{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1772910,
        "msgid": "mistaken-for-elephant-whale-identified-70-years-later-1780064951",
        "date": "2026-05-29 19:20:00",
        "title": "Mistaken for Elephant, Whale Identified 70 Years Later",
        "author": "",
        "source": "CNBC",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Anthropology",
        "summary": "Archaeologists in Alaska initially misidentified whale bones as mammoth remains, only discovering the error seven decades later. Radiocarbon dating revealed the bones are 2,000-3,000 years old, contradicting the earlier mammoth assumption, while isotope analysis pointed to a marine origin. The mystery of how whale remains ended up over 400km inland remains unresolved.",
        "content": "<p>Archaeologist Otto Geist discovered bones believed to be from a\nmammoth in 1951. However, the analysis was only proven wrong 70 years\nlater.<\/p>\n<p>Geist found them during an expedition in inland Alaska, a prehistoric\ngeographical region known as Beringia.<\/p>\n<p>Based on their appearance and location, Geist initially concluded the\nbones belonged to a woolly mammoth. This seemed plausible given the\ndiscovery site and spinal structure resembling elephant bones.<\/p>\n<p>The bones were later housed at the University of Alaska\u2019s Museum of\nthe North. It was only decades later, after the museum conducted\nradiocarbon dating, that the true identity was revealed.<\/p>\n<p>Analysis showed carbon isotopes in the bones dated back 2,000-3,000\nyears, meaning the animal lived more recently than mammoths, which went\nextinct 13,000 years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Further testing revealed higher levels of nitrogen-15 and carbon-13\nisotopes compared to grass-eating animals like woolly mammoths.<\/p>\n<p>While the findings do not rule out a land-based origin, the isotope\nlevels are typically found in marine animals.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is our first indication that the specimen originated from a\nmarine environment,\u201d said University of Alaska Fairbanks biogeochemist\nMathhews Wooler and his team, cited from Science Alert on Friday, 29 May\n2026.<\/p>\n<p>The most likely explanation is that the bones came from a whale.<\/p>\n<p>Researchers then extracted mitochondrial DNA for comparison with\nNorth Pacific right whale (Eubalaena japonica) and common minke whale\n(Balaenoptera acutorostrata) DNA.<\/p>\n<p>The team also uncovered another mystery: how whale remains over 1,000\nyears old ended up over 400km from the nearest coastline in inland\nAlaska.<\/p>\n<p>One possibility is that whales intruded inland via ancient bays and\nrivers, though this is unlikely given the species\u2019 size and the small\nwater bodies in the area.<\/p>\n<p>Another theory is that ancient humans transported the bones from the\ncoast. Researchers also acknowledged the possibility of scientific\nerror.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/mistaken-for-elephant-whale-identified-70-years-later-1780064951",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}