{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1328981,
        "msgid": "komnas-hams-accountability-1447893297",
        "date": "2003-06-20 00:00:00",
        "title": "Komnas HAM's accountability",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "Komnas HAM's accountability An intense row has recently developed between the Indonesia Military (TNI) and the Indonesian National Commission on Human Rights (Komnas HAM) over the latter's discovery of a mass grave in Aceh. To the TNI, the news, coupled with the latter's report about the presence of a military-backed militia in the province, came as a slap in the face because the TNI has been staging an \"all out\" operation to crush the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) rebel group.",
        "content": "<p>Komnas HAM's accountability<\/p>\n<p>An intense row has recently developed between the Indonesia<br>\nMilitary (TNI) and the Indonesian National Commission on Human<br>\nRights (Komnas HAM) over the latter's discovery of a mass grave<br>\nin Aceh. To the TNI, the news, coupled with the latter's report<br>\nabout the presence of a military-backed militia in the province,<br>\ncame as a slap in the face because the TNI has been staging an<br>\n\"all out\" operation to crush the Free Aceh Movement (GAM) rebel<br>\ngroup.<\/p>\n<p>What is saddening is that these two institutions were doing<br>\ntheir respective duties. The TNI feels it was cornered at a time<br>\nwhen it was seriously dealing with the threat to the nation's<br>\nintegrity, in which it would like to see all layers of society<br>\nlend support. On the other hand, based on its independent<br>\nprinciple, Komnas HAM's \"premature\" public disclosure of its<br>\ndiscovery of a mass grave and the presence of a military-backed<br>\nmilitia displeased the TNI.<\/p>\n<p>In my opinion there has been miscommunication concerning this<br>\nmatter in that the TNI expected Komnas HAM to first report its<br>\nfindings to the military before making a public statement,<br>\nwhereas Komnas HAM felt that it was not obliged to do so because<br>\nit is an independent institution. However, based on the<br>\ncarefulness and principle of responsibility, Komnas HAM should<br>\nhave refrained from revealing any preliminary findings to the<br>\npress, moreover to the foreign media.<\/p>\n<p>What is lacking here is a mechanism that regulates who reports<br>\nto whom, or the mechanism is already in place but has yet to be<br>\nimplemented. It means that if Komnas HAM says it is an<br>\nindependent institution, its accountability is to the House of<br>\nRepresentatives, since its membership was chosen by the House. So<br>\nit should first report to the House before reporting to others.<br>\nMost importantly, it should select which news can be released to<br>\nthe media, and consider how sensitive it is.<\/p>\n<p>Through this mechanism we would see the House summon and<br>\nprobably question the TNI if the evidence proves to be true, and<br>\nthrough this also we would see inter-institution relations run<br>\nsmoothly.<\/p>\n<p>M. RUSDI, Jakarta<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/komnas-hams-accountability-1447893297",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}