In the Javanese<br>\ncommunity, with its feudalistic structure, the young are always<br>\ntold to agree with their elders. There can be no difference in<br>\nopinion between a superior and a subordinate, or even between a<br>\nteacher and student, etc. Differences in opinion might occur only<br>\nin a more elite community. For example, when our founding fathers<br>\nwere debating the drafting of our constitutions.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Does this theory explain the tendency of people reacting<br>\nthe same way to a certain issue?<\/p>\n<p>A: We have what we call a silent mass. They do have their own<br>\nopinion, but they do not voice it. So, what seems to be the<br>\npublic's opinion at one time does not always reflect the reality.<br>\nIt is a common thing. Above all, we have these media, both<br>\nprinted and electronic, which often makes a person's opinion look<br>\nlike most people's.<\/p>\n<p>Q: Talking about difference of opinion, isn't it considered<br>\ncommon to have it in a country like Indonesia which claims to be<br>\na democracy?<\/p>\n<p>A: Yes, of course. Every democratic country should recognize<br>\ndifference of opinion. What makes it different is the way you<br>\nstate it. We have a certain norm to do it. Of course you may<br>\nargue with your parents, but you can state your argument in a<br>\npolite way, in a way that does not hurt them.<\/p>\n<p>I think, it is not the difference of opinion that matters, but<br>\nthe way we act to bridge the difference. Most people in Indonesia<br>\ndo not have the capability of dealing with such a difference. So,<br>\nthere is a tendency to consider differences as dislike. We also<br>\nfail to differentiate the person from what he says. In the<br>\ncontext of democracy, there is no need to have such a thing.<br>\nEvery person has his or her own opinion which we should<br>\nappreciate. Whether or not we agree with it is a different<br>\nmatter.<\/p>\n<p>Q: In Bishop Belo's case, what do you think we should do?<\/p>\n<p>A: Cool down. We have to be able to think about it with a cool<br>\nhead. Let's see the problem more clearly, for it is also possible<br>\nthat the people's reaction right now is an accumulation of<br>\nprevious events. So, do not look at it as an isolated problem.<\/p>\n<p>It's been a long time since East Timor was integrated into<br>\nIndonesia. Yet there are still problems to solve. Here we<br>\nprobably have to pay more attention to micro-problems as well.<br>\nAre we applying an appropriate approach in developing that<br>\nprovince? It is true there has been enormous physical development<br>\nthere, but it is not the most important aspect of development.<br>\nThere are also many important aspects beyond that, especially the<br>\ncultural one.<\/p>\n<p>I think it's about time for the government to handle problems<br>\nthat have caused cultural shocks. Not only in East Timor, but in<br>\nother provinces as well. Nipah or Kedungombo cases are some<br>\nexamples. So, every development has to be seen not only from an<br>\neconomical point of view but also from sociocultural ones. This<br>\nshould be designed right from the beginning by experienced<br>\nprofessionals, not amateurs.<\/p>\n<p>Q: What if the result of the review and the discussion on East<br>\nTimor is to give up the province?<\/p>\n<p>A: Oh... no, we have to start with a commitment that East<br>\nTimor is part of us, part of Indonesia. Do not ever consider it<br>\nanything else. We have to treat the development issue in the<br>\nprovince as our internal affair. Therefore, we will not let<br>\nanyone else or any other country interfere. (swa)<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Sardjono Jatiman is a senior lecturer in sociology at<br>\nUniversity of Indonesia.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/new-approach-urged-on-east-timor-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}