{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1016804,
        "msgid": "jp3pam-1447899208",
        "date": "1994-05-23 00:00:00",
        "title": "JP\/3\/Pam",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "JP\/3\/Pam PAM Jaya told to resume construction of water main JAKARTA (JP): City councilors are urging the City Water Company, PAM Jaya, to resume construction work of a 17-kilometer water main, stretching from Pos Pengumben to a point near the Orchid Hotel in West Jakarta.",
        "content": "<p>JP\/3\/Pam<\/p>\n<p>PAM Jaya told to resume construction of water main<\/p>\n<p>JAKARTA (JP): City councilors are urging the City Water <br>\nCompany, PAM Jaya, to resume construction work of a 17-kilometer <br>\nwater main, stretching from Pos Pengumben to a point near the <br>\nOrchid Hotel in West Jakarta.<\/p>\n<p>\"While the dispute between PAM Jaya and PT Grade Utama (the <br>\ncontractor) has yet to be settled, the construction of the water <br>\nmain should not be deferred, because it is for the interest of <br>\nthe public,\" Arie Putra Bintana, the secretary of the City <br>\nCouncil's Commission D on public works, told The Jakarta Post.<\/p>\n<p>Arie made the statement late last week after attending a <br>\nhearing between his commission with PT Grade Utama and its lawyer <br>\nfrom Hotma Sitompoel and Associates.<\/p>\n<p>PAM Jaya has unilaterally annulled its contract with the <br>\ncontractor. It accuses PT Grade Utama of subcontracting the water <br>\nmain project without its approval. PAM has also charged that the <br>\nprivate company bribed its officials during the tender period.<\/p>\n<p>Arie's stance was supported by Sumekar, another member of <br>\nCommission D, who said the dispute should not in anyway be used <br>\nby either party as an excuse to delay the completion of the <br>\nproject.<\/p>\n<p>\"Both PAM Jaya and PT Grade Utama should place the interests <br>\nof the public above theirs, and resume the construction of the <br>\nproject,\" Sumekar said.<\/p>\n<p>Arie added that if PT Grade Utama should be proven to be in <br>\nthe wrong, the work should be transferred to and continued by the <br>\nnext lowest bidder.<\/p>\n<p>Arie emphasized the importance of the continuation of the work <br>\nbecause the World Bank loaned the government money to finance the <br>\nproject.<\/p>\n<p>\"In the near future we will meet with the municipal <br>\nadministration officials who are handling this case,\" Arie told <br>\nthe Post. The councilors have met with PAM Jaya to discuss the <br>\nproblem.<\/p>\n<p>Martin Peter Yan Malingkas, the president of PT Grade Utama, <br>\nsaid his company had completed 549 meters of the 17-kilometer-<br>\nlong, 55.85-thick pipe when PAM Jaya ordered the firm to stop the <br>\nconstruction on March 3, 1994.<\/p>\n<p>PAM Jaya said it annulled its contract with PT Grade Utama on <br>\nMarch 3 because it found out that the company had subcontracted <br>\nthe entire construction project to Suhardi of PT Kokoh Semesta. <br>\nThis move was reportedly documented in a May 19, 1993, agreement <br>\nbetween PT Grade Utama and Suhardi and Indrawan Djaja of PT Kokoh <br>\nSemesta.<\/p>\n<p>According to PAM Jaya, this arrangement runs counter to the <br>\nstatement made by PT Grade Utama one day before the firm was <br>\ndeclared to have won the contract on Jan. 6, 1994.<\/p>\n<p>In the statement, PT Grade Utama committed itself to doing all <br>\nthe work by itself and to assuming all responsibility if proven <br>\nto have subcontracted the entire project to a third party.<\/p>\n<p>On March 11, 1994, PT Grade Utama asked PAM Jaya to review the <br>\ncancellation on the ground that it had terminated its contract <br>\nwith PT Kokoh Semesta on March 8, 1993. This was reportedly <br>\nconfirmed with a document verified by a notary.<\/p>\n<p>PT Grade Utama also asked Governor Surjadi Soedirdja to review <br>\nthe cancellation.<\/p>\n<p>Feeling that both PAM Jaya and the governor ignored its plea, <br>\nPT Grade Utama then took the problem to the Jakarta <br>\nAdministrative Court, which on March 25, 1994, ordered PAM Jaya <br>\nto delay the enforcement of the annulment. (arf)<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/jp3pam-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}