{
    "success": true,
    "data": {
        "id": 1360078,
        "msgid": "jp3-insight-1447899208",
        "date": "2003-08-16 00:00:00",
        "title": "JP\/3 \/INSIGHT",
        "author": null,
        "source": "JP",
        "tags": null,
        "topic": null,
        "summary": "JP\/3 \/INSIGHT Our independence: In the shadows of violence and seduction B. Herry-Priyono Lecturer Driyarkara School of Philosophy Jakarta The river of time has brought us again to the eve of Indonesia's 58th anniversary. It may be time to prepare a celebration. A celebration could be a moment of hurrah; it could be a moment for soul searching as well. Either way, it is a virtuous moment to briefly escape from the torments of living in our present predicament.",
        "content": "<p>JP\/3 \/INSIGHT<\/p>\n<p>Our independence: In the shadows of violence and seduction<\/p>\n<p>B. Herry-Priyono<br>\nLecturer<br>\nDriyarkara School <br>\nof Philosophy<br>\nJakarta<\/p>\n<p>The river of time has brought us again to the eve of <br>\nIndonesia&apos;s 58th anniversary. It may be time to prepare a <br>\ncelebration. A celebration could be a moment of hurrah; it could <br>\nbe a moment for soul searching as well. Either way, it is a <br>\nvirtuous moment to briefly escape from the torments of living in <br>\nour present predicament.<\/p>\n<p>Indonesia is a dream, not a reality. This may simply say <br>\nsomething so familiar and worn that it has become the cliche of <br>\nall cliches: It is an aspiration to a political community in the <br>\nform of a nation.<\/p>\n<p>A community is a group of people who share bonds of affection <br>\nand a moral culture in the broadest sense, and it is distinct <br>\nfrom an interest group. People that band together to gain <br>\nprivileged treatment make an interest group; those who share a <br>\ncertain level of geopolitical history make a community. An <br>\nexalted definition indeed.<\/p>\n<p>The fact that it is so lofty and because of this, too remote, <br>\ncould be gleaned from how the concept of &quot;sharing&quot; is too tall an <br>\norder. Again, we are forced to leave the utopia of normative <br>\ndefinition and return to the torments of our present condition. <br>\nAfter the political vices and virtues of the founders of this <br>\nrepublic in creating a nascent Indonesia, one of the torments we <br>\nface today is how to transform Indonesia as a mere crowd of <br>\npeople into Indonesia as a community.<\/p>\n<p>Here, what we find is not the process from crowd to community, <br>\nbut a quick deterioration from crowd to mob. Nowhere has this <br>\nshift been more pronounced than in the escalating orgy of <br>\nviolence in the form of acts of terror, bombings and communal <br>\nviolence. What has all this to do with our sense of community? It <br>\nis simple proven logic that violence shatters the sense of trust <br>\nand togetherness.<\/p>\n<p>Surely, unearthing the roots of this orgy of violence requires <br>\na thorough investigation. And, as in many other areas of public <br>\nlife, assigning such a difficult task to government is like going <br>\nout to hunt with a pack of toothless dogs.<\/p>\n<p>In truth, the orgy of violence is also much greater in scope <br>\nthan acts of terror, bombings and communal violence. It is <br>\nembedded in the way our media, especially television, run their <br>\nentertainment programs. Every time they visit Indonesia, my <br>\nEuropean friends are disgusted by Indonesian television, which <br>\nare cannibalized, if not by brainless gossip programs, then by <br>\nthoughtless violent films.<\/p>\n<p>They are not mistaken. As always, the apologists of such <br>\nprograms would argue that there is no connection between the <br>\n&quot;bang-bang&quot; programs and the actual, increasingly rampant <br>\nviolence in our society. For sure, such apologists would advance <br>\ntheir point with the support of vacuous statistics.<\/p>\n<p>What a pseudo-scientific attempt! They hardly look into the <br>\nproblem that the issue is not statistical, but psychological, in <br>\nhow the barraging images of violence penetrate deep into our <br>\npsyche and become a real force in forming the foundation of our <br>\nbasic instinct.<\/p>\n<p>Surely this is not the same as saying that the cannibalization <br>\nof our media by violence has a causal link to, for example, the <br>\nBali or JW Marriott bombings. What it says is that the orgy of <br>\nviolence in our society is more commonplace than these tragedies, <br>\nand ours has increasingly become a society that is ambivalent <br>\ntoward violence: It is loathed and simultaneously liked, and it <br>\nis despised and simultaneously celebrated.<\/p>\n<p>It is through the orgy of violence that our sense of community <br>\nis banalized and shattered. It is wise, however, to pose the <br>\nfollowing devil&apos;s advocate question: Should the orgy of violence <br>\ncease, will the banalization of our society also stop?<\/p>\n<p>Most likely not.<\/p>\n<p>The above question may sound strange and, because of it, is <br>\nhardly raised. To raise this question is by no means to underrate <br>\nthe urgency for solutions to the orgy of violence. What it says <br>\nis that the corrosion of our society comes not only from the orgy <br>\nof violence, but also from the orgy of seduction.<\/p>\n<p>Again, what we have in our media, television and mushrooming <br>\nvoyeuristic print-media in particular, could be taken as an <br>\nexample. Turn on any television channel, and in a matter of a few <br>\nseconds we will find ourselves stupefied by mindless programs, <br>\nmostly presenting gossip, celebrity chat shows and other <br>\nvoyeuristic programs. This is an economy founded upon the <br>\ncommercial preying of voyeurism.<\/p>\n<p>Or, going to most newsstands on any city boulevard, we would <br>\nfind more and more gossip, life-style and celebrities magazines, <br>\nad infinitum, all valorizing brainless consumerist cults. All are <br>\ntargeted at the consumption of the mindless cupidity of youth, <br>\ndazed by the ecstasy of voyeurism. As expected, the apologists <br>\nwould argue that such is the demand of most people, ergo they <br>\nprovide the supply. Ooh, come on, don&apos;t we remember Say&apos;s law <br>\nthat &quot;supply creates demand&quot;?<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, in this process of banalization, depth is by <br>\ndefinition lack of accessibility. It takes only a short step for <br>\nthis cultural banality to become interchangeable with vacuity. <br>\nThe credo of this cultural banality or vacuity is proudly <br>\nadvertised, for example, by A Mild cigarette: Gue berpikir, <br>\nkarena itu gue tambah bingung (I think, therefore I become more <br>\nconfused).<\/p>\n<p>What has all this to do with the problem besieging Indonesia? <br>\nIf the orgy of violence shatters the potential fabric of a <br>\ncommunity, the orgy of seduction banalizes the potential <br>\nintellectual depth by which a political community called <br>\nIndonesia is made possible.<\/p>\n<p>In the midst of such orgies of seduction, we should not be <br>\nsurprised then if people would vote for murderers, thugs or <br>\ncorruptors as leaders of Indonesia.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, as the late Antonio Gramsci, a renowned Italian <br>\nthinker, warned us a long time ago, monstrous power operates <br>\nthrough dual faces: Coercion, and what appears as consent.<\/p>",
        "url": "https:\/\/jawawa.id\/newsitem\/jp3-insight-1447899208",
        "image": ""
    },
    "sponsor": "Okusi Associates",
    "sponsor_url": "https:\/\/okusiassociates.com"
}