{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1220992,
        "msgid": "max-lane-responds-1447893297",
        "date": "2002-11-06 00:00:00",
        "title": "Max Lane responds",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Max Lane responds When I saw a letter by Geoffrey Gold, a well-known advisor to Australian business and mining interests, in The Jakarta Post on Nov. 5 responding to my articles on Australia-Indonesia relations, I was quite excited. However, I was disappointed that none of the issues being raised were discussed. Instead, there was a series of data, not always correct in detail but generally flattering, about my own political and human rights activities.",
        "content": "<p>Max Lane responds<\/p>\n<p>When I saw a letter by Geoffrey Gold, a well-known advisor to<br>\nAustralian business and mining interests, in The Jakarta Post on<br>\nNov. 5 responding to my articles on Australia-Indonesia<br>\nrelations, I was quite excited. However, I was disappointed that<br>\nnone of the issues being raised were discussed. Instead, there<br>\nwas a series of data, not always correct in detail but generally<br>\nflattering, about my own political and human rights activities.<br>\nGold certainly seems to pay a lot of attention to the activities<br>\nof dissidents and human rights activists, in both Indonesia and<br>\nAustralia. But then his firm is a consultant providing analysis<br>\nto business interests.<\/p>\n<p>Does he oppose the cancellation of Indonesia's foreign debt?<br>\nDoes he disagree that the West owes the exploited countries for<br>\ncenturies of exploitation? Does he support the fire sale of<br>\nIndonesian productive assets to foreign companies? Does he<br>\nsupport the IMF policies ending price subsidies on basic goods<br>\nfor the common people? Does he agree that Australia, in the IMF,<br>\nshould stop supporting the lowering of import tariffs and the<br>\nending of import regulations on rice and sugar, threatening<br>\nlivelihoods in these sectors? Does he join the Australian<br>\ngovernment in standing opposite almost all Indonesian human<br>\nrights groups which oppose the introduction of repressive<br>\nantiterror laws in Indonesia, mirroring the repressive laws in<br>\nAustralia used to justify armed ASIO raids on peoples' homes<br>\nwithout any public accountability?<\/p>\n<p>These are some of the real issues that relate to the<br>\nexploitative character of Australia's relations with Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>All Australian businesses that operated during the Soeharto-<br>\nGolkar dictatorship benefited from the absence of trade unions<br>\nand environmental laws. The real issue is to end the conditions<br>\nwhich operate against ordinary people: to build strong trade<br>\nunions, environmental laws and protective legislation.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesians will need the maximum unity in facing the<br>\npredatory West today just as they needed unity from \"Sabang to<br>\nMerauke\" to fight the predatory colonialism of the Dutch. The<br>\nstrongest form of unity will be that resulting from voluntary<br>\nagreement on both principle and form. Coercion and violence is<br>\nthe enemy of unity. This is the lesson of Aceh and Papua. Unity<br>\namong the 250 million people of the Indonesian archipelago,<br>\nincluding in Aceh and West Papua, will be best achieved by<br>\nrespecting everybody's rights to self-determination. Where does<br>\nGold stand?<\/p>\n<p>MAX LANE, Visiting Fellow, Centre for Asia Pacific, Social<br>\nTransformation, Studies (CAPSTRANS), University of Wollongong,<br>\nAustralia<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/max-lane-responds-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}