{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1589909,
        "msgid": "mkmk-says-report-concerning-adies-kadir-is-outside-its-jurisdiction-1772701921",
        "date": "2026-03-05 14:54:41",
        "title": "MKMK Says Report Concerning Adies Kadir Is Outside Its Jurisdiction",
        "author": "Ardito Ramadhan",
        "source": "KOMPAS",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Legal",
        "summary": "Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi (MKMK) says it has no jurisdiction to adjudicate reports alleging ethical violations by Constitutional Court Judge Adies Kadir, noting he has not yet been sworn in as a judge (or has completed his term) and thus falls outside Sapta Karsa Hutama oversight. The MKMK also found the reports to be based on supposition by the complainants and decided the three reports are not within its remit; the chair, I Dewa Palguna, stated it cannot examine or adjudicate the reports in question.",
        "content": "<p>JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - The Majelis Kehormatan Mahkamah Konstitusi\n(MKMK) said it is not competent to adjudicate reports concerning alleged\nethical violations by Constitutional Court Judge Adies Kadir. One\nconsideration is that the matter relates to Adies Kadir who has not yet\nbeen officially sworn in as a Constitutional Court Judge. \u201cSomeone who\nhas not yet held office as a Constitutional Court Judge, or after\ncompleting a term as a Constitutional Court Judge, is no longer subject\nto Sapta Karsa Hutama,\u201d said MKMK member Ridwan Mansyur in a session at\nthe Constitutional Court Building, Jakarta, on Thursday (5 March 2026).\nTherefore, if a person has not yet been sworn in as an MK judge or has\nfinished their term, they are no longer within MK\u2019s oversight. \u201cWhat is\nmeant by not bound here is that they are not within, or no longer\nwithin, the scope of monitoring or, more importantly, enforcement of the\nethics code and conduct by the Majelis Kehormatan as set out in Sapta\nKarsa Hutama,\u201d he added. In addition, MKMK\u2019s other considerations stated\nthat the contents of the reports are based on suspicion stemming from\nthe concerns of the complainants. Therefore, according to Ridwan, the\nalleged conduct by Adies that would violate ethics as described by the\ncomplainants cannot be measured against the ethics code and conduct of\nConstitutional Court Judges or Sapta Karsa Hutama. \u201cThus the Majelis\nKehormatan has no authority to examine and adjudicate the reports in\nquestion, whether for preventive purposes or for punitive action, or to\nuphold the ethics and conduct rules, because both preventive and\npunitive actions only take effect when someone has become a\nConstitutional Court Judge,\u201d he said. In the session held today, MKMK\nruled that the three reports were not within the MK\u2019s authority. \u201cThe\nMajelis Kehormatan is not competent to examine, adjudicate, and rule on\nthe reports in question,\u201d said MKMK Chair I Dewa Palguna, who presided\nover the session.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/mkmk-says-report-concerning-adies-kadir-is-outside-its-jurisdiction-1772701921",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}