{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1736185,
        "msgid": "military-prosecutor-questions-senior-tni-defendant-in-andrie-yunus-case-did-he-not-stop-his-juniors-1778656136",
        "date": "2026-05-13 12:17:41",
        "title": "Military Prosecutor Questions Senior TNI Defendant in Andrie Yunus Case: Did He Not Stop His Juniors?",
        "author": "",
        "source": "DETIK",
        "tags": "",
        "topic": "Legal",
        "summary": "In a military court trial, senior TNI Captain Nandala Dwi Prasetyo admitted he failed to prevent three junior soldiers from throwing acid on KontraS activist Andrie Yunus, citing his own emotional reaction to Yunus's interruption of a TNI bill discussion. As the highest-ranking defendant, Nandala justified his inaction by expressing shared indignation and a desire to deter Yunus from similar actions, highlighting tensions between military personnel and civil society activists. The case underscores potential institutional sensitivities around legislative reforms and the accountability of military members for vigilante acts.",
        "content": "<p>One of the defendants in the acid-throwing case against KontraS\nactivist Andrie Yunus was questioned about his role as a senior TNI\nsoldier in preventing the actions of his three juniors towards Andrie.\nThe defendant claimed he did not prohibit the actions of his three\ncolleagues because he was also offended by Andrie\u2019s conduct after\ninterrupting a meeting discussing the TNI Bill.<\/p>\n<p>This was stated by defendant III, Captain Nandala Dwi Prasetyo,\nduring the continuation of the acid-throwing trial against Andrie Yunus,\nheld at the Jakarta Military Court on Wednesday (13\/5\/2026). Compared to\nthe other three defendants, Captain Nandala is the most senior TNI\nsoldier.<\/p>\n<p>The prosecutor initially asked Nandala about the plan to attack\nAndrie Yunus. During the trial, it was revealed that defendant I,\nSergeant Two Edi Sudarko, initially proposed beating Andrie Yunus.\nHowever, this proposal was rejected by defendant II, First Lieutenant\nBudhi Hariyanto Widhi, who suggested throwing caustic liquid on Andrie\ninstead.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDefendant III, in this case, is the eldest or holds the highest\nrank. Did he not feel that the planned action by Defendant I to beat or\nassault, and then Defendant II said not to beat but just pour, was that\naction appropriate for a TNI member?\u201d asked the prosecutor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes, it is not appropriate,\u201d replied Captain Nandala.<\/p>\n<p>The prosecutor then asked what response Captain Nandala, as a senior\nsoldier, gave to the proposals from his two juniors. The prosecutor\npressed Nandala on why he did not reprimand his juniors regarding the\nplan to harm Andrie Yunus.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDid Defendant III not prevent his juniors, saying \u2019don\u2019t, don\u2019t do\nthat, there are proper channels if you want to seek revenge against Mr\nAndrie Yunus, such as reporting or finding legal avenues against Andrie\nYunus, he should have stopped it. What next, Defendant III?\u201d asked the\nprosecutor.<\/p>\n<p>Nandala admitted he did not prohibit his juniors\u2019 plan. He claimed he\nwas also provoked emotionally after seeing a video of Andrie Yunus\ninterrupting the TNI Bill discussion session at the Fairmont Hotel.<\/p>\n<p>He added that the acid-throwing on Andrie Yunus was intended to give\na deterrent effect to the KontraS activist.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cAfter Defendant I showed the video, I felt annoyed, and at that time\nmy emotions peaked. After that, I joined in the corps spirit to carry it\nout together so that Andrie Yunus would learn his lesson,\u201d explained\nNandala.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHere, Defendant III mentions the purpose of making him learn his\nlesson. I assume this phrase \u2018learn his lesson\u2019 means the purpose of not\ndoing such things again. Is that correct?\u201d asked the prosecutor.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYes,\u201d replied Nandala.<\/p>\n<p>For information, the Andrie Yunus case began to be tried in military\ncourt on Wednesday (29\/4). In this case, there are four suspects who are\nTNI members.<\/p>\n<p>The military prosecutor has charged the four TNI soldiers with\nthrowing acid on Andrie Yunus. The military prosecutor said the\ndefendants carried out the action because they were annoyed with\nAndrie.<\/p>\n<p>The prosecutor stated that the defendants learned of Andrie on 16\nMarch 2025 when Andrie entered and interrupted a meeting discussing the\nrevision of the TNI Law held by the DPR at the Fairmont Hotel in South\nJakarta. The defendants viewed Andrie\u2019s actions as insulting the TNI\ninstitution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWith that incident, the defendants considered Mr Andrie Yunus to\nhave insulted the TNI institution, even trampling on the TNI\ninstitution,\u201d said the prosecutor when reading the indictment.<\/p>\n<p>The prosecutor charged the four soldiers with violating Article 469\nparagraph 1 subsidiary Article 468 paragraph 1 further subsidiary\nArticle 467 paragraph 1 in conjunction with paragraph 2 in conjunction\nwith Article 20 letter C of Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal\nCode.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/military-prosecutor-questions-senior-tni-defendant-in-andrie-yunus-case-did-he-not-stop-his-juniors-1778656136",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}