{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1269963,
        "msgid": "jp7todung-1447899208",
        "date": "2002-07-23 00:00:00",
        "title": "JP\/7\/TODUNG",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "JP\/7\/TODUNG Pat 2 of 2 Consolidation of Democracy: Challenges of Reform Todung Mulya Lubis Lawyer Jakarta A comprehensive constitution in Indonesia would prevent debates on whether the MPR stipulation implementing the Constitution is legally acceptable or not. A reading of the First, Second and Third Amendments of the 1945 Constitution does not yield the impression that we are in the process of drafting a comprehensive constitution along a clear democratic paradigm.",
        "content": "<p>JP\/7\/TODUNG<\/p>\n<p>Pat 2 of 2<\/p>\n<p>Consolidation of Democracy: Challenges of Reform<\/p>\n<p>Todung Mulya Lubis<br>\nLawyer <br>\nJakarta<\/p>\n<p>A comprehensive constitution in Indonesia would prevent <br>\ndebates on whether the MPR stipulation implementing the <br>\nConstitution is legally acceptable or not.<\/p>\n<p>A reading of the First, Second and Third Amendments of the <br>\n1945 Constitution does not yield the impression that we are in <br>\nthe process of drafting a comprehensive constitution along a <br>\nclear democratic paradigm.<\/p>\n<p>Even though the MPR decrees that the president and the vice <br>\npresident will have to go through direct voting by eligible <br>\nvoters, it is not clear what will happen if there is no candidate <br>\nwinning 50 percent or more of the votes. This means that it is <br>\nvery likely that a second round of elections will be held at the <br>\nMPR by MPR members enjoying the biggest number of votes.<\/p>\n<p>Should this happen, the democracy we all wish for will again <br>\nbe discarded by an undemocratic power system.<\/p>\n<p>Another thing that may be interpreted as undemocratic is the <br>\nconfinement of presidential and vice presidential candidates to <br>\nmembers of political parties and\/or a merger of political <br>\nparties.<\/p>\n<p>Article 6a (2) of the Third Amendment stipulates: \"The pair of <br>\npresidential and vice presidential candidates shall be proposed <br>\nby a political party or a merger of political parties taking part <br>\nin the general election prior to the implementation of the <br>\ngeneral election.\"<\/p>\n<p>This article closes the door to independent candidates who do <br>\nnot belong to any political party, while a citizen is entitled to <br>\nnominate themselves or be nominated for public office if this <br>\nperson is capable, according to the law.<\/p>\n<p>It, therefore, takes away political rights from those outside <br>\npolitical parties, even though political rights are human rights <br>\nguaranteed by the Constitution. This article also does not allow <br>\nfor better and more qualified presidential and vice presidential <br>\nnominees than those coming from political parties.<\/p>\n<p>If the drafter of the amendment could understand that the wind <br>\nof democratization is blowing throughout the planet, he would <br>\nrealize that practicing democracy is not the monopoly of a <br>\npolitical party. People who opt not to join any political party <br>\nwould have a legitimate and constitutional right to join <br>\npolitical activities and receive other constitutional guarantees.<\/p>\n<p>Another thing also ignored by the drafters of the amendment is <br>\nthe likelihood of establishing a local party. This party would <br>\nhave its activities in one or two regions only because they just <br>\nwant to concentrate on the regions, or because they do not think <br>\nthey are ready for the national political arena.<\/p>\n<p>In Germany, the Green Party began as a local party before <br>\nfinally taking part in national politics as a national political <br>\nparty. So, if in West Sumatra, for example, there is a Ninik <br>\nMamak Party (party of elders) only concerned with the development <br>\nof West Sumatra, this should be considered legitimate.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps, in the spirit of regional autonomy, this party might <br>\nlike to hold the position of governor or regent and influence the <br>\nregion's administrative system?<\/p>\n<p>In terms of substance, we can raise questions about many <br>\nthings in all these ratified amendments, for example, the <br>\nConstitutional Court, the process of impeachment, human rights, <br>\nand so forth. Unfortunately, the grammar of a number of articles <br>\nin the amendment are puzzling and confusing. For example, Article <br>\n22e (3) and (4), which read:<\/p>\n<p>\"Voters in the general election to elect members of the House <br>\nof Representatives and members of the regional legislative <br>\nassembly shall be political parties.\"<\/p>\n<p>\"Voters in the general election to elect members of the <br>\nregional representative assembly shall be individuals.\"<\/p>\n<p>If Article 22e (3) is carefully read, one may get the <br>\nimpression that it is the political party that elects members of <br>\nthe House of Representatives and the regional legislative <br>\nassembly.<\/p>\n<p>Who has the right to elect, a political party or a citizen as <br>\nan individual? Strangely, members of a regional representative <br>\nassembly will be elected by individuals.<\/p>\n<p>Why are those electing members of the House and the regional <br>\nlegislative assembly different from those electing members of the <br>\nregional representative assembly?<\/p>\n<p>Are those drafting the Amendment talking about the origin and <br>\nqualification of members of the House, the regional legislative <br>\nassembly and the regional representative assembly? If so, why is <br>\nthe word \"elect\" used in Article 22?<\/p>\n<p>The inconsistency of articles, clumsy grammar and a non-<br>\nparticipatory process are all factors supporting the demand that <br>\na Constitutional Commission be re-established.<\/p>\n<p>The excuse that such a commission is too late is unacceptable <br>\nbecause if our political elite are really sincere and willing, a <br>\nConstitutional Commission could work 240 days a year like in <br>\nThailand.<\/p>\n<p>There should be no fear that the amendment has \"gone too far\" <br>\nor that the unitary state of the republic will disappear.<\/p>\n<p>Popular sovereignty is popular sovereignty. With or without <br>\nchanges to the Constitution, it would be beyond the power of any <br>\ngovernment from stopping people exercising this right. So, stop <br>\nscaring people away and let's start to assume an honest attitude <br>\ntowards ourselves: Are we to build popular sovereignty, <br>\ndemocracy, the supremacy of the law and human rights? Or, should <br>\nwe return to the authoritarian past where law and truth depended <br>\nupon the generosity of the ruler?<\/p>\n<p>The new Constitution will not be a very effective panacea but <br>\nif drafted comprehensively through a participatory process, it <br>\nwill be able to serve as a new social contract that brings with <br>\nit new hope for our future, the future of our children and that <br>\nof our grandchildren.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/jp7todung-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}